https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307213
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rbarlow's scratch build of
erlang-rds13_xmlrpc-0-20150506git42e6e96a.1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12962928
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307213
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jer...@jcline.org
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307213
Bug ID: 1307213
Summary: Review Request: erlang-rds13_xmlrpc - Erlang XMLRPC
implementation with SSL, cookies, and authentication
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
This is a bit of a nitpick, but unless you plan on supporting < EL7, you could
use "%make_build" in place of "make %{?_smp_mflags}" and "%make_install" in
place of "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}".
Also,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307200
Daniel Vrátil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Depends On
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1123699
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1123699&action=edit
xchange-3.1.0 licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307200
Daniel Vrátil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307200
Bug ID: 1307200
Summary: Review Request: kjots - KDE Notes application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307189
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #1)
> Has anything changed since
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770371 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546
hmm..
> From a quick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307189
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
--- Comment #1 from Kev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304580
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307189
Bug ID: 1307189
Summary: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode
support for Intel graphics
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
John Zaitseff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(j.zaits...@zap.or |
|g.au)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim ---
> ... and http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/glassfish-websocket-api.git/
> aka mvn(javax.websocket:javax.websocket-client-api)
> ... and http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/tyrus.git provides
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #51 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
adamwill's scratch build of openqa-4.3-12.test.3.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12957773
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #50 from awill...@redhat.com ---
The .test.X scratch builds are me testing a complex patch I'm working on
upstream, not directly related to package review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306548
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #26 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
sdgathman's scratch build of cjdns-17.3-4.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12957404
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #6 from Jonny Heggheim ---
socketio-client depends on engineio-client-java that depdends on Java-WebSocket
version 1.3.0, we ship version 1.3.1 and it fails to compile.
Newer versions of engineio-client-java depends on okhttp-ws (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304571
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264337
Marcus Karlsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@acc.umu.se
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #49 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
adamwill's scratch build of openqa-4.3-12.test.1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12957108
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304571
--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith ---
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-arr-diff/nodejs-arr-diff.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-arr-diff/nodejs-arr-diff-2.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303451
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
Bug 1303764 depends on bug 1303451, which changed state.
Bug 1303451 Summary: Review Request: pusher-java-client - Pusher Java Client
Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303451
What|Removed |A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304154
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-is-path-in-cwd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306548
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-uri-path
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307149
Bug ID: 1307149
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-material - A material design
theme for MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #48 from awill...@redhat.com ---
A small note on the trigger stuff: it's not clean on upgrade from the old
system - the bit of RPM that says "remove this directory that's no longer
packaged" runs after the %triggerin script, so whe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #47 from awill...@redhat.com ---
On the UID/GID issue: upstream merged my patch to stop initdb attempting to
switch uids/gids twice, which I think is a decent fix. It means the db file
winds up owned by geekotest.geekotest (not gee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209054
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Any update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275391
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178528
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171746
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Any update? Just look for some open review-request and do the informal review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879877
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Flags|needinfo?(kparmar4@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879757
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Flags|needinfo?(zy...@mys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.zaits...@zap.org.au
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #46 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
adamwill's scratch build of openqa-4.3-12.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12956321
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #45 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I think the asset generation script should remove
/usr/share/openqa/public/sass/.sass-cache/ after it's done. That directory has
mode 0700 which is annoying.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307134
Bug ID: 1307134
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-alabaster - Alabaster port for
MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307132
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300674
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307132
Bug ID: 1307132
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-cinder - A clean responsive
theme for the MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307130
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1300674
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307130
Bug ID: 1307130
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-basic-theme - MkDocs Basic
Theme
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307129
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1307130
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307130
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1307129
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1307129
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307129
Bug ID: 1307129
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-bootstrap - Bootstrap theme for
MKDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307129
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1307127
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
Bug ID: 1307127
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-bootswatch - Bootswatch themes
for MkDocs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: med
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #44 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to awill...@redhat.com from comment #36)
> Another fix, I guess, would be to have /var/lib/openqa/db owned by
> geekotest.geekotest , which would happen to work OK with the code as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #43 from John Dulaney ---
Just out of curiosity, what happens if you leave the db directory owned by
geekotest.root and then set facls to allow the geekotest user write access?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304580
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-kind-of-3.0.2-3.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12955820
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304580
--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith ---
I blindly copied the devDependencies over from package.json, assuming they were
all needed as BuildRequires. Seems that most of them weren't needed.
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306548
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jare
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306548
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306548
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #42 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
adamwill's scratch build of openqa-4.3-12.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12955213
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297411
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #41 from awill...@redhat.com ---
Well, here's some crap that might be better, I guess?
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/openqa/openqa.spec
https://www.happyassassin.net/reviews/openqa/openqa-4.3-11.fc23.src.rpm
https://www.ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #40 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
adamwill's scratch build of openqa-4.3-11.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12954670
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #39 from awill...@redhat.com ---
Note while I work on this stuff: the trigger approach has one drawback, which
is that it requires a regular dependency on rubygem(sass) - as the generation
is now done on the target system and not i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297704
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cookies-2.2.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304882
--- Comment #38 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
adamwill's scratch build of openqa-4.3-11.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12953562
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307044
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1306409, 1306613
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306409
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1307044
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306613
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1307044
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307044
Bug ID: 1307044
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test2-Workflow - Interface for
writing workflow tools such as RSPEC
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303451
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pusher-java-client
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23 R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5c7fbfc747
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update Syst
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc22 R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b3d572c4db
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305334
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23 R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5c7fbfc747
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305333
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
R-highlight-0.4.7-1.fc23 R-inline-0.3.14-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5c7fbfc747
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
libbson-1.3.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-522cb996e2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
libbson-1.3.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2b04670a06
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306923
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306613
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
--- Comment #32 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/libbson
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306299
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Time-Moment
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
--- Comment #31 from Petr Pisar ---
Many thanks to everyone involved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303451
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157402
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|liblxqt |
--- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298715
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
xlogin-0-0.1.20160114git97667d7.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295478
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
python-astroquery-0.3.1-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295249
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
python-gatspy-0.2.1-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306613
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test2-Suite
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306923
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-DBIx-XHTML_Table
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
