https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259333
--- Comment #10 from Lukas Bezdicka ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: python-mox3
New Branches: f22 f23
Owners: social apevec chandankumar
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260313
Jens Lody changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@jenslody.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211654
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||998251
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970285
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||998251
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260219
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-mallard-ducktype-0.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15253
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260219
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260219
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-mallard-ducktype-0.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15254
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256054
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
You can switch to the %license when importing: cblrpm diff can help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259061
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256054
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
I opened https://github.com/haskell/network-uri/pull/20
for the typo in the description.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241632
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260064
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|unspecified |low
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243052
--- Comment #14 from Javier Peña ---
Fixed now. Updated files:
SPEC: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-futurist/python-futurist.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256054
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236364
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen ---
Thanks, sorry I had missed you comment.
Updated:
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-comonad/ghc-comonad.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
Bug ID: 1260575
Summary: Review Request: python-ordered-set - A Custom
MutableSet that remembers its order
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng ---
1. SERIOUS: ExcludeArch. It doesn't support big endian! Don't forget MIPS,
since MIPS is going to be added as a secondary arch.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219288
--- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý ---
SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-marshmallow-2.0.0b5-2.fc22.src.rpm
SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-marshmallow.spec
I uncommented that one line in %files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260375
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
There's no endianess issue as that file is only use on big endian machines. On
little endian machines the layer above (see pbf_reader.hpp for example) just
does a memcpy instead. I've tested
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238755
Wim Taymans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260038
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219288
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1260575
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260133
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1219288
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
Valentin Gologuzov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
--- Comment #2 from François Kooman ---
Spec URL: https://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/php-phpseclib/php-phpseclib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/php-phpseclib/php-phpseclib-2.0.0-4.fc22.src.rpm
COPR build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
--- Comment #1 from Valentin Gologuzov ---
Issues
==
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260038
--- Comment #3 from Javier Peña ---
Thanks for the review Matthias. I have uploaded the fixed specs:
SPEC: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-XStatic-mdi/python-XStatic-mdi.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260289
hgue...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hgue...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
François Kooman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet ---
@François, please don't build for EPEL-6 for now, else you will be hit by bug
#1260315 (and this package is needed by phpMyAdmin 4.4 which is only in Fedora
and EPEL-7)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258111
--- Comment #8 from François Kooman ---
Okay, I'll leave el6 for now, thanks for the warning!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182
Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state.
Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259532
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260038
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089213
hgue...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260133
--- Comment #3 from Javier Peña ---
Thanks for the review. I have updated the spec:
SPEC:
https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-XStatic-bootswatch/python-XStatic-bootswatch.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260133
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260133
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260290
--- Comment #1 from Chandan Kumar ---
Hello mrunge,
Here is the updated
SPEC file:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-XStatic-roboto-fontface.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
Valentin Gologuzov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191319
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260038
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Thanks much for the review!
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> - License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license
Indeed. fixed.
>
> - Why you use 'rm -rf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260313
--- Comment #5 from Brian Monroe ---
Thanks Jens,
I saw those sections on headers and libs files, but didn't fully understand it.
I'll go through the fedora-review and fix all the issues.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260289
--- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme ---
Can you be more specific? I just launch pyp2rpm > 2.0 and the only noticeable
differences I found was about python 2 (which is not supported by this package)
and the URL points to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258201
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260219
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258200
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258405
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme ---
- Remove upstream's egg-info
- Please fetch the license here and add it as a source:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Robpol86/colorclass/master/LICENSE
Package Review
==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258147
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-multiline-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258201
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-deep-equal-1.0.1-1.fc23, nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-9.fc23,
nodejs-function-bind-1.0.2-1.fc23, nodejs-has-1.0.1-1.fc23,
nodejs-tap-0.4.4-6.fc23, nodejs-tape-4.2.0-1.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258200
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-deep-equal-1.0.1-1.fc23, nodejs-difflet-0.2.3-9.fc23,
nodejs-function-bind-1.0.2-1.fc23, nodejs-has-1.0.1-1.fc23,
nodejs-tap-0.4.4-6.fc23,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260219
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-mallard-ducktype-0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-progress-stream-1.1.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259851
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259851
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
cppformat-1.1.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10992676
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260845
Bug ID: 1260845
Summary: Review Request: sshguard - Protect hosts from
brute-force attacks
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260250
Bruno Wolff III changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||501993
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338
Bug 1257338 depends on bug 1257340, which changed state.
Bug 1257340 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to
the same line in the terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-single-line-log-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259852
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
NON blocking issues:
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
Please, consider to upgrading to 2.2.0 or better 2.3.0
Suggestion:
Please,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259852
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260038
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260133
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260133
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260038
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
cppformat-1.1.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258147
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-multiline-1.0.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-progress-stream-1.1.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258201
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-function-bind-1.0.2-1.fc21, nodejs-has-1.0.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to
the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258200
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-function-bind-1.0.2-1.fc21, nodejs-has-1.0.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to
the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235949
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
@ Roman
Can you skip/leave this and take instead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691
--- Comment #36 from David Nichols ---
the scm repo has moved to github; the build has been updated accordingly:
Spec URL: http://qore.org/srpms/qore.spec
SRPM URL: http://qore.org/srpms/qore-0.8.11.1-7.fc22.src.rpm
koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259851
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
NON blocking issues:
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259852
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259851
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
WARNING: No description provided.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235949
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1235950 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235950
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1235949 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
cppformat-1.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you
want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974725
--- Comment #17 from Ben Boeckel ---
Hrm. The upload is done by a script. I'll have to look into why it is acting
weird.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo