https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280343
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
I updated to package. After discussion with upstream, I install the misc/bidi
file into urxvt plugin directory and I package it into a sub-package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274503
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-make-arrow-function-1.1.0-1.fc23,
nodejs-make-generator-function-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433
Bug 995433 depends on bug 1258274, which changed state.
Bug 1258274 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jaxrpc-api - The Java API for
XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274504
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-make-arrow-function-1.1.0-1.fc23,
nodejs-make-generator-function-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433
Bug 995433 depends on bug 995435, which changed state.
Bug 995435 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-transaction-api - Java JTA 1.2
API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274501
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-is-symbol-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can insta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259002
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
rudiments-0.53-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274503
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274504
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274501
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259002
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664
Bug ID: 1281664
Summary: Review Request: gap-pkg-smallsemi - GAP library of
small semigroups
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to John Dulaney from comment #10)
> Is this still a thing? If I get no response in a week, I'm going to submit
> my own review.
I think you can go ahead. Nothing much has happene
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275643
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
I agree, you need to revise the guideline...
Regarding that test error, I found the culprit, obviously it's the unexpected
type mismatch. NaN -> Inf.
I will upload a new SRPM soon,
Thanks!
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259460
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-server-1.0.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-host-1.0.0-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #20 from Andy Lutomirski ---
u2f-hidraw-policy is now in f22 and f23 stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267189
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
zbyszek's scratch build of antimony-0.9.0-0.4.2015git12e9f8.fc23.src.rpm
for f23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11808959
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-host-1.0.0-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259460
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
libu2f-server-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259460
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277100
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277100
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Cache-LRU-0.04-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #12 from John Dulaney ---
You are still failing rpmlint:
Checking: ola-0.9.8-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm
ola-devel-0.9.8-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm
python2-ola-0.9.8-3.fc23.noarch.rpm
ola-rdm-tests-0.9.8-3.fc23.noarch.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273164
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Requested at https://github.com/kof/node-argsparser/issues/8.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249786
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
Rawhide build was failed, but all depencies are in place:
Package python3-setuptools-18.5-2.fc24.noarch is already installed, skipping.
Dependencies resolved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249786
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
williamjmorenor's scratch build of kaaedit-0.44.0-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11808030
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #12 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #11)
> I am interested in reviewing hypre but the srpm is not available.
>
> Coud you, please, fix this? :-)
Oh dear; I hadn't seen this, sorry. I've missed a number of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #11 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
i'm not exactly sure how it failed... or how i could resolve it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270394
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #23 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
daveo's scratch build of ola-0.9.8-3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807396
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #9 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
disabled rpath again, I also made a separate noarch pacakge for the /usr/share
directories:
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/daveo/OLA/ola.git/plain/ola.spec?id=508d4526f7111eb18d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270394
--- Comment #22 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
raphgro's scratch build of sharpziplib-0.86.0-0.3.fc23.src.rpm for f23
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807378
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jdulaney's scratch build of micropython-1.5-0.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807404
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270394
--- Comment #21 from Raphael Groner ---
nant is currently b0rken in rawhide.
Use f23 - Task info:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807378
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jdulaney's scratch build of micropython-1.5-0.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807362
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270394
--- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner ---
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/sharpziplib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/sharpziplib-0.86.0-0.3.fc23.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraprojec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270394
--- Comment #19 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
raphgro's scratch build of sharpziplib-0.86.0-0.3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807329
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jdulaney's scratch build of micropython-1.5-0.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807259
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jdulaney's scratch build of micropython-1.2-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11807116
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdula...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880
--- Comment #18 from Julien Enselme ---
Created attachment 1093436
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1093436&action=edit
Correct the non-executable-scripts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880
--- Comment #17 from Julien Enselme ---
I found what the problem is: in the code you use to remove the shebang, you use
two times %{modname} instead of one (see the attach patch).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281562
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281562
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1103662
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281562
Bug ID: 1281562
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-os-tmpdir - Node.js os.tmpdir()
ponyfill
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970393
--- Comment #20 from Christopher Atherton ---
I've switched COPYING from %doc to %license. SPEC/SRPM have the same location,
but for convenience...
