https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Both python-devel and python3-devel pull in python-macros which provides this
macro. So something else must be going on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316912
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sabre-xml-1.4.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305390
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
dreamchess-tools-0-0.2.20141101gitf8f32aa.fc23, tristripper-1.10-2.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316912
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
php-sabre-xml-1.4.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314995
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
pidgin-indicator-0.9-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298238
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-babelfish-0.5.5-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-20110221-15.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-15ce041700
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-20110221-15.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0ee03feec9
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
…
> Are you able to run the demos?
Please also notice in %prep
# FIXME sloppy tests with a bug in awt
rm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/disruptor-thrift-server
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320546
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-justbytes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
…
> Are you able to run the demos?
Running samples.addressbook.model.AddressBookTest
Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298238
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-babelfish-0.5.5-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311752
--- Comment #14 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
>- %python_provide macro should be used
Well, it works fine for local mock builds and for copr builds, but koji fails
to build SRPM because python-devel is not installed in initial
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #14 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #13)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #12)
> > And is there osme way how to verify that the package works?
> >
> > They had demos inside,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
I'm not a fan of the "super macros" you've suggested, with the exception of
%license. I'd rather know exactly what's going on there and be able to tweak
it. Also, autosetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320725
Daniel Vrátil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320725
Bug ID: 1320725
Summary: Review Request: phonon-qt5 - Multimedia framework api
(Qt 5 version)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
python-etcd-0.4.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316912
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #12)
> And is there osme way how to verify that the package works?
>
> They had demos inside, but I was unable to run them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319522
Daniel Vrátil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lupi...@mailbox.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306629
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #12 from jiri vanek ---
And is there osme way how to verify that the package works?
They had demos inside, but I was unable to run them.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #14 from Miro Hrončok ---
And of course, if you need help, feel free to ping me on IRC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320546
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok ---
Here comes the formal review. Once you fix the issues, please indicate in your
comment what you
have fixed so I can see if you forget something, or if the fix didn't work as
expected.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #10)
> Dont you consider changing of versioning?
No. It's obviously a pre-release of 2.5 as noted in the sources. For the
alphatag I use the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #10 from jiri vanek ---
Dont you consider changing of versioning?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305650
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
Hi Jiri,
thanks for your review. Is there any blocker for a formal approval, except the
(obvious) typo in license?
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316744
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316744
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
f24-backgrounds-24.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter ---
and I thought I offered sufficient answers to your questions in comment #7 and
comment #8 . If that's not acceptable to you, then that's fine. We can agree
to disagree on that (and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|projects...@smart.ms|
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320583
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320583
Bug ID: 1320583
Summary: Review Request: php-swiftmailer - Free Feature-rich
PHP Mailer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter ---
To put another way, I fail to see how this approach runs afoul of current
guidelines and best-practice. Perhaps can you be more specific?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter ---
Feel free to contact FPC if you want clarification.
It's pretty simple and clear *to me* this (current) approach is the ideal way
to handle it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
I fail to see how this can go in conjunction with our (general) guidelines,
look into the links of comment #6. Maybe we need a FPC ticket here to get fully
clear.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320546
--- Comment #1 from mulhern ---
Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13436496
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318359
mulhern changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter ---
I guess I can expand on the Conflicts topic, since many other kdepim4-library
related subpkgs that knode depends on are no longer provided, I moved that
content into the knode-libs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter ---
knode-libs : for multilib, since it contains multilib'd content (shared
libraries), avoids the main/whole package getting multilib'd. It's common
practice.
Conflicts: helps upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
This is obviously a request for a compatibility package.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#MultiplePackages
Not clear for what the subpackage knode-libs is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
--- Comment #15 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/mariadb-java-client/v2/mariadb-java-client.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #31 from Oden Eriksson ---
Incredible. I just pushed so that you can build it against system pcre2 libs
and now with 1.4.0 they force git download and build of MariaDB Connector-C
[...]
-- Building MariaDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320546
mulhern changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|for computation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320546
Bug ID: 1320546
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
Bug ID: 1320532
Summary: Review Request: php-sebastian-object-enumerator -
Traverses array and object to enumerate all referenced
objects
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308985
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Underwood ---
Thanks for the information, Adam - this is precisely the sort of thing that
should be raised and documented during package review, and is why I objected to
Igor's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #12 from Dominika Krejčí ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Krejdom/librosa-specfile/master/python-librosa.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Repik ---
Here is a link to the tests issue on upstream:
https://github.com/xedin/disruptor_thrift_server/issues/13
Thanks for the review, appreciate it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306629
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/metrics-reporter-config/v1/metrics-reporter-config.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
hexer-0.2.3-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7d69fa003b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213065
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316676
--- Comment #4 from Soumya Koduri ---
(In reply to Nikolai Kondrashov from comment #3)
> Thank you, Soumya!
>
> I'll work on the issues. However, I have a few questions:
>
> * I'd like to have the same .spec file work on
67 matches
Mail list logo