https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
Roman Tsisyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
Roman Tsisyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
Roman Tsisyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--- Comment #9 from Roman Ts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--- Comment #8 from Roman Tsisyk ---
Thanks a lot! I see that I need to choose package collections for my new pkgdb
request. Should this package go to master (=rawhide?) or it is also possible to
select, say, EPEL7?
https://fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299179
Bug ID: 1299179
Summary: Review Request: editorconfig - tools for text editors
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965431
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
barracks510's scratch build of editorconfig-0.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12584281
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965417
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
barracks510's scratch build of editorconfig-0.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12584281
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965431
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
barracks510's scratch build of editorconfig-0.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12584257
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965417
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
barracks510's scratch build of editorconfig-0.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12584257
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299074
--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith ---
Updated:
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-unicode-length/nodejs-unicode-length.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-unicode-length/nodejs-unicode-length-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128101
Bug 1128101 depends on bug 1128100, which changed state.
Bug 1128100 Summary: Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various
text markups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128100
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128101
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1169493 (python-markups)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128100
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169493
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1128101
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169498
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||comzer...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128101
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299124
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-get-stream
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295230
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/hawaii-workspace
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288731
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/os-autoinst
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273133
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-events-to-array
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244196
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1108340 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #14 from Julien Enselme ---
> According to logs its at least does not fail:
> + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
But according to the logs, it doesn't launch any tests. So I don't see the
point of launching it. There are tests in th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295478
--- Comment #2 from Christian Dersch ---
Any news on this? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299147
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Twilio-API-0.18-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290530
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
smtpping-1.1.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263941
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
tayga-0.9.2-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292216
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libwhirlpool-1.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293075
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
lximage-qt-0.4.0-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298511
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263941
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
tayga-0.9.2-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290530
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
smtpping-1.1.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292392
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #25 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292216
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
libwhirlpool-1.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Twilio-API-0.18-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263941
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
tayga-0.9.2-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296974
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290530
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292216
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
libwhirlpool-1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #10)
> > You should also include %check section
>
> Since there is no test, I don't think it is relevant.
Why you think so?
According to logs its at least does no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of python-recommonmark-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for
rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12579171
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299038
--- Comment #1 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://clime.cz/copr/1.4/copr-prune-repo.spec
SRPM URL: http://clime.cz/copr/1.4/copr-prune-repo-1.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
An updated version that refreshes dnf cache each time the script is called a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of python-recommonmark-0.4.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12579137
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #10 from Julien Enselme ---
> Possible you are right and it may be equal... Is not?
As far as I know it is equal. The package wouldn't pull python3-devel in the
other case. I just prefer to put every requires in the proper subpack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
emacs-yaml-mode-0.0.12-2.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 5.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1b94744ebc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mattia's scratch build of astrometry-0.66-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12578072
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #8 from Mattia Verga ---
Spec URL: http://www.coolbits.it/fedora/astrometry.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.coolbits.it/fedora/astrometry-0.66-1.fc23.src.rpm
* Sat Jan 16 2016 Mattia Verga - 0.66-1
- Correct license to BSD
- Upgrade to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev ---
You should also include %check section and do not include license separate from
upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #7)
> > Why binaries placed ony in python3 package?
>
> The python2 and python3 binaries should work the same. According to the
> guidelines, I may add them in onl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299124
--- Comment #3 from Parag Nemade ---
Tom, Thank you for this quick review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #7 from Mattia Verga ---
I confirm that building on F23 works, Rawhide fails... reported upstream
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/astrometry/aDCjhfMYhpE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299146
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
fszymanski's scratch build of python-epub-0.5.2-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12577081
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
--- Comment #21 from Mattia Verga ---
done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299147
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299147
Bug ID: 1299147
Summary: Review Request: kpmcore - Library for managing
partitions by KDE programs.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299146
Filip Szymański changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299146
Bug ID: 1299146
Summary: Review Request: python-epub - Python library for
reading EPUB files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299074
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
There's no need to include coffeelint.json in the built package - that's just
configuration for linting the source.
Other than that it needs a fixdep for chalk as our one is too old, and also for
punycode as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299074
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299124
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299124
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292216
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263941
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|NEXTREL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299074
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299124
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
--- Comment #20 from Kevin Kofler ---
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NWPAGLMY6HJTN6VYYFMH3US6ZFDD7PZK/
> Actually the only package that depends on KPMcore is kde-partitionmanager.
Calamares
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
--- Comment #19 from Tom Hughes ---
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process for details - it's
basically a new review aimed at ensuring the obsoletes etc are right.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
--- Comment #18 from Tom Hughes ---
There shouldn't be any need for that - a rename review should be enough.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
--- Comment #17 from Mattia Verga ---
Should I fill another review request with lowercase name and retire KPMcore
after the new package will be approved?
Or there's the way to rename the existing one? Actually the only package that
depends on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299127
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mattia's scratch build of virtualplanet-1.0-5.20151220svn.fc23.src.rpm for
rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12575431
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
Block
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #6 from Mattia Verga ---
...forgot what I said, I messed up with licenses. It's BSD NO advertising,
you're right.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
daveo's scratch build of qlcplus-4.10.2b-2.fc23.src.rpm for f24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12574662
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #5 from Mattia Verga ---
License text shipped with sources is like this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:BSD?rd=Licensing/BSD#BSDwithAdvertising
See LICENSE file in sources main directory.
For the build failure in rawhid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mattia's scratch build of ccdciel-0.2.0-10.20160105svn.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12574929
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mattia's scratch build of astrometry-0.65-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12574968
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
emacs-yaml-mode-0.0.12-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
--- Comment #9 from Mattia Verga ---
Spec URL: http://coolbits.it/fedora/ccdciel.spec
SRPM URL: http://coolbits.it/fedora/ccdciel-0.2.0-10.20160105svn.fc23.src.rpm
Sorry, wrong revision number after cut/paste...
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
--- Comment #8 from Mattia Verga ---
Spec URL: http://coolbits.it/fedora/ccdciel.spec
SRPM URL: http://coolbits.it/fedora/ccdciel-0.2.0-9.20160105svn.fc23.src.rpm
* Sat Jan 16 2016 Mattia Verga - 0.2.0-10.20160105svn
- Moved tests into %%che
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch ---
Btw: Are you sure license is BSD with advertising, not normal 3 clause BSD?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lupi...@mailbox.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
lupinix's scratch build of astrometry-0.65-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12574737
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
--- Comment #7 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
Spec URL: https://bewaar.me/fedora/qlcplus/4.10.2b-2/qlcplus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bewaar.me/fedora/qlcplus/4.10.2b-2/qlcplus-4.10.2b-2.fc23.src.rpm
New revision, it fixes some weak dependencies and cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
Bug ID: 1299139
Summary: Review Request: astrometry - Tools from Astrometry.net
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||115 (Astronomy-SIG)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155058
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|punto...@libero.it |
Assignee|punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155058
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
Referenced Bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290231
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290231
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-nifti-0.0.2-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295128
Bug 1295128 depends on bug 1134005, which changed state.
Bug 1134005 Summary: python-configobj-5.0.6 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134005
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
Dave Olsthoorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: qlcplus - Q |Review Request: qlcplus -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
--- Comment #7 from Christian Dersch ---
Package already looks good, but needs some small fixes before i'll approve:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
--- Comment #6 from Dave Olsthoorn ---
> libqlcpluswebaccess.so.1 contains GPLv2+ code, that means you have to
> re-license libqlcpluswebaccess.so under GPLv2+. Your binary linked with
> shared librarylibqlcpluswebaccess.so => the binary also
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
