https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318310
Marcos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318359
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
--- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
> (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> > > Package Review
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182
--- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow ---
Thank you Peter, it's fixed in release 2:
Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-fast_xml.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-fast_xml-1.1.11-2.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
Dominika Krejčí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dkre...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281313
--- Comment #2 from Filip Szymański ---
Spec URL: https://fszymanski.fedorapeople.org/podget/podget.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fszymanski.fedorapeople.org/podget/podget-0.7.10-1.fc23.src.rpm
Update to 0.7.10
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315816
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306629
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Blocking issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
ocrdma-dev@broadcom.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ocrdma-dev.pdl@br |
|oadcom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318988
--- Comment #1 from jiri vanek ---
Hello!
This package may be ... a bit exceptional. Especially - its going to be killed
and merged in aprox. an year, and merged with main java-1.8.0-openjdk package.
From that is derivated is shape - I'm i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317131
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-coverage_pth-0.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I also made a scratch build in koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13377711. It failed on amd64
arch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #25 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
-Werror strikes again:
Testing swap qsort_r...
((gcc -Werror -o os-features-test-swap-qsort \
-g -Wall -ffinite-math-only -fno-signaling-nans -pthread -O2 -g -pipe
-Wall -Werror=format-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318781
--- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13377831
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
fasd-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295126
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318328
--- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean ---
Thanks mulhern!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
--- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278081
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter ---
Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdepim4/kdepim4.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdepim4/kdepim4-4.14.10-22.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sat Mar 19 2016 Rex Dieter - 4.14.10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363
--- Comment #3 from Sopot Cela ---
Spec
URL:https://sopotc.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-epp-logging/eclipse-epp-logging.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sopotc.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-epp-logging/eclipse-epp-logging-1.100.0-0.2.gitc6ce9f2.fc23.src.rpm
I f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318359
--- Comment #7 from mulhern ---
Thanks!
Regarding %check, I'm happier skipping it because:
1. I'm the upstream maintainer and I have good continuous integration. So, I
know the package is well-tested upstream.
2. My tests use the hypothesis t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318359
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean ---
Hi mulhern, I found a few issues:
- (must fix) Sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
Ther
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord.spec
SRPM URL:
http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord-3.0.0-2.20160317gitb17d063.src.rpm
koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312963
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Underwood ---
Created attachment 1137141
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1137141&action=edit
Build log of failed build on rawhide
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318368
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306629
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358
Bug ID: 1318358
Summary: Review Request: copr-dist-git - Copr services for Dist
Git server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301116
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 from Dan H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316982
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|cstra...@redhat.com |dkre...@redhat.com
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317592
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #8)
Nice.
Once the build is done, don't forget to close the issue with "Rawhide"
resolution and fill in the "Fixed in version" field.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317131
--- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
License should be included. Built and tested, works fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/copr/copr-dist-git.spec
SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/copr/copr-dist-git-0.15-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914790
Bug 914790 depends on bug 914788, which changed state.
Bug 914788 Summary: Review Request: mingw-libtool - The GNU Portable Library
Tool for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914788
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914788
Marc-Andre Lureau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317592
--- Comment #8 from Jun Aruga ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #6)
> Thx. Now just go ahead, import the SRPM into dist-git and build it in Koji.
Yes, I imported the SRPM by "fedpkg import PAT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
python-etcd-0.4.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Sopot Cela from comment #3)
> Spec
> URL:https://sopotc.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-epp-logging/eclipse-epp-logging.
> spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://sopotc.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-epp-logging/eclips
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318359
--- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean ---
Created attachment 1137144
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1137144&action=edit
Diff between source tarballs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from jiri vanek
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
--- Comment #19 from Antti Järvinen ---
Ok, great.
There is a new upstream release coming in a few weeks, release testing is
ongoing. My suggestion is that as new version is packaged, the problems listed
by Zbigniew are fixed in the process.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: librosa - a |Review Request:
|pytho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308779
--- Comment #14 from Greg Bailey ---
(In reply to Anoop C S from comment #13)
> (In reply to Greg Bailey from comment #12)
> > I checked out licensecheck against the git-tools README.md file on an Ubuntu
> > machine, and the version there flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299139
--- Comment #27 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yes, you can. There's probably a bug in the build system, but not every bug has
to be fixed (especially when it's in the build system, so it doesn't affect
users).
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939
--- Comment #6 from Benji Wiebe ---
Corrected permissions on unit file.
Using install -D now.
Using cp -a now.
Switched to %make_build faup1090.
I reworded the first few words of the Description.
Was: dump1090 is software that can utilize
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794793
--- Comment #8 from IBM Bug Proxy ---
--- Comment From hannsj_...@de.ibm.com 2016-03-17 08:39 EDT---
*** Bug 139187 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914788
--- Comment #5 from František Dvořák ---
This review is probably stalled and can be closed within week according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954148
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák ---
This review looks like stalled and can be closed within week according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970427
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Bloc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317306
--- Comment #3 from Omar Berroteran ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #1)
> - You can drop Requires: python3-libs since it is installed by default in
> every Fedora install.
>
> - Use %{name} in the URL tag. It becomes:
> https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307129
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
mkdocs-bootstrap-0.1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318059
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Nuxoll ---
Updated spec file:
https://snuxoll.fedorapeople.org/packages/morituri.spec
New koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13368364
> - set configure to be more verbose
I a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande ---
Is Python2 not supported ?
Documentation ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794793
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID|IBM Linux Technology Center |IBM Linux Technology Center
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305658
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305658
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-em-spec-0.2.7-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
tng-1.7.8-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d5397411e9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jva...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318328
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-detox-0.10.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308367
--- Comment #10 from John M. Harris, Jr. ---
Updated spec file, patched CMake files from upstream for SO versioning.
Spec URL: https://git.openblox.org/raknet.git/plain/libraknet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/JohnMHarrisJr/RakNet/releases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318988
--- Comment #3 from jiri vanek ---
Thank you, I was just about to fix it. Sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317131
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-coverage_pth.spec
SRPM URL:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-coverage_pth-0.0.1-2.fc23.src.rpm
Included the license from upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318328
mulhern changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/libvma
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319055
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
xfpanel-switch-1.0.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(al...@mellanox.co |needinfo?(ophirmu@mellanox.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318251
--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman ---
(In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1)
> Source file is ok
> Summary is ok
> License is ok
> URL and Source0 are ok
> All tests passed
>
> $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Test-Time-0.04-1.fc25.noarch.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317621
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-triq-0-0.1.gitc7306b8.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ca6bf34411
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318381
Bug ID: 1318381
Summary: Review Request: GTEngine - Geometric Tools Engine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #20 from Ralf Senderek ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #19)
> Before you post a new spec and SRPM go ahead and remove the chkconfig stuff.
> No need to add it just to silence rpmlint. We have to review all rpmlint
> erro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939
--- Comment #4 from Benji Wiebe ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> But %description should be a bit longer: what can you do with this package,
> what is the output, is special hardware required, etc. Doesn't have t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
You also require some packages as BuildRequires, but you don't use them when
not creating the docs and running the tests:
BuildRequires: python3-numpydoc
BuildRequires: python3-seaborn
BuildRequires: py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318059
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
- morituri ships files under GPLv3+ (morituri/common/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317345
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/erlang-luerl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
gmavenplus-plugin-1.5-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317131
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-coverage_pth
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300981
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-django-rest-framework-braces-0.1.6-2.fc24 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5739f5b60e
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312350
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rjsmin-1.0.12-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281313
--- Comment #4 from Filip Szymański ---
Spec URL: https://fszymanski.fedorapeople.org/podget/podget.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fszymanski.fedorapeople.org/podget/podget-0.7.12-1.fc23.src.rpm
Update to 0.7.12
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318328
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317621
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-triq-0-0.1.gitc7306b8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316772
--- Comment #5 from Randy Barlow ---
Hello Peter! I have added the debuginfo package:
Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-stringprep.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-stringprep-1.0.3-3.fc25.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317178
--- Comment #3 from Benji Wiebe ---
OK, I fixed those issues you mentioned. As for the Summary, I'm not sure if the
new wording is better or not. From what I understand, Tcl programs are not
compiled, and not a single file. So the files are co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317131
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317306
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
Please use the format:
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317131
--- Comment #5 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Posting also the output of fedora-review
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
