https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #2 from Adam Huffman ---
See also:
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
Adam Huffman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
Adam Huffman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
Adam Huffman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bl...@verdurin.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
ocrdma-dev@broadcom.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ocrdma-dev.pdl@br |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Created attachment 1148304
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1148304=edit
patch to fix docs generation
Would be better for py2 subpackage to require
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318781
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pygments-markdown-lexer-0.1.0.dev39-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327911
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
I don't know if the previous maintainer did, but judging by the opinions that
the developers in the suckless community have, I don't think they'd
particularly want to have a .desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
xfwm4-themes-4.10.0-7.el7 xfce4-settings-4.12.0-7.el7
xfce4-xkb-plugin-0.7.1-4.el7 xfce4-smartbookmark-plugin-0.4.6-4.el7
xfce4-datetime-plugin-0.6.2-6.el7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654
--- Comment #11 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review! SCM requests opened via pkgdb.
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #10)
> you may want to switch autoloader without @include_once.
I will make this fix after
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327911
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327911
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Also here, "use dashes in preference to underscores."
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to John Dulaney from comment #5)
> You might want to remove the commented out lines.
I wanted to keep it in case jupyter-troubleshoot really exists as entry-point.
But
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Antti Järvinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323334
Antti Järvinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323334
Antti Järvinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
paul.j.re...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1147688 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #21 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
I think I have addressed the issues surrounding the Source0 tag. I will attach
the new spec file template in just a little bit.
My solution was just to use the following comments and leave the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328248
Bug ID: 1328248
Summary: Review Request: Python-pysword. As Python egg which
allows python programs to read Sword files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|zbys...@in.waw.pl |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
OK, sorry, now that I look at the linked section in the guidelines, it doesn't
actually say how to use the macro. Please see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
--- Comment #31 from Gergely Polonkai ---
Here is the link to my Koji job (i686 and x86_64 passed, arm is still running
as of writing):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13701740
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
--- Comment #30 from Gergely Polonkai ---
Thanks for the Fedora space, I have uploaded the new version there:
https://gergelypolonkai.fedorapeople.org/valadoc/valadoc.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319519
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327083
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
Philippe Makowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #5 from John Dulaney ---
You might want to remove the commented out lines.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 1148257 [details]
> tweaks to the spec file
>
> I wanted to try the review of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
Jay Greguske changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
--- Comment #6 from Jay Greguske ---
I haven't used this macro before. Something like this?
http://www.fpaste.org/357076/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
pag-0.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323128
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-virtualenv-api-2.1.8-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323128
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
pipsi-0.9-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326151
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
xfce4-calculator-plugin-0.5.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327911
Alexander Ploumistos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302909
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
WOW! I totally missed the review :/ I will be updating to 8.1 and addressing
the comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #20 from Ira Weiny ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #18)
> (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #15)
> > This is the template for the spec file that we use to generate the
> > hfi1-psm.spec file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Git-Repository-Plugin-AUTOLOAD-1.003-1.fc24
perl-Test-Requires-Git-1.005-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050
John W. Linville changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|linvi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #19 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #18)
> (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #15)
> > This is the template for the spec file that we use to generate the
> > hfi1-psm.spec file.
>
> So
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134342
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
--- Comment #4 from Michal Schmidt ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
To be very precise, the License tag should say:
License:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Requires-Git-1.005-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-71128b1ec2
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325763
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
--- Comment #23 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #22)
> Just because the source has multiple license options, doesn't mean you just
> pass that through to the binary. The dual license option is for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
SCM request: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/4943
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
SCM request: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/4942
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
--- Comment #22 from Neil Horman ---
Concur with comment 20, we need the latest package from upstream
However, the license does need to get fixed. As per the licensing guidelines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327939
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-k8sclient
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327939
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek ---
*** Bug 1327249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #18 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #15)
> This is the template for the spec file that we use to generate the
> hfi1-psm.spec file.
So the resistance to changing the spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #17 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #13)
> > Could you please use a full URL in the Source tag?
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
>
> I need to know if this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13697941
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: keytool - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: keytool - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328041
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #1)
> Issues
> ==
> - The summary and description are outdated, Sun doesn't exist anymore.
> - maven-plugin subpackage needs to obsolete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek ---
Because keytool is the name of JDK's utility, it would be better if the package
was named differently, e.g. mojohaus-keytool or maven-keytool
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328064
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328065
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328065
Bug ID: 1328065
Summary: Review Request: wildfly-build-tools - Wildfly build
and provisioning tools
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328064
Bug ID: 1328064
Summary: Review Request: wildfly-elytron - Security,
Authentication, and Authorization SPIs for the WildFly
project
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328064
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1328063
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1328064
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1328063
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1328062
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
Bug ID: 1328063
Summary: Review Request: wildfly-common - A WildFly common
utilities project
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327544
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
==
- The summary and description are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Bug ID: 1328062
Summary: Review Request: jetbrains-annotations - IntelliJ IDEA
Annotations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Underwood ---
Currently building under mock fails during sphinx run to build docs:
running build
running build_py
running build_scripts
creating build/scripts-3.5
copying and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
Jonathan Underwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328041
Bug ID: 1328041
Summary: Review Request: musicqueue - Music orgainizer and
player based on a fork of Guayadeque
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327939
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327939
--- Comment #5 from Chandan Kumar ---
Thanks Parag for the review.
Here is the updated
SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-k8sclient.spec
SRPM Link :
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo