https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1297174 (spectacle)
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297174
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297174
Bug ID: 1297174
Summary: Review Request: spectacle - Screenshot capture utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297174
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rdieter's scratch build of spectacle-15.12.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12489326
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292287
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285412
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297150
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jcline's scratch build of erlang-p1_xml-1.1.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12488700
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297150
Bug ID: 1297150
Summary: Review Request: erlang-p1_xml - Fast Expat based
Erlang XML parsing and manipulation library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #4)
> Thanks a lot for your review for all my three packages! Your input is very
> helpful for me.
I'm happy to help.
> I continuously improve my RPM s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #3)
> > I think you should remove the "main" package which only contains the readme
> > and license files, and simply include those files in both -doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #17)
> > %defattr(-,root,root,-) is unnecessary
> > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions].
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/erlang-cache_tab
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278157
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-uid-safe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|erlan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy Cline ---
Just for your reference since this resulted in some pretty serious changes:
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/erlang-cache_tab.spec
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/erlang-cache_tab-1.0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
Pavel Alexeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
python-music21-2.2.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879933
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev ---
New version.
Changes:
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/b06c8595ba1157e195dd4db4549476ec869e28e3
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/b06c8595ba1157e195dd4db4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
polyglot-chess-1.4-5.20140902gitf46ee06.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b099b47360
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285412
--- Comment #8 from Jared Smith ---
Yes, I just returned from vacation, and I'd be happy to use the updated spec
provided by Piotr during my absence.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292287
--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith ---
Updated.
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-absolute/nodejs-is-absolute.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-absolute/nodejs-is-absolute-0.2.3-3.fc24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879933
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of caelum-0.6.2-0.1.git.e776a80.fc23.src.rpm for f23
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12487488
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #17 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> %defattr(-,root,root,-) is unnecessary
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions].
OK, I hope it won't break RHEL/CentOS 6/7. Probably I should dro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294278
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
I think than you can continue this review and focus packaging guidelines for
Python, you must provide a python2 subpackage for Fedora, the python-provides
macro is redirectin python-name to python2-name f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|polyglot-chess |
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279175
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Detiste ---
> %{?dist}
I First though it was there for SuSE support; the noticed it in Fedora doc but
forgot to put it back.
> This will give you a: innoextract-1.5-4.fc24 build.
Upstream told me today he want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
%defattr(-,root,root,-) is unnecessary
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions].
Requires: systemd-units → systemd-units has been merge
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295108
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mycli
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295127
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/awscli
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/polyglot-chess
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System ---
pdf-stapler-0.3.3-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
python-nsdf-0.0-2.git9621ced.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #26 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #48 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294275
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
enki-15.11.0-2.el7 python-qutepart-2.2.2-3.el7 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c3e2a2e9f9
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273601
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
enki-15.11.0-2.el7 python-qutepart-2.2.2-3.el7 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c3e2a2e9f9
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295127
--- Comment #15 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
Thanks :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295127
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295152
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-wcwidth-0.1.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295154
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-prompt_toolkit-0.57-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295217
--- Comment #3 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> I think you should remove the "main" package which only contains the readme
> and license files, and simply include those files in both -doc and -devel.
How I can remove the main package? I haven't fou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295152
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-wcwidth-0.1.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295154
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-prompt_toolkit-0.57-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294275
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande ---
Okay.
Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-ivi/python-ivi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-ivi/python-ivi-0.14.9-3.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rbarlow's scratch build of erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-3.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12484437
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--- Comment #4 from Roman Tsisyk ---
> You should use %license for COPYING.md
> [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text].
Fixed.
> Spec file name does not match srpm file name (it's missing the dash).
Fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295127
--- Comment #13 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
Thanks for the suggestions :)
I've made a new version:
Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/aws/awscli.spec
SRPM URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/aws/awscli-1.9.17-3.fc23.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
enki-15.11.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-35eb73f03b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=122
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
enki-15.11.0-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f154dc4371
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289979
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294211
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler ---
I don't see how such a simple compat package "complicates things" in any way.
You don't have to do the review if you don't like this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jcline's scratch build of erlang-p1_cache_tab-1.0.1-3.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12484003
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rtsisyk's scratch build of lua-fun-0.1.2-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12484090
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790
--- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Anyway, I don't expect any free cycles anytime soon, but I'll keep an eye on
this review and take it up again when I have the time if no one else has until
then.
Cheers,
Ankur
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293045
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790
--- Comment #25 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hrm, I thought we'd spoken over IRC and I'd informed you that I was going to be
on holiday all through December - and I'd asked which review you wanted me to
do first etc. since I'd taken up tw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294275
--- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme ---
> It is thanks to %{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{pname}}
python_provide is just meant to add `Provide: python-ivi` to the subpackage for
the default python implementation (python2 for now).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #15 from Roman Tsisyk ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #13)
Thanks you for you review!
> %global __strip /bin/true might work.
Sorry, this hack doesn't work for me :(
> Don't repeat the package name in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rtsisyk's scratch build of tarantool-1.6.8.294-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12483677
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293045
--- Comment #4 from Mohammed Isam ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> You could %exlude %{_pkgdocdir}/COPYING to avoid duplicated file (and a
> warning from rpmlint).
Fixed.
> Unfortunately you violate one signifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295127
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande ---
- topictags.py file is licensed with a MIT license.
Please, update License tag.
- /usr/share/zsh/site-functions and /usr/share/zsh are directories already
owned by 'zsh'. Since zsh is a recommended
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rbarlow's scratch build of erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-3.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12483241
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295075
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293156
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295127
--- Comment #11 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
Thanks for the suggestions :)
I've made a new version:
Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/aws/awscli.spec
SRPM URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/aws/awscli-1.9.17-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279093
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Reques: smartirc4net |Review Request:
|- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293156
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/lx/lxqt-sudo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/lx/lxqt-sudo-0.10.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
* Sat Jan 09 2016 Raphael Groner <> - 0.10.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294275
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #3)
> - From setup.py and COPYING files, I think the package is under MIT.
> However, the License fields states BSD. Can you correct this?
> - Python2 version shou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331
--- Comment #9 from Randy Barlow ---
With this spec there is one error and one warning, and I think we can ignore
both:
Checking: erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm
erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-3.fc24.src.rpm
erlang-oauth2.x86_64: E: no-b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rbarlow's scratch build of erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-3.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12482253
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331
--- Comment #7 from Randy Barlow ---
I have one more change on the spec file, to disable the tests on i686 due to a
known erlang-eunit bug.
Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-oauth2.spec
SRPM URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294331
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rbarlow's scratch build of erlang-oauth2-0.6.0-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12482129
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288804
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288804
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I thought so, but I don't know enough about the codebase to decide if gco
dependency is mandatory, or can maybe replaced by something else, etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288804
--- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme ---
> It's usually helpful to read older comments...
OK, just read the closed deps. From what I understand, this review should be
closed as CANTFIX, no?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293075
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(projects.rg@smart |
|.ms)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294211
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
So far, only calligra and libkgeomap still need it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279175
--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi Alexandre,
I just noticed that your .spec has:
Release: 3
instead of:
Release: 3%{?dist}
This is against the guidelines, and more importantly causes problems when
sharing the spec between rele
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278964
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263821
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278963
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293735
Dmitry Mikhirev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288804
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
It's usually helpful to read older comments...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294211
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
Why do we need marble-widget still with Qt4 support? I fear a compat package
would complicate things a lot. Please tell what packages depend on it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289070
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
One part of the review is checking if the software works. To do that, the
reviewer has to know what the software is supposed to be used for. You cannot
expect reviewers to do research on a we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209974
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|projects...@sma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294275
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|sanjay.an...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You are
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
