https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356907
--- Comment #8 from Josh Stone ---
New files:
https://fedorapeople.org/~jistone/review/rust/v2/rust.spec
https://fedorapeople.org/~jistone/review/rust/v2/rust-1.10.0-2.fc26.src.rpm
I updated the things I agreed to above.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310368
--- Comment #5 from Dennis Chen ---
> leave it as a placeholder and I will close it out when I resubmit properly.
This would be great. Looking forward to having Jekyll on Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359794
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359794
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
python-marrow-util-1.2.3-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ee99ebdad6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
gap-pkg-scscp-2.1.4-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-39819ec5e6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177494
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177494
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334112
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340473
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256057
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen ---
rpmbuild fails (due to %license): please check the "cblrpm diff" output.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
Douglas Schilling Landgraf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #9 from Dan Williams ---
I am unable to build this package due to missing ctemplate in Rawhide.
ctemplate package only exists in Fedora 23, but has been marked as
retired/orphaned for all Fedora releases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: NextCloud - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333933
--- Comment #8 from Namratha Kothapalli ---
Latest code and specs -
Spec URL:
https://github.com/01org/ixpdimm_sw/releases/download/v01.00.00.2104/ixpdimm_sw.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
Bug ID: 1360482
Summary: Review Request: NextCloud - a private, secure way to
share and access files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
--- Comment #13 from David Lehman ---
New spec and SRPM available:
SRPM:
https://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/python-blivet1/python-blivet1-1.20.3-2.fc25.src.rpm
SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334112
--- Comment #5 from William Moreno ---
From build log in corp:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Ay244b
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd pintail-1e00238e3446b199d043742b56d092e7b65aca72
+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334112
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
--- Comment #38 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Harald Hoyer from comment #36)
> Note: installing systemd afterwards in a separate rpm transaction does not
> produce the same result.
What about the proposal in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
--- Comment #37 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
Policy guideline discussion: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/644
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238385
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani ---
Mh sorry managed to upload a wrong SRPM, re-uploaded the correct one.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15026089
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.9.1-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-81dff2c066
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.9.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-353d77a339
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.9.1-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-de1aca249f
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405
--- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Okay. I _think_ things are working again.
New SRPM:
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-native_client-52.0.2743.82-1.20160725git7d72623.fc24.src.rpm
New SPEC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
Janet Morgan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353000
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1359761
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353001
Athmane Madjoudj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1359761
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #11 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> Seem vailable in this sub folders:
> keepkey/src/main/keepkey-common/protob/
> ... or no? are not the same?
They are different.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
--- Comment #18 from Siddharth Sharma ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #17)
> re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion:
> ... this helps:
> # fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356907
--- Comment #7 from Josh Stone ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #6)
> * License file FiraSans-LICENSE.txt is not marked as %license
OK, will change.
> * Package has .a files
Yes, libcompiler-rt.a, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354545
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #6)
> Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15024957
> → success
>
> Waiting for dependency to arrive on my rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
--- Comment #9 from Jan Pokorný ---
re [comment 1]:
0.56.3 + 0.57.0:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-July/003423.html
(for 0.56.3, there's a caveat:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276834
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: please resubmit in rpms
namespace
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15024957
→ success
Waiting for dependency to arrive on my rawhide mirror (using fastestmirror).
ERROR: Command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
--- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter ---
re-reading, looks like my item 12 was missing the actual spec suggestion:
... this helps:
# fix/workaround hard-coded rpaths
sed -i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
--- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter ---
Looks good, all the blocker items mentioned previously were addressed.
Remaining items to consider:
5. SHOULD document why these compiler flags are needed in a .spec comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238385
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
FTBFS
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15024939
+ MINGW32_CMAKE_ARGS='
-DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360199
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360199
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
errata-xmlrpc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner ---
License discussion continued.
Why license CC-BY-SA for the doc subpackage? I can not validate because I don't
find any file from upstream that says so.
Still not fixed as in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310294
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
--- Comment #50 from Orion Poplawski ---
Comment on attachment 1184318
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1184318
Replace readdir_r with readdir and catch errno
Seems reasonable to me.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--- Comment #4 from José Matos ---
Ping...
I am updating the package to the latest version that is available at
updates-testing for F24:
Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344415
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
--- Comment #31 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com ---
Hi Neil,
What info is being requested from me at this point? So you marked it approved,
now am I waiting to get a sponsor? Does the FE_NEEDSPONSOR in the blocks
section accomplish that or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
Forgot, sorry:
Unknown or generated
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/jpegint-8a.h
xviewer-1.0.4/jpegutils/transupp-8a.h
These two files have IJG license, see README.8a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276834
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360199
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354398
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-golang-time
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354378
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-urfave-cli
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354375
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-gengo-grpc-gateway
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-onelogin-php-saml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360199
--- Comment #9 from Zygmunt Krynicki ---
I've updated packaging to reflect this discussion. I hope I didn't miss
anything.
The spec and SRPM file is at the same location as before.
You can have a detailed view of the changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360394
Bug ID: 1360394
Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-watch - Local continuous
test runner with pytest and watchdog
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276834
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356597
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15024434
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360365
Bug ID: 1360365
Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-mock - Thin-wrapper
around the mock package for easier use with py.test
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356594
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356594
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
shibboleth-java-support-7.1.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6eed6bdf7
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #8)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> > Please use: %mvn_build -f -- -Pupdate-protobuf
> > for re-generate java code
>
> The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354398
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354378
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #9 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #2)
> hi
> if you have time, can you take this
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359797 ?
> thanks in advance
I will review it in my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #8 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> Please use: %mvn_build -f -- -Pupdate-protobuf
> for re-generate java code
The protobuf source files are git submodules and are not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354375
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gap-pkg-scscp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360274
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/qt5-qtvirtualkeyboard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343063
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/artemis
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356594
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/shibboleth-java-support
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359804
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-mvo5-goconfigparser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354545
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-actioncable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359794
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-marrow-util
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360274
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343063
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6636
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6637
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356594
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6634
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/6635
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343063
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1184267
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1184267=edit
licensecheck.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360274
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356594
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Another trick, for run test suite (if possible):
%pom_change_dep org.easytesting:fest-assert-core org.assertj:assertj-core:2.0.0
find ./ -name "*.java" -exec sed -i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> Please use: %mvn_build -f -- -Pupdate-protobuf
> for re-generate java code
you should change in maven-antrun-plugin configuration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Please use: %mvn_build -f -- -Pupdate-protobuf
for re-generate java code
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360292
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
if you have time, can you take this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359797 ?
thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo