https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #14 from xinwu xin...@bigswitch.com ---
Sure, will do :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128336
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|0.1.2-1.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128336
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libnsbmp-0.1.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-affinity-0.1.0-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129505
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|opensou...@till.name|
Adam Miller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243052
--- Comment #10 from Javier Peña jp...@redhat.com ---
I'm not sure why I didn't see Alan's comment regarding the new upstream
release. I have updated the spec to use the latest upstream release (0.4.0):
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
--- Comment #4 from Chandan Kumar chkumar...@gmail.com ---
Hello Social,
Thanks for submitting the package for review.
Below is my inline comments:
[1.] under %prep section, Remove bundled egg-info by adding
rm -rf %{pypi_name}.egg-info
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256387
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
--- Comment #18 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17)
(In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #16)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
(In reply to Dave Johansen from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251016
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254820
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-firephp-firephp-core-0.4.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
--- Comment #3 from Lukas Bezdicka lbezd...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Javier Peña from comment #2)
Would it be possible to add the README.md file to the python3 package? I
guess it should be there, too.
I'm still not sure I understand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244
--- Comment #5 from Nikola Forró nfo...@redhat.com ---
As far as I know, uClibc package in Fedora exists only to enable static linking
with busybox. Nothing else depends on it, and it's practical use is limited
because it only contains static
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
Javier Peña jp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jp...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256479
--- Comment #6 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jens Lody from comment #5)
Obviously BR needs to be fixed.
It is blocked by bug 1256475 (and yes, that one will be also resolvable only
sometime).
I s there no way to make it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353
--- Comment #5 from Chandan Kumar chkumar...@gmail.com ---
[1.] In the spec file, use
Source:
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/python-editor/python-editor-0.3.tar.gz
[2.] Since License file is missing in pypi tarball, please add the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
--- Comment #19 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ are compatible licenses; using GPLv3+ means to include the
GPLv2+ code too
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250526
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244977
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1235420
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180378
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254484
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #16 from bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com ---
Please use following links for review
Spec URL:
https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/24hmnr6ojdgwulgpqclcvlvp5qf8tdt3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834
--- Comment #7 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-rackspace-auth-openstack
Short Description: Rackspace authentication for openstack clients
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249145
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249145
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-is-plain-obj-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251489
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-from2-2.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251489
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7780
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14189
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256479
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725733
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Seem that similarly, nodejs-package went with closure-compiler executable ...
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/nodejs-closure-compiler.git/tree/
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14191
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14190
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7782
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14194
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7781
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725733
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/vondruch/public_git/rubygem-closure-compiler.git/tree/rubygem-closure-compiler.spec?id=db1e3875060985324ffc58e90fc4d1c82090f9cd
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7779
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14193
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14195
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
I think you can use the following python guidelines format in spec file which
should also run fine for epel7.
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/python-os-testr.spec
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
--- Comment #16 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
(In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #13)
[!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178106
Radek Novacek rnova...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #12 from bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com ---
Thanks a lot Ihar for the review. Your comments have been addressed. Instead of
having two separate packages, we create subpackages with one spec file.
Documentation is also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246846
Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|heg...@gmail.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246846
Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akurt...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255856
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254484
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-pluggy-0.3.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14210
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256479
--- Comment #5 from Jens Lody fed...@jenslody.de ---
When trying to run it in fedora-review for epel-7 I get the following error:
error: syntax error in expression
error: /home/jens/1256479-gedit-plugin-git/srpm/gedit-plugin-git.spec:1: bad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7784
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14206
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14207
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14205
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7783
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254484
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256479
--- Comment #4 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #3)
First findings:
%description
The gedit git plugin packages separately (because it requires
packages not available in the RHEL-7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255855
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #15 from bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com ---
Hi Haikel, I'm looking into these two right now: 1242886 1242896.
I'll update once I'm done with the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129505
--- Comment #7 from Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com ---
Either something is wrong with the encoding of the spec file, the web server is
messed up, or we found a bug in fedora-review (or maybe python!) :)
$ fedora-review -b 1129505 -m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505
--- Comment #2 from Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com ---
updated spec accordingly; see
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugin-system-upgrade/blob/master/dnf-plugin-system-upgrade.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
Irina Boverman ibove...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505
--- Comment #3 from Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com ---
Also note that version 0.3.0 *does* provide a /usr/bin/fedup
backward-compatibility wrapper, so the package now obsoletes fedup.
New packages are currently building in copr.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020435
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Created attachment 1066828
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1066828action=edit
licensecheck of uClibc-ng
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250526
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/java-mersenne-twister.spec
SRPM URL: https://jgu.fedorapeople.org/java-mersenne-twister-20-3.fc22.src.rpm
Thanks very much Jerry.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251016
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250447
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250526
Bug 1250526 depends on bug 1250447, which changed state.
Bug 1250447 Summary: Review Request: perl-Iterator-Simple - Simple iterator and
utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250447
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255815
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254778
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129505
--- Comment #10 from Jens Lody fed...@jenslody.de ---
Looks like we are bitten by this bug;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241655#c8
Should be fixed in update-testing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129505
--- Comment #11 from Jens Lody fed...@jenslody.de ---
Enabling epel-testing in mock config and recreating the mock-root makes
fedora-review workagain for epel7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256435
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
--- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Now SCM request present.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250526
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129505
--- Comment #9 from Jens Lody fed...@jenslody.de ---
Oh I just saw the bugs-title, so it seems to be related to the
mock-configuration.
I will test this review also.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884
Susmit thinklinux@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo