https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00903-4.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
lasem-0.4.3-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
lasem-0.4.3-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227972
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367598
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
gap-pkg-guava-3.13.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
fmt-3.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369374
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python2-faulthandler-2.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350143
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
fmt-3.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
clatd-1.4-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033
--- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dumb-init
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369374
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python2-faulthandler-2.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370874
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gap-pkg-automata
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371635
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366839
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
@Ben, need something else to finish the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033
--- Comment #35 from Muayyad Alsadi ---
I was able to produce an rpm with %check that validates the build
1. after applying the merged upstream patch (not included in 1.1.3 release)
2. adding the following BR (to make it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348997
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
python-backports-shutil_get_terminal_size-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the
Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360365
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033
--- Comment #34 from Muayyad Alsadi ---
@dmitrij here is the latest spec url (which you can wget/curl)
curl -L
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033
--- Comment #33 from Muayyad Alsadi ---
the tests can be done on both python2 or python3
for python2 making BR python-mock and python-test would work for both fedora
and EPEL
but for python3 in fedora they are called
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/wildfly-arquillian.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/wildfly-arquillian-1.0.2-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Issues
> ==
> 1. The spec file URL in the bug differs from the spec file inside the srpm.
>See the diff below.
Done
> 2. Some files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #4)
> the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because
> "%configure" adds an extra flag "-Werror" to CFLAGS, which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #4 from yunying@intel.com ---
the configure error "cannot run C compiled programs" is there, seems because
"%configure" adds an extra flag "-Werror" to CFLAGS, which turns some config
warnings to errors. With "./configure",
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349578
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1371845
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
BTW, for the EPEL7, you probably want to follow these guidelines [1], which are
referenced on the top of regular Fedora packaging guidelines.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371810
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||python-iowait
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371810
Bug ID: 1371810
Summary: Review Request: python-iowait - Platform-independent
module for I/O completion events
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366713
--- Comment #13 from Timotheus Pokorra ---
@Raphael, I have requested commit rights on those 3 packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371627
--- Comment #10 from jfch ---
implemented %license now
release is 5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371627
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to jfch from comment #7)
> Almost all done but %license tag causes local compilation fail.
> Looking at other rawhide srpms I didn't see it anywhere.
$ find -type f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371627
--- Comment #9 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> If the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file,
> then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be
> included in %license.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371627
--- Comment #7 from jfch ---
Almost all done but %license tag causes local compilation fail.
Looking at other rawhide srpms I didn't see it anywhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358215
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jchaloup@redhat.c |
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo