https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366741
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Štěpán Smetana from comment #2)
> Seems ok: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/414117/
Please paste it here.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366881
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
ispc-1.9.1-7.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ee40851f3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366881
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
ispc-1.9.1-7.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-01fee06612
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366881
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121425
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121425
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
lazygal-0.8.8-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d507f45a1f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366741
Štěpán Smetana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #2 from Štěpán Smet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366741
Štěpán Smetana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357724
--- Comment #14 from Susi Lehtola ---
Yeah, so the default ATLAS package on x86_64 is non-SSE3, but there's a SSE3
variant available, as well.
Packaging both within the same srpm is not allowed per the packaging
guidelines, as there needs to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033
--- Comment #28 from Muayyad Alsadi ---
here
https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init/pull/111#issuecomment-241953813
the upstream indicated that we can't use "make test" because it uses pip which
needs external network.
the upstream suggested add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370291
Pradeep Kilambi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1329341 (RDO-NEWTON)
Referenced Bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370291
Bug ID: 1370291
Summary: Review Request: python-tenacity - Tenacity is a
general purpose retrying python library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368626
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349578
--- Comment #3 from Pradeep Kilambi ---
rebased to 0.12.0
Spec URL: https://pkilambi.fedorapeople.org/python-pifpaf/python-pifpaf.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pkilambi.fedorapeople.org/python-pifpaf/python-pifpaf-0.12.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368626
Štěpán Smetana changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssmet...@redhat.com
Flags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366838
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366835
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #80 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366837
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870
--- Comment #33 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com ---
Just now seen this. I have been out for a couple weeks. My fedora user name is
ddalessa.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #3)
> I think package name is correct. Also, I think there is no specific
> guidelines that says if a package contains some binary/script that uses its
> own python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I think package name is correct. Also, I think there is no specific guidelines
that says if a package contains some binary/script that uses its own python
library then name it with python prefix. Correct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239
Bug ID: 1370239
Summary: Review Request: ansible-tower-cli - A CLI tool for
Ansible Tower
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: med
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970427
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|177841 (FE-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970427
Bug 970427 depends on bug 970423, which changed state.
Bug 970423 Summary: Review Request: mingw-libsndfile - Library for reading and
writing sound files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970423
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970423
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|177841 (FE-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370153
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1348005
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1348005
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370158
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1348005
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348005
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1370135, 1370138, 1370153,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370135
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1348005
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370138
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1348005
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359234
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
auter-0.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329838
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen ---
I would suggest shortening the Summary though:
--- ghc-uglymemo.spec~2016-04-23 20:20:10.0 +0200
+++ ghc-uglymemo.spec2016-08-25 18:06:55.547281927 +0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name: g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329838
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Je
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329838
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356625
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|needinfo?(karlt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343814
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
Flags|fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343814
--- Comment #14 from Dusty Mabe ---
I have reviewed the following packages:
python-blowfish - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361632
python-isort - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361687
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #5 from MartinKG ---
@Itamar could you please finish the review ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364723
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327218
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364723
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fuzzyfinder-1.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359234
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
auter-0.7-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327218
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
libvterm-0-0.1.bzr681.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=122
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-prov-1.4.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libtermkey-0.18-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349604
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291008
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=122
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349604
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-tqdm-4.8.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327198
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291008
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
tipl-0-0.2.git6a59380.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363923
Bug 1363923 depends on bug 1363921, which changed state.
Bug 1363921 Summary: Review Request: protobuf-java-format - Serialization and
de-serialization of different formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363921
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363921
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
protobuf-java-format-1.4-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363921
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343814
--- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #10)
> (In reply to Randy Barlow from comment #9)
> > Hey Dusty! The next step is for you to get sponsored. You should find a
> > sponsor and work with them to get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #19 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> Is this patch for epel6 only?
It's not relevant for epel6 because that doesn't have a recent enough cgns
(which needs to be conditionalized out).
> With cgns,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361632
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks for taking a look! If you have a review and are in need of a sponsor,
let me know and I can take a look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364194
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pintail
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333928
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #12)
>
> I'd forgotten that I had a more recent cgns installed; the epel6
> version won't work, and needs to be conditionalized out. I also found
> it needed a patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openhft-affinity.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/openhft-affinity-3.0.6-1.fc24.src.rpm
- disable JNI library on ARM arch
https://github.com/OpenHFT/Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366837
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366838
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366835
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331952
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370158
Bug ID: 1370158
Summary: rubygem-celluloid-supervision - Celluloid Supervision
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1903e53093
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #78 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0a6d8b86c1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #77 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f9a7c78c30
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370153
Bug ID: 1370153
Summary: rubygem-celluloid-pool - An implementation of an actor
pool, based on the Celluloid concurrent object
framework
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370138
Bug ID: 1370138
Summary: rubygem-celluloid-fsm - Celluloid Finite State
Machines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370135
Bug ID: 1370135
Summary: rubygem-celluloid-extras - Celluloid expansion,
testing, and example classes
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366838
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
gs-collections-5.1.0-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-72f0ed9593
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366838
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366835
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366835
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
reactive-streams-1.0.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8e0b89c55
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370128
Martin Bříza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1357424
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057909
Martin Bříza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1357424
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370128
Bug ID: 1370128
Summary: Review Request: mingw-mediawriter - Fedora Media
Writer for Windows
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366837
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366837
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
webjars-locator-0.32-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ced98877d4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366713
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
@ Claudio maybe you should set the fields: "Assigned to" and "Status"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366713
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096
--- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo ---
I have first packaged rubygem-essentials without having enforced the
BuildRequires rubygem-timers version. The build went fine, then I found out
that I have missed to add the rubygem-timers version enfo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1253999
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334611
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cvss-1.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369558
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-smartcols-0.1.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367971
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334611
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cvss-1.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346249
--- Comment #6 from Jiri Kulda ---
Ok thanks for explanation. Due to this I'm putting ack for this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096
Bug ID: 1370096
Summary: rubygem-celluloid-essentials - Internally used tools,
and superstructural dependencies of Celluloid
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357724
--- Comment #13 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #12)
> What do you mean? Is ATLAS compiled as SSE3-only on x86_64?
# repoquery atlas-\*
atlas-0:3.8.4-2.el6.i686
atlas-0:3.8.4-2.el6.x86_64
atlas-3dnow-0:3.8.4-2.el6.i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057909
--- Comment #6 from Martin Bříza ---
Updated Spec URL: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/413734/47211866/
Updated SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/przemal/mingw-qt5-qtquickcontrols/fedora-24-x86_64/00428684-mingw-qt5-qtqu
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
