https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390
--- Comment #3 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #2)
> [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
> infinipath-psm-debuginfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326217
--- Comment #2 from Peng Wu ---
Spec URL:
https://pwu.fedorapeople.org/fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pwu.fedorapeople.org/fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts/google-noto-emoji-fonts-20160406-2.fc23.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #36 from N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327828
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please separate each review request into a separate bug. Make the title of each
bug reflect the package name and summary, e.g. "numix-gtk-theme - Flat GTK
theme with light and dark elements".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324235
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Sergio Pascual from comment #1)
> If you have the time, please create an issue upstream so that they include
> the LICENSE file in the distribution tarball.
Done: https://github.com/pytoolz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324235
Sergio Pascual changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325452
--- Comment #2 from Scott K Logan ---
Thank you, William!
Per Fedora packaging guidelines [1], I have opened a pull request encouraging
upstream to add a LICENSE file [2].
Please let me know if there is anything else I can do!
Thanks,
--sc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316982
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pytest-testmon-0.8.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c164e0f3b6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316982
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pytest-testmon-0.8.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8a8df6b7d5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325469
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
plasma-discover-5.6.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321825
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-units-0.06-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324367
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
apigen-4.1.2-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321825
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324367
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
libkml-1.3.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301063
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301063
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-congressclient-1.2.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327939
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126
--- Comment #8 from William Moreno ---
Just provide the doc subpackage, can be realle usefull.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201338
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(muri...@br.ibm.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209054
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
ping
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327828
--- Comment #6 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
After reading through the fedora wiki i think it makes more sense to split this
into three different packages. Before that it was all handled in one spec file
for the pure reason of lazyness.
Please fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #24 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #21)
> I think I have addressed the issues surrounding the Source0 tag. I will
> attach the new spec file template in just a little bit.
>
> My solution wa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Also, should the name be 'python-jupyter-ipykernel' ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324270
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325452
--- Comment #1 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
Ask upstream to include the license text in the git repo and in the tarball,
sorry but this is a M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324957
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Thank you for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324957
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324270
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
paul.j.re...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1148280 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Thanks again for quick review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304467
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Haïkel G
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner ---
Hello Antti,
thanks for your interest in this review.
Most of your questions have nothing to do with the package review, propably
they should go to upstream.
> [-]: %check is present and all tests pass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ho...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(tomasz.kantecki@i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Tomasz Kantecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tomasz.kantecki@i |
|ntel.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ocrdma-dev.pdl@br
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #5)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> > # use system coreutils
> > rm testdata/sum
>
> This is only a test resource, it's not executed during build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554101
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat...@redhat.com
--- Comment #34 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nhor...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287201
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1328542
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #16 from Orion Poplawski ---
Meh, it seems that moving to '-'s seems to be the way to go. So yeah, let's
treat this as a rename, so you'll need the appropriate obsoletes/provides if
you don't already.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> # use system coreutils
> rm testdata/sum
This is only a test resource, it's not executed during build.
> %pom_remove_plugin :maven-jar-plugin
> # Generate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #25 from Neal Gompa ---
@Tom,
I see this bit in the spec:
> %if 0
> # see https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=501318
> BuildRequires:libsrtp-devel >= 1.4.4
> %endif
The conditional looks like it would al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski ---
I don't read the "prefer - to _" as a reason to change upstream's name, as I
feel "follow upstream" trumps that. So I would suggest keeping the existing
python-jupyter_core package. I've been complet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
i used for my package iq80-snappy name
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #3 from Sam Nicholls ---
Hi Adam,
That does appear to be a rather serious problem, I've updated the SPEC and SRPM
(available via the same URLs) in the hope that the package no longer
effectively requires itself as a dependency.
Sa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
can import this package also for F23 and F24?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
these tasks are unnecessary
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-source-plugin
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-javadoc-plugin
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-release-plugin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
can you add this to the spec file?
