https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327511
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Updated to 2.0.1
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/6df0e93b88e2f3240a0699b77baa4db2fe10fc1b/php/php-justinrainbow-json-schema/php-justinrainbow-json-schema.spec
Srpm:
http://rpms.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
kdepim4-4.14.10-24.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744416
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Hi robert, sorry for the delay. I got caught up in several other things. I will
have this taken care of in the next three or four days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #62 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
> Is 40-psm.rules even needed with the current hfi1 kernel driver?
> The device nodes should already have the expected mode even without this rule
> file. Please remove 40-psm.rules if that's the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330316
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1331589
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331589
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Depends On
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331589
Bug ID: 1331589
Summary: Review Request: multibit-commons - Classes and
libraries to support MultiBit projects
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
python-breathe-4.2.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #61 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #55)
I am responding to the collection of problems that you cited. One problem was
not resolved yet. All others are resolved.
Can you please give the c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #60 from Michal Schmidt ---
Paul,
on a Fedora system you can install it simply using:
dnf install fedora-review
Usually it's run like this:
fedora-review -b
... but this does not work for this review, because you haven't been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314865
--- Comment #6 from Jan Pokorný ---
Thanks again for your detailed review.
Note that in the meantime, the upstream has released 1.0 version,
and I made quite a few changes, upstreamed or not (pending PRs,
spec file customization).
Also note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230213
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rc040203@freenet.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #1)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
> = ISSUES =
> [?]: License field in t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
capnproto-0.5.3-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c023e41c9b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
capnproto-0.5.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8d746cca5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
capnproto-0.5.3-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-78c0114b50
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
capnproto-0.5.3-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4d440c2df0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424
--- Comment #5 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> Luya, thanks again for your review! I'll continue here as revanche soonish.
No problem. It is nice to be first =)
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307228
--- Comment #8 from Andrea ---
Hi Adrien,
Fabrizio tagged a new version fixing the problems you found on your initial
review:
Spec URL:
http://svn.cern.ch/guest/lcgdm/ugr/tags/dynafed_1_2_0c/packaging/rpm/specs/dynafed.spec
SRPMS:
http://g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Bug 1023776 depends on bug 1023774, which changed state.
Bug 1023774 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-port - Simple API
to write Erlang ports in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023774
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
Vincent Batts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023774
Vincent Batts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Bug 1023776 depends on bug 1023771, which changed state.
Bug 1023771 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-epmd - Erlang Port
Mapper Daemon protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023772
Vincent Batts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Bug 1023776 depends on bug 1023772, which changed state.
Bug 1023772 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-etf - Erlang
external term format encoding/decoding for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023772
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023773
Vincent Batts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Bug 1023776 depends on bug 1023773, which changed state.
Bug 1023773 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-node - An
implementation of Erlang node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023773
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #59 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
Michal, Thank you for running fedora-review (I think that is what the tool is
called?), and adding the output and analysis/distilation to this problem
report.
Can you also include instructions fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
SCM request:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/5102
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/5103
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331449
Bug ID: 1331449
Summary: Review Request: zkclient - A Zookeeper Client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327911
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Ploumistos ---
As far as I could tell, it is needed as the default terminal in order to run
curl for any downloads.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327911
Matthew Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Toma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |high
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Gro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #3)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> > What do you mean?
> I meant that the timestamps issue is also mentioned in guidelines so
> therefore I considered t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305547
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libraqm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/capnproto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331363
Bug ID: 1331363
Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-RandPasswd - Random
password generator based on FIPS-181
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331361
Bug ID: 1331361
Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Template - Send
"multipart/alternative" (text & html) email from a
Template
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807
--- Comment #6 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
VERY THANK YOU FOR FAST RESPONDING :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188
--- Comment #9 from Krzysztof Czurylo ---
Updated/fixed RPM spec:
- Always append EXTRA_CFLAGS to CFLAGS in NVML makefiles
- Use distro build flags macros when building packages
- Do not edit /etc/magic when installing NVM libraries
Spec URL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
primitive-1.2.2-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-12700be6f6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> What do you mean?
I meant that the timestamps issue is also mentioned in guidelines so therefore
I considered that the guidelines are not met.
> Solved
By solivin
53 matches
Mail list logo
