https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225229
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|light-locker|
--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
dain-snappy-0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-226fd6ddf7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
dain-snappy-0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ebcb183853
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330833
Bug ID: 1330833
Summary: Review Request: python-bitstring - Simple
construction, analysis and modification of binary data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
So the version scheme is not unknown to Fedora. The scheme is commonly used by
applications that try to enforce a consistent filename structure across
platforms. The style of versioned library is the same use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@kernel.org
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326274
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-spec-0.5.0-0.1.git6e08c69.fc22 has been
pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-review-1.7.2-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326274
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-spec-0.5.0-0.1.git6e08c69.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-review-1.7.2-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
horai-ume-fonts-610-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326274
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-spec-0.5.0-0.1.git6e08c69.el6 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122577
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
git-xcleaner-1.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324861
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
php-league-plates-3.1.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
--- Comment #13 from Samuel Gyger ---
And the last package for this new effort to get electrum into fedora. Sorry for
the delay as I was stuck on fedora 21 for quite a while, but a new computer,
enough power for virtualization got me running o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330343
--- Comment #4 from Michael Hampton ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jens Lody from comment #2)
> > A problem is, that the haproxy package also contains a binary named iprange,
> > which seems to be not compatibl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-klauspost-crc32-0-0.1.gita3b15ae.fc24 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-158c7ffcf3
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-klauspost-crc32-0-0.1.gita3b15ae.el6 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a8b9d8dfc
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-klauspost-crc32-0-0.1.gita3b15ae.fc22 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-43efc48278
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc22,
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc22,
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-klauspost-crc32-0-0.1.gita3b15ae.fc23 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dbe9ae39e0
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
--- Comment #12 from Samuel Gyger ---
Hey William, thank you for your offer.
I was stuck on fedora 21 for quite a while, but a new computer, enough power
for virtualization got me running on packaging this stuff again.
Here the updated files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
--- Comment #5 from Samuel Gyger ---
Hello to all of you, thank you for your input.
I was stuck on fedora 21 for quite a while, but a new computer, enough power
for virtualization got me running on packaging this stuff again.
Here the updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307149
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122577
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122577
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
git-xcleaner-1.5-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc23,
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
mkdocs-0.15.3-2.fc23, mkdocs-bootstrap-0.1.1-2.fc23,
mkdocs-bootswatch-0.4.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc23,
nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307127
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330316
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Updated the SPEC with the suggestion proposed by gil
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324960
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324960
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330343
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324960
John Dulaney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330343
Jens Lody changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@jenslody.de
--- Comment #2 from Je
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312963
--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Fixed this by cleaning up the %files entry. I suspect that this is due to glibc
generating these files when other components are present in the Build
environment, however, since we don't care about i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264715
Jiri Eischmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eischm...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324957
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324960
Bug 1324960 depends on bug 1324957, which changed state.
Bug 1324957 Summary: Review Request: python-pypandoc - Thin wrapper for pandoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324957
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307149
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273579
--- Comment #20 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Python .so files have rpath set, you'll need to get rid of it
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath]. I
haven't look here, but sometimes -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #54 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #51)
> So after doing "git clean -fdx && ./makesrpm.sh" I got
> libpsm2-10.1.4-1.fc24.src.rpm
>
> Inside it there is libpsm2-10.1.4.tar.gz (that makesrpm.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329448
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330343
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
--- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/neurord
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328508
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dain-snappy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328374
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mnemonicsetter
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307132
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mkdocs-cinder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327929
--- Comment #5 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Thank you Mukundan.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272527
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330027
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326274
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330343
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273579
--- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Oh, by the way, this version gets the latest cmake version of the code from
this pull request: https://github.com/nest/nest-simulator/pull/318
I've put up the srpm too:
https://ankursinha.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273579
--- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
This is the current version, which doesn't quite work:
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/nest.spec
They use cmake, which builds the c++ bits to build the SLI version. The cmake
then ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #53 from russell.w.mcgu...@intel.com ---
Michal,
I wanted to ask isn't the Source0 tag mostly for user interaction (what you're
doing now) and documentation purposes? i.e. are there tools that use this
field?
Paul,
Please go this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #52 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #51)
># The tarball can be created by:
># git clone https://github.com/01org/opa-psm2
># cd opa-psm
Typo: cd opa-psm2
># git checkout 8f9f240380
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #51 from Michal Schmidt ---
So after doing "git clean -fdx && ./makesrpm.sh" I got
libpsm2-10.1.4-1.fc24.src.rpm
Inside it there is libpsm2-10.1.4.tar.gz (that makesrpm.sh generated using
"make dist") and a spec file libpsm2.spec.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
To be consistent with Debian packaging of capnproto, I've swapped things around
so that the tools are the main package and libraries are in a subpackage.
Since a review hasn't started, I've just gone ahead a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
horai-ume-fonts-610-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-ab7acea163
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188
--- Comment #8 from Dan Williams ---
(In reply to Krzysztof Czurylo from comment #7)
> 1) I'll remove the scripts modifying /etc/magic from the RPM spec file.
>
> 2) The optimized routines cannot be just omitted, as they are part of
> libpmem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #50 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #49)
> (In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #48)
> > On a Fedora system:
> > Pull the 10.1 branch from github to a sandbox.
> > cd sandbox
> > ./makesrpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328889
--- Comment #3 from Dave Love ---
Oh, I hadn't realized it was a requirement -- too much in the instructions to
memorize...
I'm sure they won't do it, as this is what Intel ship with their compiler, but
I'll try via the "forum", which unfortu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
horai-ume-fonts-610-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7973add9e1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
--- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Spec URL: https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-privsep.spec
SRPM URL:
https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-privsep-1.5.0-2.fc25.src.rpm
Issues raised were adressed.
--
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307132
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307149
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rdie...@math.unl.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188
--- Comment #7 from Krzysztof Czurylo ---
1) I'll remove the scripts modifying /etc/magic from the RPM spec file.
2) The optimized routines cannot be just omitted, as they are part of libpmem
API. Theoretically, to build it for non-x86_64 we
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273579
--- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I'm don't think you need to build 6 times. The python wrapper might be
independent of mpi. Can you post your latest version of the spec file, I'll try
to have a look. If the python module (.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308488
--- Comment #3 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Spec URL:
http://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/mediaconch/master/mediaconch.spec
SRPM URL:
http://koji.russianfedora.pro/kojifiles/packages/mediaconch/16.03/3.fc25.R/src/mediaconch-16.03-3.fc25.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-klauspost-crc32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301144
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/horai-ume-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #49 from Michal Schmidt ---
(In reply to paul.j.reger from comment #48)
> On a Fedora system:
> Pull the 10.1 branch from github to a sandbox.
> cd sandbox
> ./makesrpm.sh
> [...]
> The source rpm is in temp.3182/SRPMS/libpsm2-10.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-review-1.7.2-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-36c69445a6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-review-1.7.2-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e96b805c6b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-review-1.7.2-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b0561d5d2a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from gil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807
Mosaab Alzoubi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: raqm - |Review Request: libraqm -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807
--- Comment #4 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
Spec URL: http://pastebin.com/raw/AXqVRH7a
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/moceap/Raqm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00180750-libraqm/libraqm-0.1.0-3.fc25.src.rpm
Yes libraqm's better,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264945
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264945
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
mallard-rng-1.0.2-1.fc24 yelp-tools-3.18.0-3.fc24 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-63b0ce79a0
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
--- Comment #7 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
> Correct license
> > -License: GPLv2 with exceptions
Yes you're right I got confused by the plus in: "All source files are licensed
under GPLv2+CE" in the L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297550
--- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka ---
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/jmespath/go-
jmespath/cmd
[!]: Package must own all directories that it cre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330429
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||iamcal/lib_autolink
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330429
Bug ID: 1330429
Summary: Review Request: php-iamcal-lib-autolink - Adds anchors
to urls in a text
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
intel-cmt-cat-0.1.4-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-36d91d432f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
