https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949
--- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov ---
No, just 0.1.git1e9ef80
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197947
--- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel ---
(In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #7)
> If you package the latest commit (8a206ce3ad129d1588f8f57bd65d860369e92036),
> you don't need to patch the sources.
Eh, a patch is easier to manage t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
Spec URL:
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/f23-kde-theme/f23-kde-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/f23-kde-theme/f23-kde-theme-23.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
%changelog
* Thu Aug 06 2015 R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
Those dirs should probably be owned by kde-filesystem/kf5-filesytem, but I'll
add them here until properly fixed elsehwere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
--- Comment #17 from nobra...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue.spec
SRPM URL: https://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/hyperrogue-6.6-1.fc22.src.rpm
I've updated my spec to fix some typo, and force the use of the -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler ---
Until that happens, I think we should treat the V8 portability issue as a
non-blocker. Especially, because technically, one could get around the SSE2
issue by excluding i686 entirely, but it is of course b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251278
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1243533
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251278
Bug ID: 1251278
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Gettext -
Angular-gettext (XStatic packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
--- Comment #4 from Adam Miller ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
--- Comment #3 from Seth Jennings ---
Adam, thanks for the review! New spec and SRPM using the __python2 macro.
Spec URL: https://www.variantweb.net/pub/fedora/specs/yubioath-desktop.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.variantweb.net/pub/fedora/22/sou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Adam Mille
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1251241
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949
--- Comment #15 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Thanks, I tried to learn more about the naming guidelines at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
Should I also include the date? Like 0.1.20150726git1e9ef80
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
Fedora Blocker Bugs Application changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews),
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251247
Bug ID: 1251247
Summary: Review Request: f23-kde-theme - Fedora Twenty Three
KDE Theme
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1170817 |
|(AlphaBlocker,F23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1251242
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
Seth Jennings changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
--- Comment #1 from Seth Jennings ---
Created attachment 1060060
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1060060&action=edit
self-reporting fedora-review
This is my first package submission so, afaict, I need a sponsor.
Koji scra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
Bug ID: 1251238
Summary: Review Request: yubioath-desktop - Yubikey tool for
generating OATH tokens
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246720
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250344
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Haïke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250344
--- Comment #6 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Thanks, I'll apply the requested before first build!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250344
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249271
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249146
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249272
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250257
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150445
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244517
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246974
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> (In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #2)
> > In section %check no tests, see here - [1]. ( in this case will - add
> > "BuildRequires: rubygem(rspec)" and in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197947
--- Comment #7 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Hi Ben!
If you package the latest commit (8a206ce3ad129d1588f8f57bd65d860369e92036),
you don't need to patch the sources.
And I still like the use of git tags instead of guessing what kind of s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242723
--- Comment #3 from Tim Orling ---
Spec URL:
https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-Packages/perl-Alien-Packages.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ttorling.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-Packages/perl-Alien-Packages-0.003-2.fc23.src.rpm
Git URL:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246974
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246974
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Gradina ---
In section %check no tests, see here - [1]. ( in this case will - add
"BuildRequires: rubygem(rspec)" and in %check add "rspec -Ilib spec" ).
Also see output rpmlint:
1) summary-too-long
2) in URL: beter u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230227
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033798
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Jan, Fridolin, any idea if this package or one of its possible forks exist in
fedora? Or else, we'll need to review, approve and close this :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fpoko...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245958
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245967
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246033
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246740
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246205
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246766
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245618
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248103
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251136
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1251146
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1251146
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251134
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1251146
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230227
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1221832
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
--- Comment #4 from Irina Boverman ---
Attached revised spec file and source RPM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
--- Comment #3 from Irina Boverman ---
Created attachment 1059992
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1059992&action=edit
source rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment||review?
#1059990 Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243507
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-LUHN-1.01-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Algorithm-LUHN-1.01-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ---
Wow, another miracle, this time going on at Chromium upstream:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/master/src/interpreter
(started 2 weeks ago, probably not usable yet). When done, and when it rea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251134
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251136
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251136
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251134
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment||review?
#1059973 Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251136
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment||review?
#1059976 Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251136
--- Comment #2 from Irina Boverman ---
Created attachment 1059977
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1059977&action=edit
source rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251136
Bug ID: 1251136
Summary: Review Request: qpid-tests - Conformance tests for
Apache Qpid
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: mediu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251134
Irina Boverman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251134
--- Comment #2 from Irina Boverman ---
Created attachment 1059975
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1059975&action=edit
source rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251134
Bug ID: 1251134
Summary: Review Request: qpid-tools - Management and diagostic
tools for Apache Qpid
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168432
--- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme ---
> The spec looks great but you must use the %%license macro in %%files:
Forgot to update that, sorry:
SPEC:
http://jenselme.perso.centrale-marseille.fr/visible/SPECS/python-PyMySQL.spec
SRPMS:
http://jen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #7)
> I have added link to pull request which adds license in files distribution.
Thx
> What is my next steps?
I'm still waiting for some informal reviews. So far, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||zendframework/zendpdf
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
Bug ID: 1251034
Summary: Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend
Framework ZendPdf component
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250833
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request:Helm - |Review Request: helm -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250833
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251016
Bug ID: 1251016
Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Releases-Latest - Find
latest release of all distributions on CPAN
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250833
--- Comment #2 from j...@therobinsonfamily.net ---
This is my first request and I need a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246763
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246762
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250929
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1243533
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949
--- Comment #14 from Alexander Kurtakov ---
Pre release Release tag should be 0.1.git%{short_sha}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250929
Bug ID: 1250929
Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Gettext -
Angular-Gettext (XStatic packaging standard)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246763
--- Comment #2 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
1, 2 and 3 fixed on:
https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/cutegram/cutegram-2.5.0-3.fc22.src.rpm
https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/cutegram/cutegram.spec
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246762
--- Comment #2 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Hi
1, 2 and 4 fixed in
https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/cutegram/telegramqml-0.8.0-5.fc22.src.rpm
https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/cutegram/telegramqml.spec
As group tag is optional,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246763
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich ---
1) Missing runtime dependencies - at least qt5-qtquickcontrols and
qt5-qtgraphicaleffects were required and not installed automatically
2) License should be marked with %license macro
3) Mixing tabs and spac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246762
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich ---
1) ldconfig should be called in %post and %postun
2) The spec file from the URL above is not the same as the one in SRPM
3) Group tag is optional and used only for compatibility with EPEL
4) You are mixing t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc23
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247747
Lukas Brabec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lbra...@redhat.com
--- Comment #14 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |noarch
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |noarch
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193990
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1250884
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1250887
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo