https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274930
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(e...@mayorgalinux.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
--- Comment #11 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Colin Walters from comment #9)
> Hum? It's clearly LGPLv2.
> https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/blob/master/COPYING
I see that source files do mention LGPLv2, but the COPYING f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
--- Comment #10 from Colin Walters ---
Regarding the bash completion dir...I dunno, shouldn't bash-completion own it?
We have a lot of packages ignoring this right now anyways.
(Aside: the whole rpm "directory ownership" thing is a truly rid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
--- Comment #9 from Colin Walters ---
Hum? It's clearly LGPLv2.
https://github.com/projectatomic/bubblewrap/blob/master/COPYING
What is the output of
/mnt/repositories/pkgs/review/bubblewrap/packaging/bubblewrap/licensecheck.txt
?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343608
--- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme ---
In addition to Igor's remarks that will improve the package :
- In setup, you have rm -rf justbases.egg-info but I don't see that file. But
you should remove src/pyprocdev.egg-info
- You should fix this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353343
--- Comment #2 from Julian Sikorski ---
Creating appdata is a bigger project. In the meantime, I fixed the license
issue and a few others.
Spec URL: https://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/qmc2/qmc2.spec
SRPM URL: https://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408
--- Comment #6 from Julian Sikorski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #5)
> > lasem.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblasem-0.4.so.4.0.3
> > exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
> probably can be filled to upstream
https://bugzilla.gnome.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
--- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #13)
> Can you change the Source0 URL to the following:
>
> %{url}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
>
> That's a direct URL that things like spectool ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from Raphae
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #13)
> Can you change the Source0 URL to the following:
>
> %{url}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
>
> That's a direct URL that things like spectool ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321687
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-tracejs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #27 from Jarod Wilson ---
Ah, the problem was that the bug was still assigned to my RH login instead of
the one I have on file with the Fedora package database. I'm updating some
permissions on the package now, so you can build for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #26 from tatyana ---
Ok, I see the package request has been approved. Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #56 from Rex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354016
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1271785
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271785
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1354016, 1354014, 1354018,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1271785
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354009
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1271785
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354014
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1271785
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #25 from tatyana ---
Now the sync is working. Which collection should I choose?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libi40iw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ja...@redhat.com|jarodwil...@gmail.com
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #23 from tatyana ---
Yeah, that too is an issue.
I am trying to submit a new package request, but when I enter the ticket number
= bugzilla id = 1350029 and click sync, I get "Review not approved by the
assignee of the ticket jarod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #22 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #21)
> Apparently, I need to fix the ticket number - should I send another package
> request. Is there a way to edit the first one?
Just gave it a try myself, I think the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354016
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #21 from tatyana ---
Apparently, I need to fix the ticket number - should I send another package
request. Is there a way to edit the first one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #20 from tatyana ---
I submitted a new package request:
•user: tatyana request package: libi40iw-0.5.225-1.el7.src.rpm on branch master
I am not sure if branch master was the right one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354014
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1354018
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354016
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1354018
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018
Bug ID: 1354018
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-utfx - A compact library to
encode, decode and convert UTF8 / UTF16
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353990
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1354016
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354016
Bug ID: 1354016
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-metascript - Sophisticated meta
programming in JavaScript
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353990
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1354014
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354014
Bug ID: 1354014
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-testjs - A compact testing
module for node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354014
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321687
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8)
> Why some subpackages without license files? How to validate that every
> combination installs them at least once?
Each sub-packages directly or indirectly req
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339327
--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Resubmitting, error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339327
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libinvm-i18n
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354009
Bug ID: 1354009
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-bcrypt - A bcrypt library for
NodeJS
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354009
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321687
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner ---
Why some subpackages without license files? How to validate that every
combination installs them at least once?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
--- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
Fixed. I do not see any blockers, can you approve?
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/winetricks.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/winetricks-20160627-1.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327160
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353988
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1353990
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353978
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1353990
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353990
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353990
Bug ID: 1353990
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-ascli - A uniform foundation
for unobtrusive (ASCII art in) cli apps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353988
Bug ID: 1353988
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-optjs - Probably the sole
command line option parser you'll ever need
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353988
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
--- Comment #7 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Posting default fedora-review text and I'll go through un-checked items in a
bit.
We can ignore the lack of changelog and older git commit values for now as
Colin mentioned an official Fedora spec will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #55 from Rex Dieter ---
Thanks, and I'll use recent copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/chromium/build/375281/
for reference. note build fails on rawhide apparently due to some api
differences in rawhide's cu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Cline ---
Hi William!
I've updated the spec a little bit (based on what I learned in a different
review):
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-twine.spec
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327635
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1329341 (RDO-NEWTON)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353978
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353978
Bug ID: 1353978
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-colour - A cored, fixed,
documented and optimized version of `colors.js`
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279127
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-each
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278487
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526
--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith ---
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-tracejs/nodejs-tracejs.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-tracejs/nodejs-tracejs-0.1.8-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@cicku.me |tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
--- Comment #40 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Created attachment 1177694
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1177694&action=edit
Fix typo in comparison code
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #19 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #18)
> My username is tatyana
Ah, wasn't in the packager group yet, and I was apparently only looking within
that group. I've added you to the group and sponsored you now
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|zbys...@in.waw.pl |rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-zipstream
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1353887
--- Comment #1 from gil cattan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
--- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Sorry for the delay. I'm on vacation until Monday, so I won't look at this
until next week. Feel free to take it over. I'll try to finish the review next
week otherwise.
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #53 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
You can review off that SRPM. It's technically not a stable release of Chromium
(it's in their "beta" tag at the moment), but since 51 doesn't work right at
all with Fedora 24, I had to push somethi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #18 from tatyana ---
My username is tatyana
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #52 from Rex Dieter ---
spot, mind giving a fresh/updated spec/srpm urls?
I strongly suspect the links from comment #5 aren't current anymore.
This?
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-52.0.2743.60-1.fc24.src.rpm
zbyszek, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #17 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to tatyana from comment #14)
> I have an account in the Fedora Account System. Let me know if more actions
> on my part are required.
What is your FAS username? I'm struggling to find it at the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
--- Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> Unfortunately it's not yet good package.
>
> > %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> MUST be dropped
This isn't a "MUST" from my reading of things.
> > %clean
> > rm -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317282
--- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
I've also just sponsored you into the packager group. Remember, with great
power comes great responsibility.
You can continue your journey from this step:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317282
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352169
--- Comment #8 from François Kooman ---
The dependency status:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=miniupnpc
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=json-parser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #32 from Honza Horak ---
There is mariadb-connector-c package available, hopefully it can be used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065627
Kamil Dudka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352993
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-args-0.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-aeb9a60b9a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1353934
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327160
Michal Ruprich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrupr...@redhat.com
Assignee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347973
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917
Bug ID: 1353917
Summary: Review Request: gossip - Small and fast logging
provider for SLF4j
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347973
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1.5-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-47e441aac5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1.5-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-788747408e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1.5-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-839c78182b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348163
--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo ---
Now everything should be fine
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/rubygem-network-interface/rubygem-network-interface.spec
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/rubygem-network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ignate...@redhat.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343608
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ignate...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> lasem.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblasem-0.4.so.4.0.3
> exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
probably can be filled to upstream
> lasem.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/lasem/COPYING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343608
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
99 matches
Mail list logo
