https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|tchollingswo...@gmail.com |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242011
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-UcsSdk-0.8.2.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #28)
some way to add a prefix.
Sorry suffix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #27)
Ah, I didn't know that. I can review it if you want. Sounds like a logical
exchange.
Okay if you have time that would be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for all your work on this.
I am not sure which binary package should really correctly own the datadir
but overall the package looks fine to me now.
The only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #27 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr ---
Ah, I didn't know that. I can review it if you want. Sounds like a logical
exchange.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Bug ID: 1257908
Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-GoFaster - Optimise
executable Perl ops
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
--- Comment #11 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
Any update on this review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
--- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
I wait on the review submitter to provide updated package with correct License
value.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #23 from Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com ---
I believe main python package should depend on python-neutron not
openstack-neutron-common. The latter should be the dependency for your agent.
Summary for -doc sub package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
--- Comment #38 from Yajo yajo@gmail.com ---
Updated to qutepart 2.2.2.
SPEC URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/yajo/enki/python-qutepart.git/plain/python-qutepart.spec?id=83ae63ca5a9eb6798440146092b4b28da5381619
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963
Pranav Kant pranav...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pranav...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251951
Chandan Kumar chku...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
java-mersenne-twister-20-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14488
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
java-mersenne-twister-20-4.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14491
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Devel-GoFaster-0.000-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14495
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Devel-GoFaster-0.000-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14496
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
java-mersenne-twister-20-4.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14490
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
--- Comment #39 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
It's worth a try to make the tests work with success, so we could ensure some
QA already in the build phase. Maybe take a look into my trojita.spec file [1]
as a template how X could
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Wow, that was unexpectedly fast. Thank you both.
(In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1)
FIX: Please remove a *.bs file
Done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
--- Comment #40 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213184
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Updated to version 4.5.3:
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cryptominisat4/cryptominisat4.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
can you take this for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(hobbes1069@gmail. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
can you take this for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230227
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
Any progress?
No. There have been developments in Fedora, mostly centered at redhat.cz, which
have caused me not to have continued my works on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173798
Bug 1173798 depends on bug 1173797, which changed state.
Bug 1173797 Summary: Review Request: python-wikitcms - Fedora QA wiki test
management Python library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173797
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173797
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256097
--- Comment #9 from Tonet Jallo tonet6...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: synapse
Short Description: Semantic launcher written in Vala
Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/synapse-project
Owners:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
winswitch-0.12.21-17.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
Suggestion:
cryptominisat4.src:87: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}*
cryptominisat4.src:88: E: hardcoded-library-path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
ISSUES:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: LGPL, GPL (v3 or later),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828
--- Comment #24 from bigswitch rhosp-bugs-inter...@bigswitch.com ---
Reviewer comments about service files have been addressed.
Please use following links for further review.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
list of packages which should be updated
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fasterxml-oss-parent
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/?q=jackson
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257619
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-julienschmidt-httprouter-1.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora
21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
java-mersenne-twister-20-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257619
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-julienschmidt-httprouter-1.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora
22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256344
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813564
Philip Prindeville phil...@redfish-solutions.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #6)
The only issue I see is that the latest version (2.6.1) is not packaged.
Can it be used, or is there a reason why 2.5.0 is necessary?
On a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
winswitch-0.12.21-17.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|0.12.21-17.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-affinity-0.1.0-5.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|0.1.0-5.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|0.12.21-17.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243530
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
winswitch-0.12.21-17.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-affinity-0.1.0-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091100
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|0.1.0-5.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
The license situation really is confusing. I'm going to write to upstream and
ask them to do something about that. Thank you for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078
--- Comment #13 from Carl George carl.geo...@rackspace.com ---
Currently this spec file builds the main package with python2, and a subpackage
with python3. The with_python3 macro controls whether the python3 subpackage
is built at all.
I'd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078
Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230161
William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078
--- Comment #12 from Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net ---
Updated! Thanks, Pete!
https://mhayden.fedorapeople.org/supernova-pkg-review/supernova.spec
https://mhayden.fedorapeople.org/supernova-pkg-review/supernova-2.0.9-2.fc22.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258062
Bug ID: 1258062
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-requestretry - Request-retry
wrap nodejs request to retry http(s) requests in case
of error
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258062
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1258056
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056
Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1258062
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039301
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
The only issue I see is that the latest version (2.6.1) is not packaged. Can
it be used, or is there a reason why 2.5.0 is necessary?
On a related note, it looks like 2.5.4 might fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Issues, in no particular order
- There is one bundled source file:
src/main/java/org/springframework/data/redis/connection/util/Base64.java
It carries a BSD license. It probably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056
Bug ID: 1258056
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-fg-lodash - FG variant of
lodash
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056
--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-fg-lodash.spec
SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-fg-lodash-0.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228203
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #4)
Issues, in no particular order
- There is one bundled source file:
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
