https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #72 from Fedora Update System ---
cjdns-17.3-10.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-20110221-15.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320583
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
php-swiftmailer-5.4.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #71 from Fedora Update System ---
cjdns-17.3-10.el7, nacl-20110221-15.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990423
Bug 990423 depends on bug 837050, which changed state.
Bug 837050 Summary: Review Request: nacl - Networking and Cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837050
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
cjdns-17.3-10.el7, nacl-20110221-15.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265685
--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System ---
sylfilter-0.8-10.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet ---
Good catch, fixed:
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/81b0c677bf9ca89bede984d71481e4e3afab8574
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/81b0c677bf9ca89bede984d71481e4e3afab8574
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Thanks!
SCM request open on pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
Nick Coghlan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Ni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323966
--- Comment #12 from Nick Coghlan ---
Thanks folks! I'll finish up the rest of the review today and post the full
checklist.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines says "use dashes in
preference to underscores". I would suggest changing the name to
"native-client".
SRPM gives 404 :(
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #21 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I don't think that there's a requirement to have a license in every file. At
least the guidelines don't say anything like that. The guidelines say that the
license should be unambiguous, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter ---
I'm choosing to use the "effective" license of the combined code, opting not to
list every possible license.
For example, LGPL combined with GPL is effectively GPL.
See also:
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-breathe-4.2.0-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d01d9f4466
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Biggest issue is the license. Please fix that.
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #9)
> It's in %posttrans
yes indeed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #10 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter ---
It's in %posttrans
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I am running fedora-review as we speak, but looking at the spec file, it looks
like update-desktop-database is missing under %post ..
Detailed review to follow.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #20 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #19)
> The license information is now specified in the README, and in the file that
> contains main(), src/main/java/neurord/StochDiff.java. As before
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326521
Bug ID: 1326521
Summary: Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client -
Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323181
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Created attachment 1146671
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146671&action=edit
updated spec file
Please see the attached spec file. It simplifies stuff quite a bit by usi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324636
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
> I took in Dennis' changes and Zbigniew's suggestions.
Not really, I don't see python_provide anywhere, also no version change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324270
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325452
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Janet Morgan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1315489
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
--- Comment #4 from Jay Greguske ---
I took in Dennis' changes and Zbigniew's suggestions.
SPEC URL:
https://people.redhat.com/jgregusk/not-piracy/srpms/python-multilib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://people.redhat.com/jgregusk/not-piracy/srpms/python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302904
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #46 from Tom "spot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
Sam Nicholls changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1131121
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
Bug ID: 1326504
Summary: Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput
sequencing data formats (required for `samtools`)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #45 from Ralf Senderek ---
(In reply to Ralf Senderek from comment #44)
> (In reply to Ralf Senderek from comment #42)
> > (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #37)
> > > I have concerns about the bundled cryptlib:
These are t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229913
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318278
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318278
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-cuttlefish-2.0.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-97f9314c9a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |needinfo?(ocrdma-dev.pdl@br
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ---
Given the annoyance of a certain RPM bug, we aren't sure it's safe to rely on
triggers in all cases so FPC hasn't documented them. We will once we know
exactly which cases can be relied upon.
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326274
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Sorry, I clossed by mistake. Do you need a sponsor?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
Bug 1187084 depends on bug 1279104, which changed state.
Bug 1279104 Summary: Review Request: python-pbkdf2 - password-based key
derivation in pure Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268083
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
Bug 1187084 depends on bug 1279104, which changed state.
Bug 1279104 Summary: Review Request: python-pbkdf2 - password-based key
derivation in pure Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268093
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/apigen(php-apigen-
theme-bootstrap, php-apigen-theme-default), /usr/sha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146617
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146617&action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146616
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146616&action=edit
phpcompatinfo-lib.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB built Mar 07 2016 07:28:32 CET
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146615
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146615&action=edit
phpcompatinfo-full.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB built Mar 07 2016 07:28:32 CET
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146614
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146614&action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146611
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146611&action=edit
phpcompatinfo-lib.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB built Mar 07 2016 07:28:32 CET
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146610
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146610&action=edit
phpcompatinfo-full.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB built Mar 07 2016 07:28:32 CET
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kantecki ---
Thanks Neil! 01.org website auto renames attachments - sorry for that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #23 from William Moreno ---
Well, we need to follow current packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bundling_and_Duplication_of_system_libraries
"Fedora packages should make every effort to avoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146608
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146608&action=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20
Command line :/usr/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146607
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146607&action=edit
phpcompatinfo-lib.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB built Mar 07 2016 07:28:32 CET
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
--- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1146606
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1146606&action=edit
phpcompatinfo-full.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB built Mar 07 2016 07:28:32 CET
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320532
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
The license information is now specified in the README, and in the file that
contains main(), src/main/java/neurord/StochDiff.java. As before the text of
the license is specified in LICENSE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nhor...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
pag-0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-661496dd88
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
pag-0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e1946c7c76
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326443
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326443
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326443
Sean Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
Version|rawhi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326443
Bug ID: 1326443
Summary: Review Request: re2c - Tool for generating C-based
recognizers from regular expressions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302904
--- Comment #3 from Morten Stevens ---
Okay, please check:
Updated SRPM:
https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/cacti/cacti-0.8.8g-1.fc25.src.rpm
Updated SPEC: https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/cacti/cacti.spec
All objections should be resolved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Miroslav Lisik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #28 from David Brown ---
Adam,
Some of these we can fix as package managers others (a lot of the errors) the
slurm guys need to fix.
slurm.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/bin/salloc
Potential security issue as its calli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #27 from David Brown ---
Adam,
Okay here's a smaller rpmlint output.
$ rpmlint results/15.08.10/1.el7/slurm-*.rpm
slurm.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 15.08.10-1
['15.08.10-1.el7.centos', '15.08.10-1.centos']
slurm.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1326170
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326170
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1264654 (php-aws-sdk3)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||php-league-climate
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326170
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||php-aws-php-sns-message-val
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317183
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317182
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #26 from Adam Huffman ---
I see you've already done that - thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #25 from Adam Huffman ---
Hi David,
There's certainly no lack of things to clean up in the upstream build
process...
With my Copr builds I did the minimum to make the upstream spec file work.
Perhaps you could add the FORTIFY_SOU
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #24 from David Brown ---
I should mention that those errors are from me commenting out all my sed rpath
commands in the spec posted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318278
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/erlang-cuttlefish
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #23 from David Brown ---
Adam,
The issue I was trying to fix was when rpmlint errors about the following...
slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libpmi.so.0.0.0
['/usr/lib64']
slurm-pam_slurm.x86_64: E: binar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325477
--- Comment #1 from Mike Molina ---
Scratch build satisfactory for rawhide (f25) through koji system.
Koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13630849
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324477
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-cucumber-wire
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326277
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326277
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326274
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1323209 (base-minimization)
Refer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yselk...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #22 from Adam Huffman ---
Hi David,
It's also worth mentioning that there are systemd unit files in the upstream
source now. While you might want to patch them, you shouldn't need to include
your own versions anymore.
Cheers,
Ada
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo