https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344231
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Oops, no, this is not a candidate for macro conditionals but rather for
cut-and-paste; but still having it in RHEL would be useful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340349
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263904
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1339913 (ghc-7.10.3)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344231
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Yes, this could be useful also for EPEL maintainers. Well, the best approach
to me would be to make this available in RHEL, too -- just to not make
maintainers to write macro-conditionals-hell because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
keepassx0-0.4.4-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326875
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
keepassx2-2.0.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326875
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343224
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343224
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
xenlism-wildfire-0-0.1.20160511gitd3b9ad2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341815
--- Comment #5 from Jerry James ---
Actually, both BRs were already in the spec. The problem is that tox invokes
pip to download various python packages when the %check script is run. I've
changed the way the %check script works, so no packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341839
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
===
Please fix the source url to chech the checksum and aprove the package.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license.
[x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336773
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
RPM Lint warning about a invalid License:
[!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license.
W: invalid-license CC-BY-SA-NC
Where does this license come? I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340152
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-certbot-apache-0.8.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b9c62ca7b9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340152
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-certbot-apache-0.8.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-21c50cf71b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340152
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340152
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-certbot-apache-0.8.0-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f8f2926fbd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ad1cee380b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dnscrypt-proxy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
ricochet-1.1.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a431412697
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
ricochet-1.1.2-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5d484b97be
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
ricochet-1.1.2-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6b8be49b4f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Jon C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
(In reply to Nikos Roussos from comment #15)
> Yes, I noticed that after submitting the comment. It would also be nice to
> include an appdata file to show up on Software Center, but it's not
> mandatory.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #16 from Nikos Roussos ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
> Various revision items are still empty ([ ]).
> Are they passed or not ? :)
These are either not applicable or have been checked manually.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #15 from Nikos Roussos ---
Yes, I noticed that after submitting the comment. It would also be nice to
include an appdata file to show up on Software Center, but it's not mandatory.
Since I'm a regular Ricochet user I'd be interest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande ---
Various revision items are still empty ([ ]).
Are they passed or not ? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this produ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #6 from Nikos Roussos ---
Yes, I have open relevant bugs upstream.
missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot
This seems to be wrong reporting from rpmlint.
https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/422
missing-call-to-setgroups-b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ricochet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342749
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342749
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|Tracking|
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks, I'll fix the icon and desktop stuff prior to import.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #10 from Nikos Roussos ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %pos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Looks good, but I missed two rpmlint errors:
dnscrypt-proxy.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid
/usr/sbin/dnscrypt-proxy
This executable is calling setuid and setgid without setgroups or initg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #4 from Nikos Roussos ---
Thanks. I fixed the license. It's MIT. The URL seems correct. Probably the site
was down a few hours ago.
SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/dnscrypt-proxy.spec
SRPM:
https://comzeradd.fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734
--- Comment #4 from mulhern ---
I have asked:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7QPY4DY4HAX34N3NCTODXYNIDGWFREDZ/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1204638
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1204638
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734
--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner ---
libsexy and libsexymm are not forbidden, either. What's your point? Can you
make a better suggestion for the package name? There's a guideline to use the
upstream project name.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1343144
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jp...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
--- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec ---
Created attachment 1166400
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1166400&action=edit
spec changes to resolve reported issues
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
--- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec ---
> * Package must own all directories that it creates.
> Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages,
> /usr/lib64/python3.5
ignore that one, must be Fedora Rawhide issue w/ pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
--- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec ---
> Source0:
> https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Replace with
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/c/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343734
mulhern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amulh...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from mul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222484
Pete Walter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189375
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341642
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Senderek ---
So I have removed the doc subpackage altogether and I have created a
file "README-manual" in which I point to the web site where users can
download the manual.pdf.
This file contains the information abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||133
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||136
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136
Bug ID: 136
Summary: Review Request: jboss-logging-tools1 - JBoss Logging
I18n Annotation Processor
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133
Bug ID: 133
Summary: Review Request: jdeparser1 - Source generator library
for Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: mediu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344094
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344249
--- Comment #1 from Adam Miller ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
- P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344415
Bug ID: 1344415
Summary: Review Request: v8-314 - JavaScript Engine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341642
--- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Unfortunately, that license is non-free. That means that if someone makes a
spin of Fedora that includes cryptlib, then sells it (even just to cover their
costs), they're in violation.
Commercial-us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/notify-sharp3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340152
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-certbot-apache
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326875
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
keepassx2-2.0.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-885487040d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
keepassx0-0.4.4-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fcd957ca82
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340152
Tim Flink changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Tim Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Thanks Jon for building this package for f24+ branches. I have approved f23
branch request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344249
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326875
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Not building on el6, working on it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
- rpmlint checks return:
dnscrypt-proxy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic ->
cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please doubl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326875
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326875
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
keepassx2-2.0.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-ffae356c46
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
keepassx0-0.4.4-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f1da178e94
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Ni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Parag, can you approve the f23 branch request please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Ni
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks, I'll have a look!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343895
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-xunitmerge
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260208
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jandex-maven-plugin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343025
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/undertow-js
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
libcxx-3.8.0-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-916f868a7c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340269
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/keepassx0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338537
--- Comment #18 from Graham Leggett ---
I am, yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
--- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä ---
Note that AFAIU wget OR curl is needed, and so because rpm already pulls in
curl, the wget dep is superfluous.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264700
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@cicku.me |comzer...@fedoraproject.org
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222662
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|comzer...@fedoraproject.org
--
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343895
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344245
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343895
--- Comment #8 from Arie Bregman ---
Updated:
Spec URL:
https://bitbucket.org/abregman/bregman-rpms/downloads/python-xunitmerge-1.0.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/abregman/bregman-rpms/downloads/python-xunitmerge.spec
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344261
--- Comment #2 from Pete Walter ---
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14434169
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pro
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo