https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286885
Jiri Konecny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
--- Comment #2 from ocrdma-dev@broadcom.com ---
Attaching the path to the source RPM file and Spec file available in
openfabrics.org server.
Src RPM file:
http://downloads.openfabrics.org/downloads/libocrdma/SRPMS/1.0.6/libocrdma-1.0.6-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313683
Bug ID: 1313683
Summary: Review Request: php-zendframework-zend-psr7bridge -
Zend Framework Psr7Bridge component
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313683
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||zendframework/zend-psr7brid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154
--- Comment #5 from Boris Ranto ---
Ken, there are just two minor things:
- we should use %global instead of %define in the .spec file (you use %define
srcname notario)
- rpmlint (spell check) complains that Schemas should be Schemes
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner ---
There was some activity in the mono master branch for dotnet 4.5.
commit/2889dda3dcf7ab9e70d02ca7c746f156e39934a2
Should we step from nterry fork to the original mono GitHub?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge ---
please fix the bug description, it's a review request, not "Update."
We're sponsoring people into the packager group, not projects or packages.
An example of a review request, what it takes etc. is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274742
--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith ---
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-string-width/nodejs-string-width.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-string-width/nodejs-string-width-1.0.1-2.fc25.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274742
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1159091 (openra)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1313828
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Bug ID: 1313828
Summary: Review Request: open-nat - Library to allow port
forwarding in NAT devices that support UPNP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||open-nat
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
raphgro's scratch build of open-nat-2.0.11-1.20160128gita5c834d.fc23.src.rpm
for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13200073
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270525
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Matthias Mailänder from comment #1)
> Attention: for OpenRA you will need to package MaxMind.Db version 1.1.0
What's the relevant difference? Are there any concerns about ABI/API?
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Matthias Mailänder from comment #4)
> An update to 2.5.0 is also not likely to succeed.
> https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/10280
Is this still relevant? I see the linked PR is closed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270034
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-bugsnag-panicwrap-1.1.0-0.1.gitaceac81.fc23 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c083a9f6ec
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309795
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308354
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286885
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy Newton ---
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-2.fc23.src.rpm
* Wed Mar 02 2016 Tomas Repik - 2.1.8-2
- launcher HistogramLogProces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290523
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dwa...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Matthias Mailänder from comment #1)
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/games:openra/sharpfont might help
> you.
We hit an issue with 4.5.2:
https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues/15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290513
--- Comment #31 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/playonlinux
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274742
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-string-width
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286885
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/orthorobot
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
raphgro's scratch build of sharpfont-3.0.1-1.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13201149
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/sharpfont.spec
SRPM: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/sharpfont-3.0.1-1.src.rpm
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312408
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
SRPM url gives 404.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290523
Daniel Walsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dwa...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290523
--- Comment #7 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Change commit in the spec to b1cd5c2ca3f3aebe6848f798bcbfaad8b5682752 so it
picks 1.4.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
--- Comment #9 from jiri vanek ---
Hello!
You tried to install this package+launcher and it worked?
I did not, but:
cp HistogramLogProcessor %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/HistogramLogProcessor
Can never work.
Even ig, it is against all guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286885
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #48 from Stuart D Gathman ---
bencode.js (used by cjdns-tools) has this license:
/* Copyright (c) 2009 Anton Ekblad
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
copy
of this software and as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313942
Bug ID: 1313942
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-docker-go - Go packages
with small patches autogenerated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310886
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1313942
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313942
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1310886
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5)
> Still fails in mock, same error as above. I'm using fedora-rawhide-i386 mock.
Okay, I can reproduce that too with fedora-rawhide mock.
Can you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310674
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jpopelka's scratch build of rubygem-github-linguist-4.7.6-2.fc23.src.rpm for
f23-candidate completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13202610
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290513
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
playonlinux-4.2.10-5.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1430c7fcdb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yeah, it builds fine in fedora-23-i386 mock.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ktdreyer's scratch build of python-notario-0.0.11-2.fc25.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13203753
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Ken Dreyer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #49 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Also, licensecheck needs work. Most of the files it reports as UNKNOWN,
actually have a GPLv3 license - right at the start. I'm not sure why it
doesn't recognize it.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305669
--- Comment #3 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the review.
