https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsyna...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
It would be great to have python3-tornado on EPEL7, especially for python-pika
and running the dedicated tests for its adapter.
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5)
> This is waiting on a python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347898
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357176
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357176
Bug ID: 1357176
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-trim-newlines - Trim newlines
from the start and/or end of a string
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347898
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-randomatic/nodejs-randomatic.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-randomatic/nodejs-randomatic-1.1.5-3.fc24.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191062
--- Comment #3 from Eduardo Mayorga ---
Any update?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356118
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-yallist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347898
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346060
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1334112
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334112
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@mayorgalinux.com
Blo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356907
--- Comment #3 from Josh Stone ---
Nearly 6 hours later, armv7hl failed a few run-pass tests like so:
> error: linking with `cc` failed: exit code: 1
> note: "cc" "-Wl,--as-needed" "-Wl,-z,noexecstack" "-L"
> "/builddir/build/BUILD/rustc-1.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264164
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jruzi...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228115
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228118
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228106
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356625
--- Comment #14 from Alan Pevec ---
nitpick:
- changelog entries do not match Version
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--- Comment #5 from Orion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
cxsc-2.5.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-73a734e090
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/hibernate4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302909
--- Comment #7 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Updated to latest version (i.e. 8.1.6)
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/03ebf148dcd48fba531c813caf5185a273f04121/drupal8/drupal8.spec
SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6452
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6453
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jerr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357114
--- Comment #3 from tser...@redhat.com ---
Thanks, Ken.
I updated the spec file and source RPM in the URLs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/cxsc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
--- Comment #11 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> Someone have noticed of this change in the development list?
Yes, see the thread here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets?rd=Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356657
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #7)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> > Please, remove:
> > BuildRequires: gcc-c++
>
> Some people like to see gcc etc. explicitly listed, anyways fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356594
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14909734
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> maybe you can safety remove jquery
> from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/jQuery
> ln -fs %{_datadir}/javascript/jquery/[jquery VERSION]/jquery.min.js [BUN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356657
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/lxqt-wallet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356657
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Gro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
shibboleth-java-parent-v3-8-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5f9fda5b2f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357114
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
… And please add ChangeLog files:
%doc help-ChangeLog
%doc plugins-ChangeLog
%doc po-ChangeLog
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356657
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from gil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
Created attachment 1180246
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1180246&action=edit
licensecheck.txt
Please also poke upstream about sources without license header:
xviewer-1.0.4/cut-n-pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann ---
Note: License file license.page is not marked as %license
This is bogus, the mentioned *.page file is part of the user documentation, and
as such not to be considered as a license file for inclusion i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #7)
> Issues
> ==
> - Multiple licensing issues must be explained with a comment in the spec
> file.
> For some ideas on how this might be done, see
>
> https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the tex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356625
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|ignate...@redhat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357114
--- Comment #1 from tser...@redhat.com ---
This is my first package for Fedora, in case it wasn't clear :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318988
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #38 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357114
Bug ID: 1357114
Summary: Review Request: ceph-installer - An HTTP API for
deployment of Ceph clusters
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
report this notice
/*
* This routine is part of libc. We include it nevertheless,
* since the libc version has some security flaws.
*
* TODO: use canonicalize_file_name() when exist in glibc
*/
zuluC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357110
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
under public domain
zuluCrypt-5.0.0/zuluCrypt-gui/md5/md5.c
zuluCrypt-5.0.0/zuluCrypt-gui/md5/md5.h
from
http://openwall.info/wiki/people/solar/software/public-domain-source-code/md5
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
..and also Comment#1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #5)
> > [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
>
> What do you mean?
>
> Provides
>
> zulucrypt:
> application()
> appl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James ---
Issues
==
- Multiple licensing issues must be explained with a comment in the spec file.
For some ideas on how this might be done, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mult
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> for now i should comment the execution of the PATCH1, before run a build,
> untill
> hibernate-commons-annotations will not upgraded to 5.0.1
Yes, the build fail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357110
Bug ID: 1357110
Summary: Review Request: foma - Xerox-compatible finite-state
compiler
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: mediu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner ---
> [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
What do you mean?
Provides
zulucrypt:
application()
application(zuluCrypt.desktop)
application(zuluMount.desktop)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shibboleth-java-parent-v3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356657
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4)
> Please, remove:
> BuildRequires: gcc-c++
Some people like to see gcc etc. explicitly listed, anyways fixed.
> and change
>
> BuildRequires: libsecret-deve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> [?]: Latest version is packaged.
> => Can not validate version 8, where do you get it from?
https://git.shibboleth.net/view/?p=java-parent-project-v3.git;a=sum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner ---
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/raphgro/review/build/386324/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6444
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6445
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473
--- Comment #17 from Mario Blättermann ---
BTW, latest release is 1.5:
https://esite.ch/2016/04/small-bug-fix-release-diodon-1-5-0/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/WildFly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #3)
> How is this related to the existing hibernate package?
the packet is for Wildfly 10+, which use both 4.x and 5.x series.
and this become a compat package for pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
How is this related to the existing hibernate package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348160
--- Comment #7 from Francesco Frassinelli (frafra) ---
I would suggest to avoid env for Fedora packages for two reasons:
1. Fedora wiki suggests to use #!/usr/bin/ruby and #!/usr/bin/python
2. You don't want to get different behaviour/errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356907
--- Comment #2 from Josh Stone ---
FWIW, here's a scratch build trying an armv7hl bootstrap:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14908548
Even x86 took ~100min, so this might take a while. Note also that arm is Tier
2 by upstr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353343
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
qmc2-0.65-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354139
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nik4-1.6.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356118
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs-2.0.0-2.20160105git84313ca.el6 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-8a96a0e507
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348160
--- Comment #6 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Fabio Alessandro Locati from comment #5)
> @Germano: You _should_ probably rebase this package on 0.1.9
I know but I am waiting for Francesco Frassinelli comment about Ruby shebangs.
He cl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #20 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17)
> > > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs-2.0.0-2.20160105git84313ca.fc24 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7eb7fe9247
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs-2.0.0-2.20160105git84313ca.el7 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-4eaeb87c86
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs-2.0.0-2.20160105git84313ca.fc23 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a1dde1399d
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346060
--- Comment #1 from Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) ---
I am not sure if the above links will be up all the time so I am updating them
with my fedorapeople links
Spec URL :
https://dhanvi.fedorapeople.org/packages/pintail-asciidoc/pintail-asciidoc.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1180222
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1180222&action=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues (non blocking):
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs1-1.4.1-2.20160518git2e20c8d.fc23 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7018873b57
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs1-1.4.1-2.20160518git2e20c8d.el6 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a09a1e88d1
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs1-1.4.1-2.20160518git2e20c8d.fc24 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d62dbe2474
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs1-1.4.1-2.20160518git2e20c8d.el7 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6a6e50e9bf
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977
--- Comment #2 from Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) ---
The Spec URL is now not showing a 404, just to be sure I have added them else
where
Spec URL :
https://dhanvi.fedorapeople.org/packages/asciidoctor-mallard/asciidoctor-mallard.spec
SRPM UR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|clufter-0.57.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353598
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354118
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
protoparser-3.1.5-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c1e1198466
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
