https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295035
Bug ID: 1295035
Summary: Review Request: erlang-p1_pam - epam for ejabberd to
help with PAM authentication support
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295035
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1204119
--- Comment #1 from Randy Barl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mattia.verga@tisc |fedora-review+
|ali.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295037
Bug ID: 1295037
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-rewire - Easy dependency
injection for node.js unit testing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295037
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295037
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tomh's scratch build of nodejs-rewire-2.5.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12370294
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295040
Bug ID: 1295040
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-mock-fs - A configurable mock
file system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295040
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Depends On
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295037
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1295040
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Mat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293049
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mattia.verga@tisc |
|ali.it)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293058
Bug 1293058 depends on bug 1044425, which changed state.
Bug 1044425 Summary: nodejs-minimatch-3.0.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044425
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194923
Bug 1194923 depends on bug 1030898, which changed state.
Bug 1030898 Summary: nodejs-glob-6.0.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030898
What|Removed |Added
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
Bug ID: 1295055
Summary: Review Request: python-flake8-import-order - Flake8
plugin for checking order of imports in Python code
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201870
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295057
Bug ID: 1295057
Summary: Review Request: vdr-epgfixer - VDR plugin for doing
extra fixing of EPG data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(NON blocking) Issues:
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is inclu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
... forgot remove unnecessary "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in install section
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
> found: "
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344
Pavel Alexeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dyske...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-0.282.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12374312
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274512
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274512
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293049
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266939
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
kf5-purpose-1.0-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1e71a5a193
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/plasma-user-manager
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kf5-libkipi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274512
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-string-dot-prototype-dot-trim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274512
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Bug 1285056 depends on bug 1014483, which changed state.
Bug 1014483 Summary: nodejs-js-yaml-3.4.6 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014483
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
Mark McKinstry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmcki...@umich.edu
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442
--- Comment #6 from Mark McKinstry ---
Regarding the three issues, they have been fixed.
Regarding the old FSF address and lack of license text in the upstream project:
https://github.com/yoshiki/yaml-mode/pull/36
spec:
https://mmckinst.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295069
Bug ID: 1295069
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-readdir-scoped-modules - Like
fs.readdir but handling @org/module dirs as if they
were a single entry
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295069
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285057
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295069
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tomh's scratch build of nodejs-readdir-scoped-modules-1.0.2-1.fc23.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12377477
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285056
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
The BR on nodejs-devel is incorrect for a noarch extension.
Fedora 19 is EOL so there's no need for an ifdef to support it.
The tests are not included, let along run. The js-yaml package is now updated
in r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285057
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285057
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285057
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
The BR on nodejs-devel is incorrect for a noarch extension.
Fedora 19 is EOL so there's no need for an ifdef to support it.
The test BRs have bogus npm format version numbers, and the jslint one isn't
reall
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201870
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä ---
Thanks for the review.
License file inclusion already reported upstream:
https://github.com/public/flake8-import-order/pull/52
Rest of the license stuff reported as well, ASL 2.0 is almost certainly a bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Bug ID: 1295075
Summary: Review Request: erlang-cache_tab - Erlang cache table
application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294587
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1295075
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1204119
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from gil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from gil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
plasma-user-manager-5.5.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcae5b09bd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
plasma-user-manager-5.5.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-014c5d0d08
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12378740
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295055
--- Comment #7 from Ville Skyttä ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289726
Will do probably tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442
--- Comment #8 from Mark McKinstry ---
Thanks gil! I'll get bookkeeper taken care of today.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837
--- Comment #14 from Tadej Janež ---
Hi Benjamin,
thanks for packaging up BorgBackup!
I have two short comments/suggestions:
1. Change the URL to https://borgbackup.readthedocs.org/ as it is deemed as the
project's main web site (https://bo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294865
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Ala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jenslody's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-244.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12378907
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
--- Comment #3 from Mark McKinstry ---
Issues
==
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/maven-
poms/bookkeeper(bookkeeper-java), /usr/share/jav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
--- Comment #2 from Mark McKinstry ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Mark McKinstry from comment #3)
> Issues
> ==
>
> [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/maven-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mark McKinstry from comment #3)
>
> > [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
> >
> > AFAICT the tests aren't run in the build section?
>
> ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8-0.282.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12380190
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289604
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mark McKinstry from comment #3)
> > Issues
> > ==
> >
> > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> > Note
67 matches
Mail list logo
