https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #6 from Josef Ridky ---
No, it is not about length of %description, but about structure of this
section. Description should be breathe paragraph or a few sentences, but no
"checklist".
If you change this list into paragraph or sen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
libXfont2-2.0.1-2.fc25, tigervnc-1.7.0-3.fc25, xorg-x11-drivers-7.7-18.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu-1.1.2-3.20160929git97d7386c.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-armsoc-1.4.0-3.20160929.fc25,
xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.7.1-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
Jeremy Cline changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #5 from Brad Hubbard ---
1) I have no tests so I think %check is unneeded.
2) Are you saying %description is still too long since I removed the
"Features:" section?
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372889
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372893
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
jitterentropy-rngd-1.0.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #31 from Stuart Campbell ---
Hi, no problem I know how things are.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/stuartcampbell/rpm-packages/blob/master/sphinx-theme-bootstrap/sphinx-theme-bootstrap.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511
--- Comment #3 from Stuart Campbell ---
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/stuartcampbell/rpm-packages/blob/master/nexus/nexus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sic/science/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00453425-nexus/nexus-4.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
This package is licensed under the MIT License, the MIT License is visible in
setup.py and pypi page, and all source files have the full license text in
header, it is fine to accept this package without a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Please ask upstream to add a LICENSE file in the project directory, files have
the MIT License text in header but it is prefered to add a LICENSE text.
https://github.com/xingwu1/autorest/blob/master/Cli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358741
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291877
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358739
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||williamjmore...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260845
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #30 from William Moreno ---
Hi, sorry for the last feedback, but can you please update links using the
format:
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
Assignee|williamjmore...@gm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jer...@jcline.org
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mirrormanager2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
It's common in perl packages. Because it uses this structure:
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/DateTime/Calendar/Julian.pm
Any perl-DateTime-Calendar module will put a pm file in there. This one doesn'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
Is the file/folder ownership conflict intentional?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Kev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Add BR: perl-generators
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
SRPM URL:
https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.04-3.fc24.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Something I noticed right off the bat: perl-generators is missing as a
BuildRequires. perl-generators is no longer in the buildroot by default, so
dependencies will not be generated automatically.
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087
--- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner ---
Pravin,
thanks again. Approved in PkgDB.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1383483
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner ---
Thanks for the reminder. Could you take a look into bug #1380942?
As I'm busy with other things during the weeks, don't expect anything from me
for this review here earlier than on one of the next weeke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1382986
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488
Bug ID: 1383488
Summary: Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin
resource sharing library and stack middleware
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487
Bug ID: 1383487
Summary: Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth -
Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Since it is no longer 2005, I have removed the rm -rf %{buildroot} line from
%install.
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian.spec
SRPM URL:
https://spot.fedorapeople.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Regarding client, crawler or list needing -lib: no.
-lib is only for things that directly communicate with the database, meaning
the backend and the frontend.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
--- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Koji Rawhide scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16032959
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev ---
Raphael?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Fixed your remarks.
new Spec URL: https://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/mirrormanager2.spec
new SRPM URL:
https://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org/mirrormanager2-0.7.3-3.fc26.src.rpm
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383474
Bug ID: 1383474
Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian - Julian
Calendar support for DateTime.pm
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378160
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #6 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375735
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Bug 1271193 depends on bug 1381892, which changed state.
Bug 1381892 Summary: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1383447
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
Bug ID: 1383447
Summary: Review Request: python-winrm - Python library for
Windows Remote Management
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383434
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1383445
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
Bug ID: 1383445
Summary: Review Request: python-requests_ntlm - HTTP NTLM
authentication using the requests library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
Donald Pellegrino changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155058
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383434
Bug ID: 1383434
Summary: Review Request: python-ntlm3 - Python 3 compatible
NTLM library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
URL and source updated
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Donald Pellegrino from comment #11)
> I received the needinfo alert but I have not played with this build in a
> bit. I had given up due to the extent of the dependencies necessary. What
> nex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #38 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #37)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #36)
> > PETSc needs fftw-mpi libraries; it does not work with fftw actually
> > available on Fedora/EPEL.
>
> OK, so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #37 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #36)
> PETSc needs fftw-mpi libraries; it does not work with fftw actually
> available on Fedora/EPEL.
OK, so we should get rid of that (and chase the change for fftw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Bug ID: 1383416
Summary: Review Request: python-inlfuxdb - InfluxDB Python
client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Junghans ---
Re-added gcc-c++
Spec URL: http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion.spec
SRPM URL:
http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion-16.10.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
Review.txt: http://junghan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
--- Comment #4 from Josef Ridky ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730
--- Comment #11 from Donald Pellegrino ---
I received the needinfo alert but I have not played with this build in a bit. I
had given up due to the extent of the dependencies necessary. What next step
might I take to help out here?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1270740
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1272570
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1272592
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> Undid adding gcc-c++
By guidelines you must include all dependencies which you are using.
Don't rely completely on fedora-review.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guideli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1272592
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300014
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter component|Rebase clufter component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter component|Rebase clufter component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter component|Rebase clufter component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300050
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
The URL and Source0 are wrong for this package.
From what I can tell, this would be valid for this package:
URL: https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{v
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1300050
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1328078 |
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1328078
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147817
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Junghans ---
Undid adding gcc-c++ and added as-needed to LDFLAGS:
Spec URL: http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion.spec
SRPM URL:
http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion-16.10.0-1.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #19 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #18)
> (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #16)
> > > Just checked all bits.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #18 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #17)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> > if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> > xattr_runs=true
> >
> >
> > hmm, then do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> xattr_runs=true
>
>
> hmm, then don't drop it.
As I said, it's only a warning.
(In reply
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #15 from Igor Gnatenko ---
if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
xattr_runs=true
hmm, then don't drop it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #13)
> As I can see, not all bits were applied from patch which I attached...
>
> > BuildRequires: attr
> not removed, it's useless BR
configur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #21 from Shawn Starr ---
Well, if it's acceptable to Debian surely this should be acceptable to Fedora,
if not something seems wrong with our policy...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Fixed those remarks except for %{buildroot} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, as that's
personal preference.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com
Assignee|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381935
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
95 matches
Mail list logo