SPEC => https://www.dropbox.com/s/tp49pw6n5ycb4gc/foo2zjs.spec?dl=0
SRPM =>
https://www.dropbo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259002
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
rudiments-0.53-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c816143d56
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259002
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259002
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rudiments-0.53-4.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a87ff17999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Thanks for working on this!
We plan to build
- '%global pginstdir %{_libdir}/pgsql' -- this does not seem to be used
- Requires: postgresql-server(:MODULE_COMPAT_%{postgresql_major})
This won't work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #8 from John Dulaney ---
Checking: ola-0.9.8-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
ola-devel-0.9.8-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
python2-ola-0.9.8-2.fc23.noarch.rpm
ola-rdm-tests-0.9.8-2.fc23.noarch.rpm
ola-debuginfo-0.9.8-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270394
--- Comment #18 from Christian Dersch ---
So what is the current state? Doesn't build on rawhide now:
INFO: mock.py version 1.2.13 starting (python version = 2.7.8)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281538
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281538
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: javadoc - |Review Request: umlgraph -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281538
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|Diagrams
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281538
Bug ID: 1281538
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-websocket-api-1.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-be94439d02
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-jaxrpc-api-1.1.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1d54c3cb7e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
glassfish-transaction-api-1.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5f695e8315
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
Pavel Kajaba changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pkaj...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
--- Comment #1 from Pavel Raiskup ---
$ fedora-review -b 1281532
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1281532
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1281532
ERROR: 'Cannot find source rpm URL'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkaj...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #7 from John Dulaney ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
Better to fix the the issues that arise when you disable rpath.
Am looking at the new build.
Also, I note that if you do test builds, y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
Bug ID: 1281532
Summary: Review Request: Pagila - Example database for
PostgreSQL
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
daveo's scratch build of ola-0.9.8-2.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11805731
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267009
--- Comment #5 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
I have spoken with the developers and they say we would have to work with
symlinks but they are open to the idea.
also I made a new build where i fixed some stuff:
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267189
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #6)
> No matter if the module is only private or not, I don't think this can work.
> The module is currently in-importable, because _fabtypes is missi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215354
--- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
> Hi Richard,
>
> originally, i was going to name this package 'python-assimulo', then i chose
> just assimulo.
Ok, well it looks like you have a formal revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281245
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
tyrus-1.12-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-37ba0e669d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274501
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274501
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-is-symbol-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ae998ededf
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-is-sy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274501
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-is-symbol-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ae998ededf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
issues:
- Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
present.
Note: Package has .a files: nacl-arm-binutils. Illegal package name:
nacl-arm-binutils. Does not provide -stat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of nacl-arm-binutils-2.25.2-1.gitcde986c.fc23.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11805322
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #17 from gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/tyrus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281245
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-DBIx-Class-DeploymentHandler
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086
--- Comment #16 from marcindulak ---
I don't know why some of my scratch builds end up listed here.
Those are not the same ones as the next version below:
Spec URL: https://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/openmx/r02/openmx.spec
SRPM URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274501
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-is-symbol
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
If that's okay I'll try to do a review of the package manually.
Since my system is 32-bit.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272332
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270364
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks!
Request for new package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/1518
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/1519
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245255
Fotios Tsiadimos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Reference
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281315
--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch ---
Actually, one minor nit in addition. The summary and description are rather
poor. You might try to collaborate with upstream on improving them.
Nevertheless, this is not a blocker for a review, just a not.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281315
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
* Package naming
- This is tough one with regards to naming. The name according to naming
guidelines should be "rubygem-rubygems-mirror". I personally would be fine
with the shortened "rubygems-mir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267189
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
No matter if the module is only private or not, I don't think this can work.
The module is currently in-importable, because _fabtypes is missing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281315
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
vondruch's scratch build of rubygems-mirror-1.1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm for
f24-candidate completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11804389
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Ivan Afonichev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan.afonic...@gmail.com
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
