https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #24 from Stuart Campbell ---
Could you please point me at an example that links to jquery so I can see what
the correct thing to do is ? I can find lots of examples that just bundle it,
but none that do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #42 from russell.w.mcgu...@intel.com ---
Question: Does the tarball we generate need to contain any spec file. After all
these comments above, and viewing a lot of the SRPMs from Fedora21-23 download
sites, I see that most all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304467
--- Comment #4 from Pradeep Kilambi ---
Thanks Haikel. I updated the spec and srpm with your above suggestions. Please
review
Spec URL:
https://pkilambi.fedorapeople.org/python-aodhclient/python-aodhclient.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324367
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
libkml-1.3.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
php-aws-sdk3-3.18.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
apigen-4.1.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1000885
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323871
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
phonon-qt5-4.8.3-2.el7, phonon-qt5-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-2.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323871
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320725
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
phonon-qt5-4.8.3-2.el7, phonon-qt5-backend-gstreamer-4.8.2-2.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323871
Bug 1323871 depends on bug 1320725, which changed state.
Bug 1320725 Summary: Review Request: phonon-qt5 - Multimedia framework api (Qt
5 version)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320725
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #41 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
Given that this review was going so slowly, we had two meetings this morning
with:
Intel: Ira Weiny, John Fleck, Russ McGuire, and me.
Redhat: Michal Schmidt
In the meeting we clarified what we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
Antti Järvinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188
Dan Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks, good catch. I updated to 1.1.2 and fixed the requires. Christopher
seems to have left Fedora work entirely, so if you'd like to take the review
that would be great, and I'd be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #13 from Neil Horman ---
What you need to do is go through the code and determine which code is licensed
in which way. Your spec file indicates its all BSD, but the docs in the source
tarball indicate their
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Release|--- |trunk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #40 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #35)
> (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #32)
> > Created attachment 1149512 [details]
> > Spec file for 10.1.0.
>
> in the spec:
> > # The source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
paul.j.re...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1149513 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #38 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #34)
> (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #31)
> > As such, I have changed that version to 10.1.0. But, that version is subject
> > to change
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #7 from Fabrizio Furano ---
Hi Adrien,
python is used for the authorization. Good point about py26 and epel5. I
remove the requirement...
f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Adrien Devresse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ade...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #6 from Nikos Roussos ---
I built and installed it but it fails to run. Message I'm getting when I run it
from terminal:
QQmlApplicationEngine failed to load component
qrc:/ui/main.qml:2 module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #37 from Doug Ledford ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #34)
> (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #31)
> > As such, I have changed that version to 10.1.0. But, that version is subject
> > to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329668
Bug ID: 1329668
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-rhea -reactive AMQP 1.0
library.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
Fabrizio Furano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fur...@cern.ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
John Trowbridge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #36 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
Michal, can we please talk on the phone so that we can discuss your needs for
versioning and I can supply you with our plans for the 10.1 release? There
seems to be a communication breakdown on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050
Panu Matilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Please see my comment #21, I believe it addresses your concerns. If I'm wrong,
please point me at the place in the guidelines that requires a license header
in every
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329441
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
can-utils-20160229git-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-721f1da0ae
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
can-utils-20160229git-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2c9f971c67
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
can-utils-20160229git-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8c1e55e18e
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #35 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #32)
> Created attachment 1149512 [details]
> Spec file for 10.1.0.
in the spec:
> # The source to make this rpm was created at Intel from a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #12 from robert.am...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Neil Horman from comment #6)
>
> This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
> also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327784
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nauty-2.6.5-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1c5728a7a8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329441
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #34 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #31)
> As such, I have changed that version to 10.1.0. But, that version is subject
> to change
I'm confused. Do you mean that this is just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306629
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306945
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
Alexander Kurtakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
Jonathan Underwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329577
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1329341 (RDO-NEWTON)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329577
Bug ID: 1329577
Summary: Review Request: python-microversion-parse - OpenStack
microversion header parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
python-librosa-0.4.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-edea31c6fc
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
python-librosa-0.4.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-13db7afc5d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326217
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/google-noto-emoji-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
61 matches
Mail list logo