https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I only need the nodejs part at this moment. Browserify is not in Fedora and I
expect that it has many missing dependencies. I will look into browserify some
other time.
* Tue Sep 01 2015 Piotr Popieluc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151818
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-typeahead.js-0.10.5-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7878
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151818
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-typeahead.js-0.10.5-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14729
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242886
--- Comment #3 from bigswitch ---
One more thing. My understanding is that documentation is recommended to be put
to a subpackage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812
--- Comment #3 from bigswitch ---
1. URL should point to package pypi page
2. Do you need to disable pbr version determination mechanism on build? For
example,
https://github.com/openstack-packages/neutron/blob/4bc2d731766a50fb0d6733bbd8e0a2bd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061732
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||0.3.4-1.fc23
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061732
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-restful-0.3.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258258
Bug 1258258 depends on bug 1242091, which changed state.
Bug 1242091 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-smart-buffer - A smarter Buffer
that keeps track of its own read and write positions while growing endlessly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224800
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242090
Bug 1242090 depends on bug 1242091, which changed state.
Bug 1242091 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-smart-buffer - A smarter Buffer
that keeps track of its own read and write positions while growing endlessly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256054
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979166
Bug 979166 depends on bug 1026440, which changed state.
Bug 1026440 Summary: Please update antlr3 to version 3.5.1 and include C++
runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026440
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #32
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #20 from Jens Peters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #19 from Jens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
Please update the SPEC and Source RPM with:
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505
--- Comment #6 from Will Woods ---
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #5)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Notes:
>
> * The license file is not included in the module packages, but they can be
> installed without the main package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245351
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252831
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078
Major Hayden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Major
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
I think the only question is whether we should ship the top level lolex.js or
just the one in src?
The top level one is intended for serving to browsers (it won't be used in node
if you require lolex) and is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256383
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257329
John Trowbridge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jtrowbri@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078
--- Comment #14 from Pete Travis ---
Building with python3 is categorically part of the general effort to migrate to
python3. The python packaging guidelines don't make a distinction between
modules and executables, stating:
"""
In Fedora we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256338
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich ---
1) Some files seem to be under BSD, LGPLv2+ and also under MIT/X11 license
(according to licensecheck)
2) Missing gtk-update-icon-cache call in %postun and %posttrans for
kf5-akonadi-contact
3) Shouldn't yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256351
--- Comment #2 from Jan Grulich ---
1) Some files seems to be also under GPLv2+
2) Use either only %{buildroot} or only $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
3) Invalid URL
4) Shouldn't you use %config for /etc/xdg/akonadi.categories?
5) /etc/xdg/akonadi/mysql-loca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Pio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256435
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com |fedora-review+
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258159
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Sorry, got a bit sloppy with copy+paste after xx node modules..
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lolex.spec
SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lolex-1.3.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
--- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Now with correct link.
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-mkfiletree.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-mkfiletree-1.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
--- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch ---
updated and added license:
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-mkfiletree.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-mkfiletree-1.0.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258137
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-run-parallel-limit-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14712
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258137
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-run-parallel-limit-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14709
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258137
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258151
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-async-cache-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14708
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258162
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-after-0.8.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14706
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258151
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258151
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-async-cache-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14705
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258241
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-basic-auth-parser-0.0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14704
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258162
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-after-0.8.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14703
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258162
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258241
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-basic-auth-parser-0.0.2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14701
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258241
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258241
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-basic-auth-parser-0.0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14700
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256351
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256338
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256380
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256386
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256472
--- Comment #1 from Jan Grulich ---
1) License should be LGPLv2+ (source files are under LGPLv2+ while the license
file is GPLv2+)
2) Use %license for the license file
3) Typo in summary
4) Maybe you should use %config for /etc/xdg/kde.categor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258156
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from Pio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257595
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242090
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256383
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256380
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242090
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-socks-client-1.1.4-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14697
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258160
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1258222
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242090
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-socks-client-1.1.4-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14696
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242090
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242090
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-socks-client-1.1.4-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14695
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande ---
Some tests fail.
Please, check them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256386
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256472
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257595
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
License file is not included in package, and you need to update to 1.0.1 which
also includes your patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258217
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258572
Sergio Durigan Junior changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergi...@redhat.com
A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242011
Brian Demers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|python-UcsSdk-0.8.2.4-1.fc2 |python-UcsSdk-0.8.2.5-1.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246199
--- Comment #3 from hgue...@redhat.com ---
@Jakub: could you update the src,rpm too?
* drop the Group tag, unused now
* please switch to python versioned macros
* we need to review the python-rdoupdate package (same fixes should be applied
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
scalasca-2.2.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231427
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
COPASI-4.16-0.13.20150817git3bc4e9.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251459
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-pem-1.8.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the update, you can install it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc23 has been pushed to the
Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.\nIf you want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242011
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-UcsSdk-0.8.2.5-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can inst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rackspace-auth-openstack-1.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
java-mersenne-twister-20-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257619
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-julienschmidt-httprouter-1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.\nIf you want to test the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257908
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Devel-GoFaster-0.000-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256344
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Log-Any-IfLOG-0.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can ins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761
--- Comment #5 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
1- You must use the %license macro in %%files for the license text.
DONE
2- Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/qt5
FIXED -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224800
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
xfce-bluetooth-0-0.4.20150130git.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7872
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224800
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
xfce-bluetooth-0-0.4.20150130git.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14689
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258430
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258430
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258241
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258241
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258162
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258162
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258151
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250833
--- Comment #7 from L.L.Robinson ---
new versions
Spec URL: http://therobinsonfamily.net/SPECS/helm.spec
SRPM URL: http://therobinsonfamily.net/SRPMS/helm-0.4.1-7.fc22.src.rpm
Build info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo