https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355871
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-clint-0.5.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pytoml-0.1.10-2.gitd883c7c.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355871
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-clint-0.5.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski ---
Ah, looks like you aren't going to be able to do much with the spec on Fedora
I'm afraid.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #2)
> Because this is for EPEL7 and it builds python34-scipy there.
Okay; but why %{python3_pkgversion} is not working on mock ?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
Because this is for EPEL7 and it builds python34-scipy there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
--- Comment #12 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf ---
(In reply to David Lehman from comment #11)
> (In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #10)
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Just a question, if this package is for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
The package is already named as python3-scipy.
Why this definition:
%package -n python%{python3_pkgversion}-scipy
?
$ fedora-review -m epel-7-x86_64 -rn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
gap-pkg-float-0.7.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-49d0bb5c71
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115
--- Comment #26 from jeremy.ferga...@gmail.com ---
I got the Todos added into the most recent version of the spec file. Swift is
a complicated packaging scenario and I believe that it conforms to the Fedora
Packaging Guidelines.
The one fly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359315
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359315
Bug ID: 1359315
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-array-find-index - ES2015
`Array#findIndex()` ponyfill
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358692
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-mvo5-uboot-go-0-0.1.git361f6eb.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-emojione-2.2.6-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358692
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Created attachment 1182935
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1182935=edit
log from failed build in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock
(compressing to pass the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355871
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-clint-0.5.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
gossip-2.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355871
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pytoml-0.1.10-2.gitd883c7c.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354139
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352065
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
gst-transcoder-1.8.1-1.fc24, pitivi-0.96-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora
24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/hypre
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354139
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nik4-1.6.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Test-Roo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gap-pkg-float
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
--- Comment #28 from Dave Love ---
Thanks. Yes, I should have commented on the patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328
--- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani ---
Mhh, looks like bogus metadata, none of the perl sources actually use any of
those modules AFAICS.
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani ---
> > Approved, only two remarks:
> >
> > - You could use %make_build instead of make %{?_smp_mflags}
>
> Is that a new macro? I don't recall seeing it before.
Newish [1], should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1)
> Approved, only two remarks:
>
> - You could use %make_build instead of make %{?_smp_mflags}
Is that a new macro? I don't recall seeing it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
I'm not very familiar with perl packaging, so forgive me if this is a stupid
question. According to META.yml, perl(bareword::filehandles), perl(indirect),
and perl(multidimensional)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359116
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #85 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/opa-fmgui
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352993
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-args-0.1.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
nitroshare-0.3.2-9.fc24, qhttpengine-0.1.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora
24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359116
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359116
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359246
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359244
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1359246
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359246
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1359244, 1359241
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359241
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1359246
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359246
Bug ID: 1359246
Summary: Review Request: netty5 - An asynchronous event-driven
network application framework and tools for Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359116
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359244
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359244
Bug ID: 1359244
Summary: Review Request: hpack - Header Compression for HTTP/2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359241
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359234
--- Comment #1 from Christos Triantafyllidis
---
Koji scratch builds:
- rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14979889
- f24:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359241
Bug ID: 1359241
Summary: Review Request: lzma-java - LZMA library for Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358940
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
--- Comment #84 from Rick Tierney ---
Hi Michal:
It wasn't clear what URL to put in that field so I put the wrong value there; I
will try again! Thanks!
Rick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359234
Bug ID: 1359234
Summary: Review Request: auter - Prepare and apply updates
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176595
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224
Jun Aruga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358940
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359224
Bug ID: 1359224
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-turbolinks-source - Turbolinks
JavaScript assets
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358937
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Michal Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358937
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358959
--- Comment #4 from Jonas Danielsson ---
I have updated the SPEC file. And I also released a v2 of the application.
So the new version is 2, and the new SRPM is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359092
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-gopkg-go-check-check
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352042
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Specio
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358248
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-http-client
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
--- Comment #11 from David Lehman ---
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #10)
> Hi David,
>
> Just a question, if this package is for the python2 version, do you still
> need the below line?
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359092
--- Comment #3 from Zygmunt Krynicki ---
Thanks, noted on the %changelog, will do as suggested.
Thank you
ZK
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247243
--- Comment #7 from Paul Roubekas ---
Use of http will not fix the "2 years old code with unfixed CVE, performance
and severe functional issues. "
I stand by my first comment. mod_cluster needs updated for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349604
Ondřej Lysoněk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186
Rick Tierney changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-emojione-2.2.6-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-38e4c90532
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-emojione-2.2.6-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-afde6e2f05
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700
--- Comment #20 from fujiwara ---
(In reply to fujiwara from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #15)
> > Can emoji.json be subpackaged so other packages can use it?
>
> Why? Even though emoji.json is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352837
--- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #5)
> Unless there was some change in guidelines, it is blocker to pack bundled
> libraries. I would recommend you to check with java-maint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352837
--- Comment #5 from jiri vanek ---
Unless there was some change in guidelines, it is blocker to pack bundled
libraries. I would recommend you to check with java-maint group.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350700
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-emojione-2.2.6-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-afde6e2f05
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359092
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352042
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359110
--- Comment #2 from leigh scott ---
The scriptlets need fixing (missing paths).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets?rd=Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359116
Bug ID: 1359116
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-m2e-maven-dependency-plugin -
M2E maven-dependency-plugin connector
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359110
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build on Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14978999
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359110
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359110
Bug ID: 1359110
Summary: Review Request: xreader - Simple document viewer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247243
--- Comment #6 from Jean-frederic Clere ---
Actually mod_cluster will use http if you don't configure an AJP connector in
tomcat (AKA comment it from the default server.xml)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352837
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> > Note that not all bundled jars are available in repos. I don't know how
> > properly make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349604
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352837
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jva...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349604
Ondřej Lysoněk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(olysonek@redhat.c
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo