https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356907
--- Comment #5 from Josh Stone ---
Even if it doesn't really cover *all* x86? We only have a bootstrap compiler
for i686 in particular. Although i586 is another known target at the moment,
upstream only builds std for it, and it's not even l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs-2.0.0-2.20160105git84313ca.el6 has been pushed to
the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs1-1.4.1-2.20160518git2e20c8d.el6 has been pushed to
the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356584
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354118
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356569
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356592
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349075
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356499
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||chromium
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177494
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||echevemas...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353988
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Complete list othe JDK files under GPLv2 with exceptions license:
./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentInitializationException.java
./main/src/com/sun/tools/attach/AgentLoadException.java
./main/src/com/sun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1180493
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1180493&action=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alwa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> > you must add: Provides: bundled(objectweb-asm) = 5.0.3
> > maybe 5.0.3 is not the correct asm release but for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #1)
> you must add: Provides: bundled(objectweb-asm) = 5.0.3
> maybe 5.0.3 is not the correct asm release but for me is not a problem
Can we unbundle? I based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
you must add: Provides: bundled(objectweb-asm) = 5.0.3
maybe 5.0.3 is not the correct asm release but for me is not a problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #2)
> Review swap with bug #1357204?
sure, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
Review swap with bug #1357204?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Alias
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Bug ID: 1357204
Summary: Review Request: jmockit - Java toolkit for
unit/integration testing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357110
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334112
Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhanvi...@gmail.com
--- Co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356907
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
in Exclusive arch replace i686 with %{ix86}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
Forwarding an e-mail I got from upstream:
Greetings from founder and current maintainer of zuluCrypt.
I usually google "zuluCrypt" to see what is out there and google led
me to your effort of packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interest in a review swap with bug #1346457?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
--- Comment #1
33 matches
Mail list logo
