https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325023
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Bonzini ---
The separate -tools-doc subpackage was requested during the package review, the
Fedora package guidelines suggest doing this if the documentation is large.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326170
Bug ID: 1326170
Summary: Review Request: php-aws-php-sns-message-validator -
Amazon SNS message validation
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169
Bug ID: 1326169
Summary: Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to
easily output colored text, special formats, and more
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Will post review tomorrow. Sorry for the delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
--- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks Rex,
Taken #1325469
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
--- Comment #1 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Some points about review -
1/
When running fedora-review, this will give an error about .desktop file which
is bogus.
.desktop file is installed under %{_datadir}/xfce4/panel-plugins
2/
fedora-rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
Bug ID: 1326151
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-calculator-plugin - A calculator
plugin for the Xfce4 panel
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System ---
zipios-2.1.1-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f49e29071
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
zipios-2.1.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3b2140233d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc22
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26a2a4f89f
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc23
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b28ac9a3e6
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc24
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc24 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3d8df355cf
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc23
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b28ac9a3e6
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc24
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc24 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3d8df355cf
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc22
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26a2a4f89f
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #44 from Ralf Senderek ---
(In reply to Ralf Senderek from comment #42)
> (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #37)
> > I have concerns about the bundled cryptlib:
In a private conversation with Peter Gutmann I have confirmed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #6 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
PSM is an acronym for "Performance Scaled Messaging"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
No reason except my ignorance :)
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord.spec
SRPM URL:
http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord-3.0.0-5.20160317gitb17d063.fc25.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318278
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov ---
Randy, thanks for the review!
I'll send some patches upstream asap and ask for licensing doc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318278
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Ran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317183
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
why do not use
%jpackage_script neurord.StochDiff "" ""
jhdf5:jhdfobj:log4j/log4j-core:log4j/log4j-api:jblas:commons-cli:neurord
neurord true
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316676
--- Comment #9 from Nikolai Kondrashov ---
Thanks, Jakub!
Hmm, the .spec file actually specifies GPLv2+. I'm not sure what's happening
here. Could it actually be complaining about install-sh being MIT/X11 license,
which isn't mentioned in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #13 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Mistyped the URL, sorry.
Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord.spec
SRPM URL:
http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord-3.0.0-4.20160317gitb17d063.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318278
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316772
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317183
Bug 1317183 depends on bug 1316767, which changed state.
Bug 1316767 Summary: Review Request: erlang-fast_tls - TLS / SSL native driver
for Erlang / Elixir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316767
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
ERROR: 'Error 404 downloading
http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/neurord-3.0.0-4.20160317gitb17d063.src.rpm'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316767
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316676
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel mod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316676
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Hrozek ---
tl;dr - We should double-check the license and optionally check if we can
conditionalize buildroot, but that's really not a big deal. Otherwise looks
good!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
> Patched jdfh5 has been built in rawhide a few days ago, can you continue the
> review?
>
> (The update of jhdf5 for F24 could also be pushed to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Patched jdfh5 has been built in rawhide a few days ago, can you continue the
review?
(The update of jhdf5 for F24 could also be pushed to stable, but I'd prefer to
wait and see if any issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322846
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #6)
> My complaints -
>
> 1/
>
> [?]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
> (~1MB) or number of files.
> Note: Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-lasagne-0.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-89f7a18dbe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-lasagne-0.1-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9b776b219d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324477
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
Thx for the review. I requested the license file here:
https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber-ruby-wire/issues/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317183
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316767
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jer...@jcline.org |rbar...@redhat.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323181
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
> Nope, the functionality is the same. For sure I want to maintain the same
> spec file across all Fedora's and EPEL 7, so I'll see what can I do.
You should provide /usr/bin/docker-squash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316772
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jer...@jcline.org |rbar...@redhat.com
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317183
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok.
Source archive is original (SHA-256:
f0d8e0f77d12122cf884bf48f0a65883eb208f8222a58b52d2e720d379f675ed). Ok.
Summary verified from lib/Test/Requires/Git.pm. Ok.
Descri
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-lasagne
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|python-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
python-breathe-4.2.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c7b2eae53b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-breathe-4.2.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-39739947bd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
python-breathe-4.2.0-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-45ebefd7af
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-lasagna
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324233
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #7 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #6)
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
> names).
> [!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
>
> Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yes, I can do the review.
https://github.com/nikhilm/qhttpserver/commit/a051b3773b2c2dc123da79568c7c1e35cd511dc1
suggests that qhttpserver is not worth packaging on its own. It's really up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #6 from Neil Horman ---
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(robert.amato@inte
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Ig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Ok, I'll use yours as-is then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323181
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services
> for a nicer way to specify Source URL that gives an archive with a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
[ignatenko@ignatenko createrepo_c]$ sudo dnf install python2-theano
Last metadata expiration check: 0:26:37 ago on Mon Apr 11 15:57:19 2016.
Dependencies resolved.
=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
I looks mostly OK except that there's only python-theano and python3-theano.
It doesn't provide a python2-theano.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297821
Dave Olsthoorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
--- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean ---
Here's quick release that fixes just the license and description issues:
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/pag.spec
SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SRPMS/pag-0.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322168
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1322166 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean ---
Ah, I didn't know about `subprocess.run`. Seems nice!
https://pagure.io/pag/issue/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773485
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Blocks|1315609
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
dennis.dalessan...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr |
|o...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324477
Pavel Valena changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Pav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298963
Marcos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324233
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-toolz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
--- Comment #14 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #8)
> The spec file indicates this is GPL or BSD licensed, but the COPYING
> file
> in the source indicates GPLv2
fixed.
>
> [x]: License file installed when any s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ocrdma-dev.pdl@br
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #5 from Neil Horman ---
perfect, thank you! I'll run the review now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
--- Comment #13 from Honggang LI ---
Created attachment 1145930
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1145930&action=edit
fedora review comment
I created a patch to fix those issues addressed by Neil in comment #8. So,
please ap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325023
--- Comment #14 from Cole Robinson ---
(In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #11)
> > + make -C BaseTools
> > Stop using make, use the m alias! Sleeping 1...
>
> What's this?
>
> Also the log looks like a parallel build basetools is attemp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
robert.am...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
|l.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt ---
Created attachment 1145900
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1145900&action=edit
SRPM from RHEL 7.2
For reference, here's the libpsm2 SRPM from RHEL 7.2.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #4 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #3)
> Please replace the package name hfi-psm1 with libpsm2, as we had imported
> it into RHEL-7.2 with name 'libpsm2'.
True, this would make our life easier. Thou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318969
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #3 from Honggang LI ---
Paul,
Please replace the package name hfi-psm1 with libpsm2, as we had imported it
into RHEL-7.2 with name 'libpsm2'.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173296
It is will be an issue if fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306629
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1324020 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1306629 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
ocrdma-dev@broadcom.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ocrdma-dev.pdl@br |
|oadcom
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
