https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170529
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170529
--- Comment #7 from Scott K Logan ---
Igor - It's been a few months. Can you at least ping back if you're interested
in keeping this review alive?
Thanks,
--scott
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500
--- Comment #8 from Scott K Logan ---
James - Christopher has been MIA on this review for a very long time now,
despite being pinged about it. If you are able, please take the review so we
can proceed.
--scott
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
zbyszek's scratch build of moose-3.0.2-0.4.fc24.beta.2.src.rpm for f22
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12179791
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8)
> > >
> > > [!]: If (and only if)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287435
--- Comment #7 from Randy Barlow ---
Hi Josef! I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291123 to
track adding the -doc package in case you are interested. I should find some
time to do it in the next few weeks. Thanks against f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269609
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
ari-backup-1.0.10-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-120a2062db
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski ---
License report
https://bitbucket.org/ijabz/jaudiotagger/issues/111/license-clarification
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/bup
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290450
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/exonerate
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291060
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt ---
A brief look:
Consider pointing the fedora-review tool at this ticket. It will download the
latest package from the "Spec URL:" and "SRPM URL:" lines, perform a local Mock
build and run lots of checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8)
> >
> > [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
> > license(s) in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
zbyszek's scratch build of moose-3.0.2-0.4.fc24.beta.2.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12178937
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I fired off some builds. F23 will probably fail because of libsbml.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
zbyszek's scratch build of moose-3.0.2-0.4.fc24.beta.2.src.rpm for f23 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12178938
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8)
> (fedora-review is not reliable in these days)
I run it with '-x CheckOwnDirs' and it's mostly OK...
> Generic:
> [!]: Package is licensed with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344
Pavel Alexeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1262378
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev ---
(In reply to Elder Marco from comment #2)
> Those directories belongs to plowshare package. Maybe, the package (and
> plowshare) must own the directory /usr/share/plowshare/modules. (?)
Sure. And package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo ---
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/javax/swing/event/EventListenerList.html
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/javax/swing/event/EventListenerList.html
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
EventListenerList.java provides two methods unavailable on JRE stuff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later) (with incorrect FSF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski ---
Yeah, I was having trouble with building on different platforms. I think it's
sorted now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Was a problem with javadoc plugin setting,
there are two choices:
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-javadoc-plugin
(and also unusefull maven-source-plugin)
or removing
sed -i -e /-Xdoclint:none/d pom.xml
the option
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
orion's scratch build of jaudiotagger-2.2.5-1.el7.src.rpm for f24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12177564
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
orion's scratch build of jaudiotagger-2.2.5-1.el7.src.rpm for f24 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12177532
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski ---
Thanks.
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jaudiotagger.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jaudiotagger-2.2.5-1.el7.src.rpm
* Sun Dec 13 2015 Orion Poplawski 2.2.5-1
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982753
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
orion's scratch build of jaudiotagger-2.2.5-1.el7.src.rpm for f24 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12177497
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #16 from Tom Hughes ---
New version with fully versioned requires:
Spec URL: http://tomh.fedorapeople.org//lodash.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomh.fedorapeople.org//lodash-3.10.1-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288719
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288827
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=120
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288832
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289006
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288835
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #15 from Tom Hughes ---
Tests require qunit by the way, which isn't currently available, and I can't
actually get them to run even if I install it locally, for reasons which are
not entirely clear...
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande ---
(fedora-review is not reliable in these days)
Review:
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -deve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
sagitter's scratch build of moose-3.0.2-0.3.fc24.beta.2.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12176821
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oh, stupid bug. Should be fixed now.
Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/moose.spec
SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/moose-3.0.2-0.3.fc24.beta.2.src.rpm
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
sagitter's scratch build of moose-3.0.2-0.2.fc24.beta.2.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12176320
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
--- Comment #21 from Tadej Janež ---
William, thanks again for the review and approval!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Thank you for the review!
I hope I fixed everything, but probably I misunterstood you and used too
complicated way to remove dotfiles from documentation. Is it possible to do it
easier? I did not find o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291081
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||php-wikimedia-composer-merg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291081
Bug ID: 1291081
Summary: Review Request: php-wikimedia-composer-merge-plugin -
Composer plugin to merge multiple composer.json files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246719
--- Comment #6 from Jeff Backus ---
Hi Christopher,
Just checking in. Any progress?
Regards,
Jeff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
Bug ID: 1291076
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-dashdash - A light, featureful
and explicit option parsing library for node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #14 from Tom Hughes ---
I guess per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
the situation with the removed functions comes under "If a package
supersedes/replaces an existing packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #13 from Tom Hughes ---
I believe all those modules require the base lodash package, which includes the
license. Maybe the missing release on the require is making it complain there?
I've added the release to the modules which are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #12 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Source checksums
https://github.com/lodash/lodash/archive/3.10.1/lodash-3.10.1.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
0e88207e5f90af4ce8790d6e1e7d09d2702d81bce0bafdc253d18c0a5b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #11 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Rpmlint
---
Checking: lodash-3.10.1-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
js-lodash-3.10.1-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
nodejs-lodash-3.10.1-1.fc24.noarch.rpm
nodejs-lodash-compat-3.10.1-1.fc24.noarc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288858
--- Comment #10 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291021
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Fixed. Links are the same.
I tried to figure out what happened with this program, but I cant fix crashing
=(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-mne-0.10-5.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5c687cbb72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291061
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
Ali
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291061
Bug ID: 1291061
Summary: Review Request: python-pyspike - Python library for
the numerical analysis of spiketrain similarity
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291060
Jiri Eischmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291060
Bug ID: 1291060
Summary: Review Request: purple-telegram - adds support for
Telegram to Pidgin
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277505
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
jssc-2.8.0-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
64 matches
Mail list logo
