https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299127
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
IMHO the ExcludeArch entry violates guidelines and must be adjusted every times
the pascal compiler gets ported to a new architecture and means a (small) mass
rebuild.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309907
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
yamllint-1.0.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309907
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314995
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
pidgin-indicator-0.9-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-51a4de5f33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314995
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
pidgin-indicator-0.9-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0827c8907d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
BR:git-core is less costly than BR:git. But in fact I don't think you need the
BR and -Sgit at all, things usually work with plain patch.
The %description is a better summary than the Summa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Parse-Gitignore-0.02-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System ---
procenv-0.44-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CBOR-XS-1.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.24-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315134
--- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow ---
Here are the lint outputs. The unstripped-binary-or-object and no-soname errors
are typical for Erlang libraries and can be ignored.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: erlang-ezlib-1.0.1-3.fc24.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #10 from Matthew Barnes ---
Updated the spec and srpm again, and added a patch to work around the test
failure. The patch is kind of lame but works for now.
https://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/python-etcd/python-etcd-0.4.3-auth-test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315021
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System ---
procenv-0.44-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315134
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
rbarlow's scratch build of erlang-ezlib-1.0.1-3.fc25.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13253788
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315134
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1312517
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315134
Bug ID: 1315134
Summary: Review Request: erlang-ezlib - Native zlib driver for
Erlang
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311473
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-novaclient-os-networks-0.25-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301268
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272465
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270045
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311473
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
Jeremy Eder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||je...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System ---
procenv-0.44-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CBOR-XS-1.4-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #19 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13252343
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(or...@cora.nwra.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Created attachment 1133565
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1133565&action=edit
build.log
Thanks Raphael for the excellent work!
---> review.txt as done by raphael looks fine by me.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please provide a comment explaining what files are under what license in the
binary RPMS (since you have two licenses)
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Well, as I figured out MPI support is not implemented in fact
(https://github.com/vrpn/vrpn/blob/version_07.33/vrpn_Connection.C#L5387), and
the only thing that changed after %_openmpi_load was the cmake
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300981
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298238
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Julien
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298238
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juj...@jujens.eu
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299127
--- Comment #5 from Christian Dersch ---
Review done, there are some things to fix (see below). Btw: I'll add this
package to Astronomy Spin once it is approved. Looks like a nice feature, thank
you for taking this up :)
Package Review
=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
For a review swap, could you take mdp (bug #1246790) or dreamchess-tools (bug
#1305390)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
> Sorry, I don't understand the meaning of "UAT"
http://www.techopedia.com/definition/3887/user-acceptance-testing-uat
http://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/what-is-user-acceptance-testing-uat
etc.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdepim4/kdepim4.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdepim4/kdepim4-4.14.10-20.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299127
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 25 files h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250940
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312015
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311959
--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner ---
d. Why not provide documentation (from doc subfolder) in the package?
dd. Please also add %doc *.md
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311959
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250872
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264712
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(bioinfornatics@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315099
Bug ID: 1315099
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-olekukonko-tablewriter -
ASCII table in golang
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250801
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner ---
Created attachment 1133533
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1133533&action=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
Created attachment 1133532
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1133532&action=edit
review.txt
LGTM, please approve
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270045
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-dvsekhvalnov-jose2go-1.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9ed6d93833
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250679
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7)
> Created attachment 1133481 [details]
> appdata file
>
> $ appstream-util validate-relax xfpanel-switch.appdata.xml
> xfpanel-switch.appdata.xml: OK
(In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250570
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272465
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-prometheus-common-0-0.4.git4fdc91a.fc23 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e35a568a20
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250453
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250422
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250407
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for
epel7-candidate failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250375
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
besser82's scratch build of cmake3-3.5.0-0.2.rc3.fc25.src.rpm for el6-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13250371
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
--- Comment #17 from al...@mellanox.com ---
>[We're getting close to completion of this review, so I'm reassigning this
>to Neil Horman who has package sponsor powers and tentatively agreed
>to sponsor you. I remain on the CC list.]
Thanks Mich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #12)
> can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381 for me?
Thanks for the review. Taken.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381 for me?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1133486
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1133486&action=edit
Italian translation
attached it.po file, add to the source directory (xfpanel-switch-1.0.3/po) if
desired
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/xfpanel-switch/xfpanel-switch.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/xfpanel-switch/xfpanel-switch-1.0.3-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Created attachment 1133481
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1133481&action=edit
appdata file
$ appstream-util validate-relax xfpanel-switch.appdata.xml
xfpanel-switch.appdata.xml: O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
As for this -
> Maybe you could remove:
> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/licenses/%{name}
> cp -p COPYING %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/licenses/%{name}/
> and use (for EPEL only, see https://fedorahosted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> Issues:
> ===
> - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
Done.
> - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or deskto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #4)
> When you update your package, you need bump the release number of the
> package and add a comment to this ticket with the Spec URL and SRPM URL
> speci
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Here it is now!
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/nmrglue/python-nmrglue.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/nmrglue/python-nmrglue-0.5-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
mattia's scratch build of astrometry-0.67-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13249652
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #14 from Mattia Verga ---
Spec URL: http://www.coolbits.it/fedora/astrometry.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.coolbits.it/fedora/astrometry-0.67-1.fc23.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sun Mar 03 2016 Mattia Verga - 0.67-1
- Update to 0.67
- Use pk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1315057
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020
Jonathan Underwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jonathan.underw...@gmail.co
84 matches
Mail list logo
