https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #10 from Mattia Verga ---
Spec URL: http://www.coolbits.it/fedora/astrometry.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.coolbits.it/fedora/astrometry-0.66-2.fc23.src.rpm
* Sun Jan 17 2016 Mattia Verga - 0.66-2
- -devel and -static are not noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mattia's scratch build of astrometry-0.66-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12584799
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299074
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298715
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
I understand that policy for services that run with root access. But how to do
those %systemd_ macros for the dynamical user services?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
Avner BenHanoch changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/Mellanox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-binutils-2.24-7.git1d8592c.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292392
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libpwiz-3.0.9283-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292216
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
libwhirlpool-1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297527
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-WWW-Twilio-API-0.18-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263821
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278964
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296974
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-beanbag-1.9.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263941
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
tayga-0.9.2-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293075
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
lximage-qt-0.4.0-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278963
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298511
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
fvsp-0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290530
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
smtpping-1.1.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294467
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Jan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #14)
> > According to logs its at least does not fail:
> > + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test
>
> But according to the logs, it doesn't launch any tests.
> Accordi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #16 from Julien Enselme ---
> Does run nothing but require addition dependency? :)
> docutil mentioned as dep even in setup.py from pupi tarball.
It isn't a build deps in the SPEC so when you try to run the test and it is not
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of rigsofrods-0.4.6.0-0.4.git.23c619a.fc23.src.rpm for
rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12586298
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev ---
Now it fails to test because you forgot add python2-CommonMark and
python3-CommonMark as BuildRequires:
+ cd recommonmark-7ca5247b342e755ce5294d43b5fef68afd90028e
+ py.test-3.4 .
=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of rigsofrods-0.4.6.0-0.4.git.23c619a.fc23.src.rpm for
rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12586406
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of rigsofrods-0.4.6.0-0.4.git.23c619a.fc23.src.rpm for
f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12586642
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298715
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
So... it seems that systemd presets are non-functional for templates. I'm
pretty sure they worked at one point, but seem broken now:
$ systemctl preset getty@.service
Failed to execute opera
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jujens's scratch build of python-recommonmark-0.4.0-3.git7ca5247.fc23.src.rpm
for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12587042
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456
--- Comment #19 from Julien Enselme ---
This time it should be good (correction done without a change of revision):
SPEC: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-recommonmark.spec
SRPM:
http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-recommonmark-.4.0-3.git7ca5247
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
pdf-stapler-0.3.3-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
python-nsdf-0.0-2.git9621ced.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294666
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sql-0.8-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296884
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Regexp-2015110201-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294666
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296884
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
Bloc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
- SPEC file must be named like software name.
fsvs --> fsvs.spec
- License is uncorrect.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL
- Why all these slash instead of a s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299147
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kpmcore
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ccdciel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of rigsofrods-0.4.6.0-0.4.git.23c619a.fc23.src.rpm for
f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12586904
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234210
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System ---
pdf-stapler-0.3.3-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296884
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Regexp-2015110201-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-nsdf-0.0-2.git9621ced.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294666
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sql-0.8-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System ---
py4j-0.9-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
ccdciel-0.2.0-10.20160105svn.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-132a0dbc91
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
hubbitus's scratch build of rigsofrods-0.4.6.0-0.5.git.23c619a.fc23.src.rpm for
f23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12587732
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295249
--- Comment #1 from Christian Dersch ---
Any news on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879928
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev ---
Major upgrade.
Now does not require angelscript and caelum as it is optional deps. So, review
may be continued.
Changes:
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/a00fa80810f3640dfadc56231e2e416
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #5 from Link Dupont ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> Oh, a game, nice. Even has appdata, even nicer.
>
> In the future, please link to plain text version of the spec file. HTML
> breaks fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
linkdupont's scratch build of endless-sky-0.8.10-5.fc23.src.rpm for f23
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12587946
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297281
--- Comment #7 from Link Dupont ---
(In reply to Link Dupont from comment #5)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> > - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
> > file-validate if th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247442
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Lots of issues discussed, but let's concentrate on the mongoose part, because
it seems most serious.
webaccess/src/mongoose.c is GPLv2 (not GPLv2+). This seems intentional, part of
dual lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Roman Tsisyk from comment #8)
> Thanks a lot! I see that I need to choose package collections for my new
> pkgdb request. Should this package go to master (=rawhide?) or it is al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286885
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@fastmail.com
--- Comment #1 from L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
--- Comment #55 from Gustavo Lima Chaves ---
Ping. Have you had the time to take a look, Paulo? I can bump the spec to newer
code before that if you prefer too, no big deal. We're closer to the 1st
release now, and it would be nice to have all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299305
Bug ID: 1299305
Summary: Review Request: erlang-p1_tls - TLS / SSL native
driver for Erlang / Elixir
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299313
Bug ID: 1299313
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-retry-allowed - Is retry
allowed for Error?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299313
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297215
Roman Tsisyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ro...@tsisyk.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297215
Roman Tsisyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||negativ...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293214
Sundeep Anand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|suan...@redhat.com
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293214
Sundeep Anand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293214
Sundeep Anand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295209
--- Comment #10 from Roman Tsisyk ---
I've made a minor release in the upstream after fixing some problem with the
stock Lua 5.3 from lua.org and have updated the wording a little bit.
Minor changes, nothing serious.
Spec URL:
https://gist.g
72 matches
Mail list logo
