https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #31 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to lo1 from comment #30)
> Changelog needs to be updated every time you make changes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/
> Guidelines#Changelogs
>
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
As the other patches are not numbered, I don't think so.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279093
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Mailänder ---
https://pkgs.org/fedora-rawhide/fedora-i386/smuxi-engine-1.0.5-1.fc25.i686.rpm.html
already bundles it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Michael Hampton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ttome...@redhat.com
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
l...@us.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@us.ibm.com
--- Comment #30 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pycodestyle-2.0.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Michael Hampton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|er...@ioerror.us
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Michael Hampton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #29 from yunying@intel.com ---
Fixed a typo in ExcludeArch list.
Updated SPEC:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-tss.spec
Updated SRPMS:
https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-tss-1.0-0.1.b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
d. johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Nick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Nick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999
--- Comment #2 from d. johnson ---
Approved after two minor items:
* Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
The .spec is corre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444
--- Comment #2 from d. johnson ---
Approved after two minor items:
* Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
The .spec is corre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252
Bug 1377252 depends on bug 1377228, which changed state.
Bug 1377228 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings - Fail if
tests warn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377228
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377228
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354113
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374035
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
pimd-2.3.2-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348005
Bug 1348005 depends on bug 1348202, which changed state.
Bug 1348202 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348206
Bug 1348206 depends on bug 1348202, which changed state.
Bug 1348202 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348005
Bug 1348005 depends on bug 1348162, which changed state.
Bug 1348162 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-net-dns - Pure Ruby DNS library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348162
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348162
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279093
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|punto...@libero.it |
Assignee|punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
jitterentropy-rngd-1.0.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #10 from Christoph Junghans ---
I found another overlinking issue with fedora-review.
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junghans/fedora-review/master/exodusii/exodusii.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/junghans/fedora-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Correct urls:
Spec URL: https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/odoo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/odoo-9.0c.20160923-0.1.fc26.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445
Markus S. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kamika...@web.de
--- Comment #10 from Mar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gasnet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373487
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #6)
> any movement here folks?
Thanks for the ping.
Any help with other depending packages of the python notebook is welcome.
%changelog
- update to 4.5.0
- Fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327981
Bug 1327981 depends on bug 1327989, which changed state.
Bug 1327989 Summary: Review Request: python-jupyter-client - Jupyter protocol
implementation and client libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
What|R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979
Bug 1327979 depends on bug 1327989, which changed state.
Bug 1327989 Summary: Review Request: python-jupyter-client - Jupyter protocol
implementation and client libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
What|R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327989
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379460
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jchal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #34 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #30)
> I would say that in using Exclude vs. ExclusiveArch we should apply some
> reasoning - if it is positively known that the package does not work on
> anything e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379460
Bug ID: 1379460
Summary: Review Request: kompose - Tool to move from
`docker-compose` to Kubernetes
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #3 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> Could you please commit (or PR) it into the GH repo?
> https://github.com/fedora-python/python26
>
> Thanks
Is it required for this package to reserve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Hi,
I was travelling the last few days, I couldn't participate in the conversation.
I'm fine with adding a Recommend. This package is tiny, so this shouldn't be an
issue. I'll add it on sys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #9 from MartinKG ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/lollypop.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/lollypop-0.9.205-1.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Sep 26 2016 Martin Gansser - 0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Could you please commit (or PR) it into the GH repo?
https://github.com/fedora-python/python26
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel mod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #33 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #29)
> From Fedora packaging guideline, ExcludeArch is preferred than
> ExclusiveArch, see "ExcludeArch & ExclusiveArch" part @
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Arch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #32 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Updated Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2.spec
Updated SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2-713-6.fc24.src.rpm
Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1581
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
--- Comment #8 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #7)
> Issues:
>
> [?]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
> Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`";
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #31 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~honclo/tss2-713-5.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
TSS2 is a user space Trusted Computing Group's Software Stack (TSS)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1379432 (odoo)
Referenced B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1379421 (python-psycogreen)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379432
Bug ID: 1379432
Summary: Review Request: odoo - Suite of web based open source
business apps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372123
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Review |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||python-psycogreen
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421
Bug ID: 1379421
Summary: Review Request: Review Request: python-psycogreen -
Psycopg2 integration with co-routine libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cstra...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abdel.g.martine...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769487
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cstra...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
--- Comment #1 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
On koji the build finishes successfully for f23, while this is not the case for
copr f23 chroots.
The issue here are zombie processes left behind due to a test case in
test_thread.py, so there is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Bug ID: 1379393
Summary: Review Request: pavucontrol-qt - Qt port of volume
control pavucontrol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #17 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
(In reply to Jared Smith from comment #16)
> 3) It's not a huge deal, but rpmlint is complaining that the bash completion
> file isn't marked as %config(noreplace) instead of just %config. Have you
> tho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376450
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libdvbpsi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
--- Comment #16 from Jared Smith ---
This package is getting closer to being ready for approval. The remaining
outstanding items are:
1) This package fails to install, because of the missing dependency on
libphutil.
2) The spec file should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #12 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
> I've never got a 100% clear answer. (Perhaps there is none :-)
I can share the dirty secrets of varnish ABI rules, but let's do that in a
dedicated ticket against the varnish package when I have so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ignate...@redhat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362490
--- Comment #26 from Jared Smith ---
(In reply to Tim Flink from comment #25)
> > MIT/X11 (BSD like)
> > --
> > libphutil-8f8e02d47569dce5f035383d8bcbf7a08481e839/externals/jsonlint/LICENSE
>
> Why couldn't this be distributed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/ecc-25519-java.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/ecc-25519-java-1.0.3-1.fc24.src.rpm
- update to 1.0.3
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
maybe you should update license field, if mpeg/psi/psi.h is under MIT (style)
license
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #11 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #10)
> I'm certainly against the varnish ABI dependency, I will submit a patch as
> you requested. In the mean time please remove:
>
> Requires: varnisha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376436
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/bitstream-1.1-2.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #10 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
I'm certainly against the varnish ABI dependency, I will submit a patch as you
requested. In the mean time please remove:
Requires: varnishabi-5.0
For the virtual provides, I would add the %{rel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Tomas Sykora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tosyk...@redhat.com
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Tomas Sykora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Radovan Sroka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tosyk...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Bug 1290342 depends on bug 1290339, which changed state.
Bug 1290339 Summary: Review Request: curve25519-java - Implementation of
Curve25519 in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290339
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Bug 1290342 depends on bug 1290337, which changed state.
Bug 1290337 Summary: Review Request: ed25519-java - Implementation of EdDSA
(Ed25519) in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #9 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
(In reply to Ingvar Hagelund from comment #8)
> Something like this?
>
> https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules.spec
> https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules-0.9.2-0.1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #8 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
Something like this?
https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules.spec
https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/varnish/varnish-modules-0.9.2-0.1.20160924gitdaa4f1d.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317887
Tomas Sykora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tosyk...@redhat.com
Assignee|n
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