New URLs for the files.
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/rubygem-benchmark-ips/rubygem-benchmark-ips-2.5.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Mailänder ---
It is currently help Fedora or keep Windows XP support by not doing the
surrounding .NET 4.5 target upgrade. We have not resolved this yet. Sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270525
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Mailänder ---
Yes, it is required for the old .NET 4.0 non-async library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Mailänder ---
After a long hiatus we decided to do that not yet, because it is not possible
to get Mono or .NET >= 4.5 to run on Windows XP which parts of the community
still use. https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305658
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-em-spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Matthias Mailänder from comment #6)
> It is currently help Fedora or keep Windows XP support by not doing the
> surrounding .NET 4.5 target upgrade. We have not resolved this yet. Sorry.
a.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
Matthias Mailänder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matth...@mailaender.name
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056
Bug 1269056 depends on bug 1208101, which changed state.
Bug 1208101 Summary: Review Request: libbson - Building, parsing, and iterating
BSON documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260254
Bug 1260254 depends on bug 1208101, which changed state.
Bug 1208101 Summary: Review Request: libbson - Building, parsing, and iterating
BSON documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
libbson-1.3.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Mailänder ---
https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/issues/10661 has the details.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311473
Christos Triantafyllidis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes ---
The test failures are the result of an apparent behavior change between
etcd-2.2.1 in F23 and etcd-2.2.5 in Rawhide.
Running the tests from source (pythonX setup.py test) pass for both python2 and
python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290523
Nalin Dahyabhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||na...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255370
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-opencontainers-specs-0.2.0-0.1.git25cbfc4.el6 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-ac04a97e7c
--- Comment #26 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255370
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #26 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255370
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-opencontainers-specs-0.2.0-0.1.git25cbfc4.el6 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-ac04a97e7c
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
Thanks for the review, new items listed:
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/rubygem-async_sinatra/rubygem-async_sinatra-1.2.1-2.fc24.src.rpm
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/rubygem-asy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290523
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Walsh ---
Fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306971
Bug 1306971 depends on bug 1306968, which changed state.
Bug 1306968 Summary: Review Request: php-mock - PHP-Mock can mock built-in PHP
functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306968
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277484
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277493
Bug 1277493 depends on bug 1277484, which changed state.
Bug 1277484 Summary: Review Request: php-nette - Nette Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277484
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277484
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
php-nette-2.3.9-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306968
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
php-mock-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972
Bug 1306972 depends on bug 1306968, which changed state.
Bug 1306968 Summary: Review Request: php-mock - PHP-Mock can mock built-in PHP
functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306968
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290523
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Walsh ---
Also updated commit message.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277484
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
php-nette-2.3.9-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302144
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
marcusk's scratch build of openshift-restclient-java-3.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm for
rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13205948
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297514
Denis Fateyev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302144
--- Comment #10 from Marcus Karlsson ---
Thanks for the review, and sorry for the delay on my end. I have updated the
spec file as follows:
I have received a license clarification from upstream developer André
Dietisheim who confirmed that th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297514
--- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304125
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312408
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
Oops, mock is producing fc25 instead of fc24 now. Try this instead:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-testing/python-sphinx-testing-0.7.1-2.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312406
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Would it be possible to build both versions from the same build directory?
As I mentioned in the other bug, I would really rather not, even if it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312407
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> "Pybtex is Unicode-aware." — thank you. I'd love not to have to fight with
> bibtex anymore.
:-)
> The same as with the other package: I don't th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312409
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> A general comment for this package and the other ones: there's nothing wrong
> with %{with_py3k}, but so far people have been using %{with_python3}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312410
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Thank you so much for picking up all of these reviews. I really appreciate it.
Since you haven't started on this one yet, I have sneakily made the same
changes you requested in the other python packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302144
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #23 from Oden Eriksson ---
FYI: https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MXS-597
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #24 from Oden Eriksson ---
That -fPIC problem is fixed with:
https://github.com/mariadb-corporation/MaxScale/commit/c8253cc7676aca3a748309b33bb877bb291b11aa
The package builds fine in rawhide now, but I prefer to wait until they
93 matches
Mail list logo
