https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135
Alberto Ruiz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133
Alberto Ruiz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Bug ID: 1307228
Summary: Review Request: dynafed- The Dynamic Federations
system allows to expose via HTTP and WebDAV a very
fast dynamic name space
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #1 from Andrea ---
better Spec URL:
http://svn.cern.ch/guest/lcgdm/ugr/tags/dynafed_1_1_0/packaging/rpm/specs/dynafed.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter ---
Yes, no need for nitpicking... let's try to prioritize fixing review blockers
first. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307238
Bug ID: 1307238
Summary: Review Request: gdouros-avdira-fonts - A font based on
elements created by Demetrios Damilas (late 15th c.)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
The library under %{_libdir}/libunity was put there only because it is private,
so it should never get linked (and need the .so symlink). That said, it's
presence is mostly harmless
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307238
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307243
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307243
Bug ID: 1307243
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-load-json-file - Read and parse
a JSON file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307245
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307245
Bug ID: 1307245
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-path-type - Check if a path is
a file, directory, or symlink
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307247
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307247
Bug ID: 1307247
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-pseudomap - A thing that is a
lot like ES6 `Map`, but without iterators
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307243
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307245
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307245
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307247
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281801
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
pbrobinson's scratch build of tinycompress-1.1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm for f24
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12968201
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306407
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ansible1.9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281801
--- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson ---
src: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/tinycompress-1.1.0-2.fc23.src.rpm
spec: as above
The commented out file is removed. I don't intend to push it to F-22 so
hardened is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304571
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-arr-diff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281801
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281801
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208738
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306407
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304580
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-kind-of
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307245
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-path-type
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307247
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-pseudomap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #28 from Stuart D Gathman ---
I see that there is a compat-libuv010, which will probably work with cjdns.
That will get rid of the last embedded library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307257
Bug ID: 1307257
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-strip-bom - Strip UTF-8 byte
order mark (BOM) from a string/buffer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307257
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305893
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1307257
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307243
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1307257
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305893
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307257
Bug 1307257 depends on bug 1305893, which changed state.
Bug 1305893 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-utf8 - Detect if a buffer is
utf8 encoded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305893
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305655
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
> I'm don't think boost license applies to the binary rpm
You are right, the Boost license does not apply to the binary package. It is
used only for headers that are not installed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307271
Bug ID: 1307271
Summary: Review Request: vswm - Very Simple Wireless Manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133950
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013374
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307216
Bug ID: 1307216
Summary: Review Request: php-sebastian-code-unit-reverse-lookup
- Looks up which function or method a line of code
belongs to
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307216
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307459
Bug ID: 1307459
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD - Fake HTTP
server module for testing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305737
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer ---
Unfortunately fedorapeople.org's cgit is not operational. Here are alternative
links:
Spec URL: https://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/reprepro.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264337
Marcus Karlsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264337
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Marcus Karlsson from comment #3)
> Package Review
> Issues:
> ===
> - License check detected this one file licensed under AFL-3.0.
> Perhaps add it to the license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #12 from Jonny Heggheim ---
> Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s
> adding license headers
https://github.com/timmolter/XChange/issues/1185
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #13 from Jonny Heggheim ---
> can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063 ?
Yes, I will spend my next available "Fedora package time session" looking at
it.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305655
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303764
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #13)
> > can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063 ?
>
> Yes, I will spend my next available "Fedora package time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189015
--- Comment #19 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260254
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #4)
> For your information:
> - pecl/mongodb 1.0.x is compatible with version 1.2.x
> - pecl/mongodb 1.1.x is compatible with version 1.3.x
>
> So
56 matches
Mail list logo