https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276926
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
btw /usr/share/nipy is used for nipy group packages like nibabel, nipype,
nilearn. So it's totally correct. But many thanks for review and clarification.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276926
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
hm, weird. I installed nipy-data and:
[brain@x1carbon nipy-0.4.0]$ python -c 'import nipy.utils;
print(nipy.utils.templates.version)'
nipy/__init__.py:25: UserWarning: Running the tests from the install di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276926
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
$ python -c 'import nipy.utils; print(nipy.utils.example_data.msg)'
nipy/__init__.py:25: UserWarning: Running the tests from the install directory
may trigger some failures
warnings.warn('Running the tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285074
--- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284527
--- Comment #18 from Vasant Hegde ---
Dan,
Thanks for the review.
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #16)
> - distro-wide CFLAGS are not honoured in the build -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags
Added "%{
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279650
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283907
--- Comment #19 from Rickard Lindberg ---
Ok, so I'm thinking the submission to f22 and f23 was maybe not right. I've
read the update policy but find it a bit difficult to interpret.
The reason for creating this package was so that the timeli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249543
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of eclipse-paho-mqtt-java-1.0.2-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11975159
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249543
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-paho-mqtt-java.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gil.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-paho-mqtt-java-1.0.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276938 (python-nipy)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276938
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1276871 (python-nibabel)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276910
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276910
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269539
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270385
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271802
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #24 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234654
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #28 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223293
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266804
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rpdb-0.1.5-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3ca4981c11
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rpdb-0.1.5-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9a75e55d17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284155
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jp...@redhat.com|rbar...@redhat.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276938
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276926
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284989
--- Comment #10 from John ---
about the openssl change:
I did a diff of the ciphers and found all to be included on F23 for the default
security level. see https://gist.github.com/fedpop/9c890cdd5a17332354fc I am
feeling ok about this change.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279191
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pyrfc3339-1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-61f17ca6c0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279191
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279191
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pyrfc3339-1.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14c9c2e8a6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please also add a comment about the license in the .spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282903
--- Comment #7 from Nalin Dahyabhai ---
I can sponsor. Package is in pretty good shape.
General notes:
Line 127 of the .spec file's mention of "devel.file-list" should probably be
changed to "unit-test-devel.file-list".
I needed to change th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
About license. I think I need to include PDDL to license lists because some
data licensed under this license.
http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/summary/
It's like Public Domain but for data. I wil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208695
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
liberasurecode-1.0.9-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273712
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
google-noto-cjk-fonts-1.004-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285112
Bug ID: 1285112
Summary: Review Request: DiffusionKurtosisFit - Code to
reconstruct the Diffusion Kurtosis Tensor from
Diffusion Weighted MRI
Product: Fedora
Ver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285112
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
Ali
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234649
--- Comment #12 from Adam Miller ---
If you still need a Fedora Packager Sponsor, I would be happy to sponsor you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234649
--- Comment #11 from Adam Miller ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234649
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285067
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285067
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284989
Clinton Minton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clintonmin...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285074
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285074
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232816
--- Comment #7 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Some issues:
There is a missing dependency: spdx-exceptions
Version is missing in changelog
Check section incorrect, should be: defence README.md | replace-require-self |
node
New versions license i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283907
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
python-humblewx-0.2.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d89c0c30ae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284989
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner ---
IMHO #11 from comment #6 is MUST as fedora-review tool enforces %license.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283907
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-humblewx-0.2.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d51e2a92ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283907
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284989
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
The wiki about Crypto, also recommended sending queries to:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/security
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284989
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
8. Remember to always bump Release: tag, and add appropriate %changelog
entries, even for review modifications
9. since you addressed removing the -protocol subpkg, may be worth adding an
upgrade path for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285074
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1285077
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285077
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Depen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Adam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285077
Bug ID: 1285077
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-test - (Un)CommonJS test runner
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285049
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
So per packaging rules the name should be lower case. Yes I know that there is
also a jsonselect module in the NPM registry, but according to the guidelines
if we wanted to package them both that would be a n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285049
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream sou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285074
Bug ID: 1285074
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-ansi-font - ANSI font styling
utils
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285074
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
--- Comment #4 from Sayan Chowdhury ---
SPEC file: https://sayanchowdhury.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/bugyou.spec
SRPM file:
https://sayanchowdhury.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bugyou-0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-is-my-json-valid
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #34 from James Hunt ---
procenv 0.43 has now been released.
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11971335
Files:
https://jamesodhunt.fedorapeople.org/packages/procenv/SHA512SUM
https://jamesodhunt.fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Thanks!
Update:
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lex-parser.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lex-parser-0.1.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285049
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #33 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jamesodhunt's scratch build of procenv-0.43-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11971335
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282903
--- Comment #6 from Sally ---
- updated spec, src.rpm here: https://github.com/sallyom/oci-register-stuff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
Review is based on Piotr's version. Issue:
* Should use %{__nodejs} to run node in %build and %check
* Needs BR on npm(test) to run tests [not yet packaged]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283907
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-humblewx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285049
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Yeah, sorry -- I pasted the wrong links. Try these, please:
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-JSONSelect/nodejs-JSONSelect.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
--- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Thank you, updated
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-is-my-json-valid.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-is-my-json-valid-2.12.3-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193210
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
sxc-0.8-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-555d019d06
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285067
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
Ali
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285067
Bug ID: 1285067
Summary: Review Request: python-pyxid - Python library for
interfacing with Cedrus XID and StimTracker devices
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I've added bootstrapping and building from source for second pass:
Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lex-parser.spec
SRPM URL:
https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-lex-parser-0.1.4-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283190
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284565
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285049
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285051
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1285057
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285057
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1285057
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285057
Bug ID: 1285057
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-json-parse-helpfulerror - A
drop-in replacement for JSON.parse that uses `jju` to
give helpful errors
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Zuzana Svetlikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Bug ID: 1285056
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-jju - A set of utilities to
work with JSON / JSON5 documents
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285051
Bug ID: 1285051
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-cjson - Commented JavaScript
Object Notation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285051
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284989
--- Comment #5 from John ---
Ok thanks Rex Dieter,
I addressed all of your suggestions I hope.
1. done
2. added. old versions did not support parallel make.
3. done
4. done
5. done
6. deleted
7. Made a note about celt071, deleted others.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245791
hgue...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment #8 is|1 |0
private|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285035
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tomh's scratch build of nodejs-gdal-0.8.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11970720
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285049
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced Bug
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