# use system coreutils
rm testdata/sum
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-jar-plugin
# Generate OSGi manifest file
%pom_xpath_set "pom:packaging" bundle
%pom_add_plugin org.apach
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1328510
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
Bug ID: 1328508
Summary: Review Request: dain-snappy - Snappy compression
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327828
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter ---
In particular, one applicable policy/guideline pertaining to this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_and_Duplication_of_system_libraries
"Fedora packages sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327828
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: numix - |Review Request: numix -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Oh, one more thing: I'd suggest adding "%global _docdir_fmt %{name}", because
/usr/share/doc/python-jupyter-client-doc/ is just silly, it's nicer to keep it
all in /usr/share/doc/python-jupyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
##doc html → %doc html
Now the BR and R have diverged, python2-traitlets vs python-traitlets,
python2-zmq vs python-zmq.
And we also have the issue with existing python-jupyter_core. Yikes!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Neil Horman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Underwood ---
The optimal outcome here would be for Thomas to co-maintain the existing
package and merge the changes back in (including updating to the most recent
release).
It might also be a good idea to treat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Underwood ---
I'm pasting the review anyway, as hopefully it'll be of some use once this
situation is resolved. In particular the rpmlint errors need investigation.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
Jonathan Underwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@cora.nwra.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Underwood ---
OK... what's actually going on here? We already have a package
python-jupyter_core in Fedora which seems to be exactly this (although it's a
point release behind).
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
fabtests-1.3.0-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0264e64287
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311045
--- Comment #25 from Neil Horman ---
yes, you haven't imported the package or built it yet. Please follow the
process here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Tomasz Kantecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tomasz.kantecki@i |
|ntel.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Spura ---
You can use jupyter with either python2 or python3, so I think it makes sense
to ship both until python2 will become no longer relevant. I _guess_ this will
still take a few years (given that /usr/bin/pyth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
--- Comment #10 from Honggang LI ---
$rpm -qpR fabtests-1.3.0-3.fc25.x86_64.rpm | grep bin
/bin/bash
/usr/bin/ruby
Thanks for the patch. I will apply it and remove 'Requires: ruby', as it is
unnecessary.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fabtests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-aws-sdk3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/classified-ads
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328374
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Underwood ---
OK, great, seems the flurry of activity has died down, so I'll continue to
review.
Quick question: are there consumers of the python2 subpackage within the
jupyter stack? If not, why don't we simply
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
--- Comment #7 from Michal Schmidt ---
Created attachment 1148539
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1148539&action=edit
[PATCH] adjust shebang lines in rft_yaml_to_junit_xml and runfabtests.sh
> Requires: ruby
I'm not sure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837
--- Comment #36 from Matthias Hensler ---
borgbackup-1.0.2-1.el7.x86_64 is missing a dependency for python34-setuptools.
[root@cams ~]# yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing borgbackup
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 1148304 [details]
> patch to fix docs generation
>
> Would be better for py2 subpackage to require python2-jupyter-core, not
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> %description is useless :(
>
> # Must do the subpackages' install first because the scripts in /usr/bin are
> # overwritten with every setup.py i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328374
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328374
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147921
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1315609
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390
--- Comment #1 from Honggang LI ---
koji task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13712910
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390
Bug ID: 1328390
Summary: Review Request: infinipath-psm - Intel Performance
Scaled Messaging (PSM) Libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328374
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
with fedora-review -b 1328374 --plugins Java -m fedora-rawhide-i386
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ rm -rf mnemonicsetter-mnemonicsetter_0.4
+ /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/mnemonicsetter_0.4.tar.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327497
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327176
--- Comment #6 from Honggang LI ---
Spec URL:
http://people.redhat.com/honli/.6c4263a86d3cd6fa84aba6f0abab9269/fabtests.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/honli/.6c4263a86d3cd6fa84aba6f0abab9269/fabtests-1.3.0-3.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327497
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
