https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230445
Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233263
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205479
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986550
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162234
--- Comment #25 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
We have this process
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group to
get sponsored into the packager group. Can you either submit few more packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251416
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-into-stream-2.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251416
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251459
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-pem-1.7.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251459
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255537
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251489
Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249145
Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251416
Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251459
Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251416
Bug 1251416 depends on bug 1251489, which changed state.
Bug 1251489 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-from2 - Wrapper for ReadableStream,
with an API lifted from from and through2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251489
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi can you take for me one of these?
springframework-data-redis -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
apacheds-jdbm - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254820
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254820
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254820
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255537
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255537
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Created attachment 1065827
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1065827action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061
Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-318 for missing license file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254820
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255537
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 1065962
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1065962action=edit
ndn-cxx.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
First of all, there is incongruity between package name of the review title and
the name of your package (libndn-cxx VS ndn-cxx); i think, you should name this
package as libndn-cxx.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234468
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
envytools-0.0-0.3.git20150812.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247672
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fstrcmp-0.7.D001-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197947
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|khard-0.4.1-1.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244817
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-xvfbwrapper-0.2.4-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244817
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|0.2.4-2.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197947
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
khard-0.4.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234468
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247672
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|fstrcmp-0.7.D001-4.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-jdbm.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-jdbm-2.0.0-0.2.M3.fc22.src.rpm
- added extra comments about license
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242086
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
parcimonie.sh-0-0.4.20150804gitc009937.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251459
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251416
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131731
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|php-pimple-3.0.1-1.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131731
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-pimple-3.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
Bug ID: 1255973
Summary: Review Request: libndn-cxx - C++ library, implementing
Named Data Networking (NDN) primitives
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #1 from Susmit thinklinux@gmail.com ---
Sorry,
SRPM is here:
http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~susmit/ndn/ndn-cxx-0.3.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238301
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238301
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
qt5-qtcanvas3d-5.5.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238296
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
qt5-qt3d-5.5.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238299
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
qt5-qtenginio-5.5.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238296
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884
Susmit thinklinux@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #3 from Susmit thinklinux@gmail.com ---
Sorry Gil, I have already taken another up. I will commit another package soon,
may be we can swap that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Before using fedora-review must be removed:
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
Please, remove
cp %_builddir/%{name}-%{name}-%{version}/*.md %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/
cp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Susmit from comment #3)
Sorry Gil, I have already taken another up. I will commit another package
soon, may be we can swap that?
sure, then remove from this bug, my offer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|punto...@libero.it |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #7 from Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3)
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061
--- Comment #14 from Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de ---
Thank you for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #7)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3)
[!]: Package must own all directories that it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
strange ... i uploaded new spec file and src rpm some hour ago
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #7)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3)
[!]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #9 from bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com ---
We need to revert a change in stackforge/networking-bigswitch stable/kilo
branch. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215848/, Once that review gets merged,
we will push a proper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Created attachment 1065870
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1065870action=edit
files.dir
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #7)
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3)
[!]: Package must own all directories that it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #2 from Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #3 from Till Hofmann hofm...@kbsg.rwth-aachen.de ---
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-poms
/apacheds-jdbm, /usr/share/java/apacheds-jdbm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3)
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-poms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
mavibot - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243761
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246719
--- Comment #4 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
It looks like you have quite a few packages in need of review. :) If you have a
preference as to which one I review, please let me know. Otherwise I'll just
grab one.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3)
Please do not add the License file yourself.
this is the normal practice
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-jdbm.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251238
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yubioath-desktop-2.1.1-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
docker-compose-1.4.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245929
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
platform-1.0.10-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244522
Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
76 matches
Mail list logo
