https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451
--- Comment #1 from Honggang LI ---
Update to upstream version 1.2.4.1 .
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13478147
URL:
http://people.redhat.com/honli/.82434973391d40a5f58aadbc0a330bfb/mbassador.spec
SRC:
http://people.redha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #26 from gil cattaneo ---
Requested re-integration: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6377
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #25 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #24 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #23 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #22)
> (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #21)
> > Before I approve the package, I would like to clarify one issue -
> >
> > While the provides and requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #22 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #21)
> Before I approve the package, I would like to clarify one issue -
>
> While the provides and requires look correct, why is this not mentioned in
> the spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
fasd-1.0.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307459
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Fake-HTTPD-0.07-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-3.003-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #15 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks gil for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #21 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Before I approve the package, I would like to clarify one issue -
While the provides and requires look correct, why is this not mentioned in the
spec file?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #20 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #12)
> - Added the doc subpackage
> - Added GPLV2+ on the license field.
Maybe, should be added only for doc sub package ... ?
> - I will send an email to upstrea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
koji scratch build -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13477517
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #12 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
- Added the doc subpackage
- Added GPLV2+ on the license field.
- I will send an email to upstream about adding the license headers on
individual files along with licensecheck.txt file.
Updated SPEC a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189015
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
python-MDAnalysis-0.14.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
tng-1.7.8-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299637
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
pam_wrapper-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
fasd-1.0.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-18c55e72fc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8c3ce917d1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-70cf974005
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3e49eba720
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305390
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
dreamchess-tools-0-0.2.20141101gitf8f32aa.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System ---
cjdns-17.3-10.el7, nacl-20110221-15.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System ---
cjdns-17.3-10.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321461
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|leigh123li...@googlemail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #10)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7)
> > $ appstream-util validate
> > /usr/share/appdata/julietaula-montserrat.metainfo.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1140717
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1140717&action=edit
licensecheck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 6748160 bytes in 368 files.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265265
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
And second, fixed build on x86. No idea why arm FTBFS.
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13476279
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-20151221-4.el6 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-7dc6c6d417
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-20151221-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-7c72af3d2a
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-20151221-4.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ae2c22107d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-20151221-4.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2d8a0763ef
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #10 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #7)
> $ appstream-util validate
> /usr/share/appdata/julietaula-montserrat.metainfo.xml
> /usr/share/appdata/julietaula-montserrat.metainfo.xml: FAILE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-20151221-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d998681c55
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321208
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner ---
Fixed missing BR: desktop-file-utils
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13476181
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473
Bug ID: 1321473
Summary: Review Request: diodon - Clipboard manager for GNOME
and Cinnamon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
Stuart D Gathman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246974
--- Comment #18 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117961
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118019
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(i.gnatenko.brain@ |
|gmail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119075
Bug 1119075 depends on bug 1119446, which changed state.
Bug 1119446 Summary: update to 5.2.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119446
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321461
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich ---
This is a re-review request for a package rename.
Old packackage name is compiz-plugins-unsupported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321461
Bug ID: 1321461
Summary: Review Request: compiz-plugins-experimental -
Additional plugins for Compiz
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317178
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212909
Lenka Spackova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|Enhancement |Technology Preview
--- Doc Text *upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: SuperLU43 -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Here is the koji scratch build -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13475506
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #19 from Muku
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Changelog from the updated spec file
* Sun Mar 27 2016 Mukundan Ragavan - 4.3-2
114 - Renamed the package to SuperLU43
115 - Renamed devel shared lib to libsuperlu43
116 - Removed conflicts since the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Spec and SRPM updated.
SPEC URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/compat-superlu-43/SuperLU43.spec
SRPM URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/compat-superlu-43/SuperLU43-4.3-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300943
Jan Včelák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300942
Jan Včelák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300944
Jan Včelák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321455
Bug ID: 1321455
Summary: Review Request: knot-resolver - Caching full DNS
Resolver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> > The name looks weird to me. Why is it needed to use compat in the package
> > name?
>
> Simply use %{pkgn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nonamed...@gmail.com
Assig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> The name looks weird to me. Why is it needed to use compat in the package
> name?
Simply use %{pkgname}43 as the package name (without any dash). The digits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321440
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301286
--- Comment #3 from Dhiru Kholia ---
https://fedorapeople.org/~halfie/packages/firejail/firejail.spec
This .spec files packages Firejail 0.9.38, and it also simplifies inclusion of
various profiles.
I am actually unable to run Firejail on Fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321449
Bug ID: 1321449
Summary: Review Request: python-sshtunnel - SSH tunnels to
remote server
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
73 matches
Mail list logo