https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #3 from Brad Hubbard ---
Sorry this took so long Josef.
Renamed package.
Removed Group tag.
Removed features from description.
Have no experience with translation to Chinese so would probably not get it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Shawn Starr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #16 from Shawn Starr ---
I will do review since I want this font already. Expect a review for tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #41 from yunying@intel.com ---
Hi everyone, this is my first package, and after some reviews and updates, it
has been quiet for some days. Could someone kindly help with further review,
approve and sponsor? Thanks in advance.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875
Bug ID: 1382875
Summary: Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector
(psad) watches for suspect traffic
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1)
> > License:Apache-2.0
> ASL 2.0
Fixed.
>
> > Group: Productivity/Networking/Other
> > Group:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502
--- Comment #9 from Christian Dersch ---
(In reply to cyril from comment #7)
>
> So, I think that the best way is to try to review the package in rpm fusion
> and to remove the 0.8 version from Fedora. Indeed, this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382859
Bug ID: 1382859
Summary: Review Request: kelbt - Backtracking LR Parsing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382850
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||libtoml
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382859
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1382861
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382859
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||kelbt
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502
--- Comment #8 from cyril ---
I'm sorry for that by the way, but i did not know that before asking for the
package review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382810
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502
--- Comment #7 from cyril ---
(In reply to Christian Dersch from comment #6)
> Well, according to
> http://free-astro.org/index.php/Siril:install#Dependencies ffms2 is
> optional?
>
> I can do the rework and update for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382850
Bug ID: 1382850
Summary: Review Request: libtoml - Fast C parser using Ragel to
generate the state machine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502
--- Comment #6 from Christian Dersch ---
Well, according to http://free-astro.org/index.php/Siril:install#Dependencies
ffms2 is optional?
I can do the rework and update for Fedora, but only without problematic stuff.
In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502
--- Comment #5 from cyril ---
(In reply to Christian Dersch from comment #4)
> Seems to be possible to build without ffms2 => I'll investigate for an update
Too late, I'll ask to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381741
--- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch ---
Thank you :) I will fix the licensing breakdown and investigate the font
unbundling.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381735
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381516
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381735
--- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch ---
Indeed, I forgot to add the special licenses of two files.. Added now, thank
you :)
Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/python-astroscrappy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381516
--- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch ---
Thank you, indeed I have overseen the astropy_helpers licensing...
Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/python-reproject.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382813
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382797
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
--- Doc Text *updated* by Steven J. Levine ---
_clufter_ rebased to version 0.59.5
The _clufter_ packages, available as a Technology Preview, have been upgraded
to upstream version 0.59.5, which provides a number of bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381741
--- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Created attachment 1208232
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208232=edit
output of licensecheck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381741
--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381735
--- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Created attachment 1208231
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208231=edit
output of licensecheck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381516
--- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Created attachment 1208230
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208230=edit
output of licensecheck
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381735
--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381516
--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382810
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382797
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381741
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382813
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381735
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381516
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382810
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1382811
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Un-Retirement Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382813
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1382810
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1382810
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382813
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382813
Bug ID: 1382813
Summary: Review Request: unity-gtk-module - GTK+ module for
exporting old-style menus as GMenuModels
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382810
Bug ID: 1382810
Summary: Review Request: cinnamon-applet-globalappmenu - Ubuntu
AppMenu support for Cinnamon Desktop
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185002
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811
Bug ID: 1382811
Summary: Un-Retirement Review Request: appmenu-qt5 - Support
for global DBus-exported application menu in Qt5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367115
Feng Yu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rainwood...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382797
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||115
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382797
Bug ID: 1382797
Summary: Review Request: python-pyvo - Access to remote data
and services of the Virtual observatory (VO) using
Python
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Sorry, I've been busy with other stuff. I'll try to spin a new package this
weekend.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> License:Apache-2.0
ASL 2.0
> Group: Productivity/Networking/Other
> Group: Development/Libraries/C and C++
no need for that
> %{_includedir}/*
this is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
Bug ID: 1382755
Summary: Review Request: legion - A data-centric parallel
programming system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024
--- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
1) Changelog should be added for every
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Also, I want to note here that we have this process,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group to
get sponsored into the packager group. Can you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255
--- Comment #3 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Fixed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360277
--- Comment #2 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Fixed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360284
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
Also please fix your spec URL, which gives me an error 404.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
Your spec URL is a 404.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360277
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler ---
Your spec URL is a 404.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360284
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler ---
Note that this will become obsolete with Qt 5.8, where the 2D renderer becomes
part of qt5-qtdeclarative itself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024
--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
We have this process,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group to
get sponsored into the packager group. Can you either submit few more packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379165
--- Comment #12 from Christoph Junghans ---
> %global _hardened_build 1
Drop, it is the default, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages
> %make_build CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
Add LDFLAGS
%make_build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380528
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380528
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/multicat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Ken Goldman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kgold...@us.ibm.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382367
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember ---
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15983581 for example. Looks
like it first installed compat-openssl10 in the build root to solve a soname
based dep, and then, in a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348959
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Sykora ---
They're working again, thanks for warning me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382367
--- Comment #8 from Tomas Mraz ---
OK, will do. On the other hand I cannot find in koji failed task list the
broken builds you mention. Can you point me to one and what is the cause?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Haessler ---
to get rid of the .gitignore file we just need to add the second rm:
# Remove bundled lua
rm -rf src/external/lua/
# Remove .gitignore file
rm -f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|- provides
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681
Bug ID: 1382681
Summary: Review Request: - provides
functionality to create state machines from SCXML
files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379331
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311959
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354373
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379393
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382367
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ---
I temporarily untagged this from rawhide as it started breaking builds of other
packages. When you've imported openssl 1.1 and the build has landed in rawhide,
can you do "koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382655
Bug ID: 1382655
Summary: Review Request: pology - CLI tools for PO files
processing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
fedpkg-copr-0.8-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
fedpkg-copr-0.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
fedpkg-copr-0.8-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
--- Comment #46 from Tomas Mraz ---
I would not say this is really so huge task as the changes in most cases are
pretty straightforward. Also there will be no openssl-1.0.x in Fedora 26 that
could be used to build tss2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.9.1-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356552
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
php-onelogin-php-saml-2.9.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380528
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Thx for the quick review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo