https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
Bug ID: 1325763
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Requires-Git - Check your
test requirements against the available version of Git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325023
--- Comment #13 from Gerd Hoffmann ---
Update uploaded to https://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/review/edk2/
Changes:
- updated tarball.
- added all C tools to -tools package, not only EfiRom and VolInfo.
- changed versioning scheme to match cur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325023
--- Comment #12 from Gerd Hoffmann ---
> Also, can you provide some comments on all the patches that are in there?
> Are they waiting on review, or stuff that will never be upstream, or
> something else?
Most of them attempted to get upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325023
--- Comment #11 from Gerd Hoffmann ---
> + make -C BaseTools
> Stop using make, use the m alias! Sleeping 1...
What's this?
Also the log looks like a parallel build basetools is attempted.
That doesn't work.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324233
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
Thanks for the review. I'll use the global for the description.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert.am...@intel.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324235
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergio.pa...@gmail.com
Assig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324212
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221204
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323181
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324233
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
def run(cmd):
click.echo(' $ ' + cmd)
return os.system(cmd)
def clone(name):
url = repo_url(name, ssh=True, git=True)
run('git clone %s %s' % (url, name.split('/')[-1]))
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Created attachment 1145788
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1145788&action=edit
licensecheck output
Comment about licensecheck -
[x]: License field in the package spec file matche
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Created attachment 1145787
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1145787&action=edit
rpmlint on installed packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
My complaints -
1/
[?]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 706560 bytes in 2 files.
---> Might I s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902024
--- Comment #21 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Any update about the package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317345
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
--- Comment #23 from Antti Järvinen ---
All Right,
spec+rpm have been updated in previously announced location. Changes this time
include:
- Install happens with %make_install. INSTALL_ROOT is still required in
addition to DESTDIR so length
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316772
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Jer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #43 from Ralf Senderek ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #37)
> I have concerns about the bundled cryptlib:
...
> Why was this classified as "Not applicable"? I don't see why cryptlib
> shouldn't be shipped separately
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #42 from Ralf Senderek ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #37)
> I have concerns about the bundled cryptlib:
In order to resolve the legal issue that has led to the
blocking of the cryptobone package once and for all, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316772
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325671
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1325690
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325690
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1325671
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325690
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325690
Bug ID: 1325690
Summary: Review Request: slice - Java library for efficiently
working with heap and off-heap memory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325689
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325689
Bug ID: 1325689
Summary: Review Request: jackson-datatype-jdk8 - Add-on module
for Jackson to support JDK 8 data types
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325688
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325688
Bug ID: 1325688
Summary: Review Request: jackson-datatype-jsr310 - Add-on
module to support JSR-310 (Java 8 Date & Time API)
data types
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #16 from Orion Poplawski ---
It's an EPEL7 thing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts:Python3EPEL
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Ack, thanks for catching that.
Is there a reason to use %{python3_pkgversion}? By definition I don't think it
can ever be anything other than 3?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
arquillian-core-1.1.11-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
shrinkwrap-resolver-2.2.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment #14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230213
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Ig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
Bug ID: 1325672
Summary: Review Request: jmxutils - JMX MBean Utilities
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325671
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318381
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
gtengine-2.3-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325671
Bug ID: 1325671
Summary: Review Request: jol - Java Object Layout
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Ass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ignate...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325477
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ignate...@redhat.com
Blocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318381
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
gtengine-2.3-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305365
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
concurrentunit-0.4.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246790
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System ---
mdp-0.7.4-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318381
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315307
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315193
Bug 1315193 depends on bug 1315097, which changed state.
Bug 1315097 Summary: please provide a package of jsoncpp for epel6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315097
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315193
Bug 1315193 depends on bug 1315307, which changed state.
Bug 1315307 Summary: Review Request: libarchive3 - A library for handling
streaming archive formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315307
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315193
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
cmake3-3.5.1-1.el6, jsoncpp-0.10.5-1.el6, libarchive3-3.1.2-1.el6 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315307
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
cmake3-3.5.1-1.el6, jsoncpp-0.10.5-1.el6, libarchive3-3.1.2-1.el6 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255857
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13618858
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255857
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1279201
--- Comment #14 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279201
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1255857
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #23 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
It looks like the Electron/Chromium issue is the most serious one. OTOH, the
fact that Atom has a lot of dependencies on Node.js package isn't a big issue:
there are already about 1000 such packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #19 from Adam Huffman ---
Hi David,
If you can update this to 15.08.10, I'll try to find time to review it.
Recently I've been building it for my own use on Copr, using minimal changes to
the upstream spec, but yours is much more
62 matches
Mail list logo
