https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451
--- Comment #5 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #2)
> Issues
> ==
> The LICENSE file should be in the package and marked as %license.
Packaged it up.
> Must own the directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #69 from Fedora Update System ---
cjdns-17.3-11.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ce63703998
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324268
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451
--- Comment #4 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #3)
> Some solution (or workaround? I cannot tell) was suggested:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086#c65
It does not work for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324270
Bug ID: 1324270
Summary: Review Request: python-spur - Run commands locally or
over SSH using the same interface
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324267
--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel ---
Just fixed my DNS settings; should be set once it gets updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324268
Bug ID: 1324268
Summary: Review Request: python3-paramiko - SSH2 protocol
library for Python 3
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324267
Ben Boeckel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1323496
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324267
Bug ID: 1324267
Summary: Review Request: python-keyutils - Python3 bindings for
the keyutils package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322168
--- Comment #11 from Honggang LI ---
ibacm-1.2.0-3.fc23/24/25 had been built.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=751457
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=751456
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316762
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316762
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307134
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Spec URL: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/mkdocs-alabaster.spec
SRPM URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/mkdocs-alabaster-0.7.1-1.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307134
--- Comment #2 from William Moreno ---
Spec URL: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/mkdocs-alabaster.spec
SRPM URL:
https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/mkdocs-alabaster-0.7.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324204
--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Faměra ---
Currently I'm working toward next release (0.5) and below is snapshot from the
most recent commit c287b1e1a23c0a9e3f874c04f1d0954b56cf367d.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324235
Bug ID: 1324235
Summary: Review Request: python-cytoolz - Cython implementation
of the toolz package
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324233
Bug ID: 1324233
Summary: Review Request: python-toolz - A functional standard
library for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319519
--- Comment #3 from Marc Deop ---
Reviewing the src.rpm everything looks good to me (the spec link is still
outdated)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
--- Comment #3 from Marc Deop ---
The spec file is still the 5.6.0 one, the src.rpm is updated though.
Reviewing the spec file from
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/grub2-breeze-theme-5.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319519
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Vrátil ---
Thanks for review!
Spec URL:
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/plymouth-theme-breeze.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Vrátil ---
Thanks for review!
Spec URL:
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/grub2-breeze-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
--- Comment #1 from Marc Deop ---
- License file (COPYING) in sources says that license should be GPLv3
- Is there any special reason why "%global _grubthemedir" is declared in the
%build section?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086445
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324221
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324221
Bug ID: 1324221
Summary: Review Request: dbusmenu-qt5 - A Qt5 implementation of
the DBusMenu protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324212
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Engelbrecht ---
Here is the repository in question: https://github.com/garglk/garglk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
--- Comment #26 from Gergely Polonkai ---
Turns out I have no personal space on FedoraPeople.org…
You can fetch the SRPM and the slightly modified .spec here:
http://snoopy.polonkai.eu/priv/valadoc-rpm/
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324212
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Engelbrecht ---
I'm new to packaging software, but am happy to take on the task of packaging it
to Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682544
Andrew Engelbrecht changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(extras-qa@fedorap |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324212
Bug ID: 1324212
Summary: Can gargoyle now be included in Fedora?
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
--- Comment #11 from John Dulaney ---
Spec URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/micropython.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/micropython-1.6-3.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
--- Comment #10 from John Dulaney ---
Okay, went ahead and removed that entire directory just to be sure (rather than
pick and choose the non-freely licensed files)
Did a scratchbuild that may be found here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682544
--- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Yes, the bundling restrictions have been lifted. I have no idea whether the
package actually meets the packaging guidelines, though; it would need a proper
package review.
If someone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324204
Bug ID: 1324204
Summary: Review Request: fast-vm - script for defining VMs from
images provided in thin LVM pool.
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
borgbackup-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bd1515f44d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
borgbackup-1.0.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4ffaff98a7
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682544
Andrew Engelbrecht changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317622
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317624
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282063
Francesco Frassinelli (frafra) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(frap...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
--- Comment #8 from John Dulaney ---
Spec URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/micropython.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpms.jdulaney.com/review/micropython-1.6-2.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
--- Comment #7 from John Dulaney ---
I asked upstream about the binary:
https://github.com/micropython/micropython/issues/1968
I received the following response:
> Hi,
>
> It's part of the CC3200 SDK supplied
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
--- Comment #3 from Rich Megginson ---
looks good
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306571
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-multistatic-1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308779
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
git-tools-0-0.2.20160313gitd6d55b3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
--- Comment #25 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Gergely Polonkai from comment #23)
> My Fedora account’s SSH key is at home, so I can hopefully upload the .spec
> and SRPM to fedorapeople later today (at or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please upload the spec file and srpm somewhere (see comment #18).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307132
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307149
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13566708
naming: ok
sources: ok (mostly)
4d0a704ab73d2c4dafc313ec313362ea 0.1.1.tar.gz
1. SHOULD follow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307149
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307132
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323871
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Marc Deop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@marcdeop.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1300674
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310128
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
disruptor-thrift-server-0.3.8-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307129
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
mkdocs-bootstrap-0.1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223887
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223887
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
atomicapp-0.4.5-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5d93f1948c
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304632
--- Comment #13 from Doug Ledford ---
The Provides:, while appearing odd, is so that if a person does:
yum install libibverbs-utils
then yum (now dnf) will install the libraries for libibverbs (which don't
provide any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
--- Comment #43 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #42)
> I've reuploaded with %check disabled. I didn't bump the release for this
> change so the current links are good.
Failed on rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310128
--- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar ---
I changed the comment and renamed the extracted license file. You should have
become archeologist.
Updated package is on the same addresses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: cassandrsa |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324063
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
copr-dist-git-0.15-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-49331c598d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
copr-dist-git-0.15-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-371842c47d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
copr-dist-git-0.15-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c3816edcbf
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323468
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323468
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
python-furl-0.4.93-1.fc24 python-orderedmultidict-0.7.6-1.fc24 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
> The MicroPython-for-Unix build doesn't *use* any of those pieces, but I'm not
> sure of the potential implications of having them in the SRPM. Should this BZ
> be set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510
--- Comment #88 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr ---
Hello Community,
Last upgrade from last upstream release (added support for gnome 3.20).
New SPEC, SRPMS files and noarch RPMS packages for testing are provided (F-22,
F-23,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239267
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DEFERRED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260845
--- Comment #15 from William Moreno ---
I am sorry but my builds are still falingin:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/build/173473/
The epel7 build pass but f24 and f25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239267
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|j.orti.alca...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451
--- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #1)
> And failed to build v1.2.4.2 with gradle, please see [2].
> [2] https://github.com/bennidi/mbassador/issues/137
I am not familiar with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292413
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-es6-iterator-2.0.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283327
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451
--- Comment #2 from Michal Schmidt ---
Package Review
==
Issues
==
The LICENSE file should be in the package and marked as %license.
Must own the directory /usr/share/maven-poms/mbassador
Suggestions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
disruptor-thrift-server-0.3.8-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
Bug 1324020 depends on bug 1306575, which changed state.
Bug 1306575 Summary: Review Request: disruptor-thrift-server - Thrift Server
implementation backed by LMAX Disruptor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306575
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
One more comment: Summary could be better (after all, nobody cares if it's
"free", they already know that since they're getting the package from Fedora).
Maybe, something
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307129
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
mkdocs-bootstrap-0.1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo