https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
cl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #41 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
Fedora Account System Username: honclo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220103
--- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro ---
ping
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #40 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #37)
> Please remove the %defattr(0644,root,root,-) in the -devel subpackage, this
> is causing:
>
> tss2-devel.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/tss2-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-docker-pycreds-0.2.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc24, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc24, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc23, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc23, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc23 has
been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
l...@us.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||238953
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
l...@us.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||485231
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-asciitree-0.3.3-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-pcaprub-0.12.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298131
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Update to 0.33.0
Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-storage/python-azure-storage.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-storage/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
Bug ID: 1382152
Summary: Review Request: orpie - scientific calculator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedorapr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #1 from Jared Wallace ---
Another side note: packaging guidelines require a bug to be filed when the
package in question does not build on a particular architecture. This will not
build on armv7hl but I don't see how to file a bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/acme-tiny
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libglvnd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #23 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Oh my. I didn't see that the package was approved! I'll address those nits
and get it out there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381303
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381307
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
gomtree-0-0.2.git8c6b32c.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
Comments and issues:
* A simpler way to do the %install phase is to simply re-order it so that
%py2_install occurs first, then %py3_install next. That should properly
overwrite /usr/bin/distro. After all, th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029
--- Comment #4 from Ranjan Maitra ---
New files posted:
Spec URL: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/Fedora/more-itertools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~maitra/Fedora/python-more-itertools-2.2-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642
--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Arguably, the "best" approach would be to use a standard and recognized font
license, like the SIL OFL, but I imagine that is unlikely to occur. This hybrid
license is inconsistent, and the text does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218
--- Comment #18 from Pádraig Brady ---
I wasn't sure how supported this was, or if it might be temporary in nature,
with the functionality being added to the main zstd util? I'll ask upstream...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #39 from l...@us.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #38)
> I have also sponsored you into Fedora packager group.
Thank you very much for your reviews and willingness to sponsor me into the
Feodra packager group! I'll
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #22 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Tuple unpacking in parameter lists is gone in python3. But 2to3 takes care of
the translation. Unfortunately it seems you need a separate build dirs for the
two versions. It seem easiest to j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
Pravin Satpute changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Bug 1159091 depends on bug 1279087, which changed state.
Bug 1279087 Summary: Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType
bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
What|Removed |Adde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
Pravin Satpute changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psatp...@redhat.com
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý ---
> I do intend to try to package the rest of OBS, and I've seen Josef's thesis
> before. I've addressed the Net::RabbitMQ issue before OBS 2.7 was
> released[1], so that unblocks the OBS backend. I'm goi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1363923
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework4.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework4-4.1.9-1.fc24.src.rpm
- fix for CVE-2016-5007, see https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2016-5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-distro/python-distro.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/python-distro/python-distro-1.0.0-5.fc24.src.rpm
I am now generating just pyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218
Christian Kujau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||li...@nerdbynature.de
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2)
> * You are hard-requiring /bin/lsb_release, which upstream says is not
> necessary. Please downgrade it to Recommends, as the lsb package has a large
> web of dep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-compendium
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264660
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch ---
You don't specify runtime dependency on any of GraphicsMagick or ImageMagick.
Shouldn't you choose one? Which is preferred? Shouldn't you use "Recommends" to
make this working out of the box?
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-core
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #7 from Michael Simace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
as for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193#c14 "Lifting
FE-Legal"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264656
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> BTW how are you going address the bundling?
You still have not addressed this concern ^^. If you are going to keep the
bundled library, then you should at minimum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, add Richard Fontana email as an attachment
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo ---
Blocker:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
Waiting for Fedora Legal r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from gil catt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Blocker:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
Waiting for Fedora Legal re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #38 from Tomas Mraz ---
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
--- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo ---
Update to newer Git version.
Spec URL: https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libvmi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libvmi-0.11.0-1.20161003git5ad492c.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #37 from Toma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #25 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #24)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #23)
> > caffeine replace
> > com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap:concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru
> > (see https://github
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-asciitree
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378740
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pytest-faulthandler
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek ---
Removed the alias, because it conflicts with felix and breaks stuff.
Spec URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core.spec
SRPM URL: https://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/osgi-core-6.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Oh, also, your description in the python3 subpackage says it's the python 2
version, which it obviously is not.
You may choose to wrap the common description in a macro and reuse it for the
description secti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029
--- Comment #2 from Ranjan Maitra ---
I am having a problem with the new SPEC file. It does not compile. Here is the
error I get.
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/more.py", line 162
min_or_max = partial(max if reverse else min, key=lambda (a, b)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec
SRPM URL:
http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.2.999-2.git14f6283.fc24.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Add Correct License: MIT
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
Bug 1357064 depends on bug 1381197, which changed state.
Bug 1381197 Summary: Please build a package for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381197
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #17)
> Can you reply the comment about license in comment #c11?
Thx for your reply.
I think I got your comment wrong and assumed AX_PTHRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
--- Comment #18 from leigh scott ---
Debian used BSD-3-clause license for libglvnd
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-nvidia/libglvnd.git/tree/debian/copyright
To me the license looks like it should be MIT and BSD
https://paste.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #24 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #23)
> caffeine replace
> com.googlecode.concurrentlinkedhashmap:concurrentlinkedhashmap-lru
> (see https://github.com/ben-manes/concurrentlinkedhashmap/issues/48),
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
* Naming is correct.
* License is correct.
* Python 2 and Python 3 subpackages are being correctly generated for Fedora.
However, I see a few issues:
* Starting with Fedora 23, the default implementation of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
Bug ID: 1381935
Summary: Review Request: python-distro - Linux Distribution - a
Linux OS platform information API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #1)
> If you intend to package rest of OBS you may check chapter 5 from
> http://is.muni.cz/th/325243/fi_m/thesis.pdf
I do intend to try to package the rest of OBS, a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
I got the license tags from the SUSE spec[1] and translated it to our short
tags. Since SUSE is the upstream and they have a spec, I trust that the tag
information is correct.
[1]:
https://build.opensuse.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380420
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700
--- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter ---
I would prefer the alias remain
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144865
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114215
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Reopened
Status|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1271193
Referenced Bugs:
https://
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
