https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
--- Comment #14 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to Jared Wallace from comment #13)
> Tried running fedora-review on it, but the build failed...
>
> Package pkgconfig-1:0.29.1-1.fc25.x86_64 is already installed, skipping.
> No matching
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
you are right. Sorry was busy yesterday and Internet was down. Its just up.
here is what I propose this package spec
https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/rpmdeplint.spec
Also, was trying to make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #5 from Dan Callaghan ---
On second thought, rpmdeplint is also exposing a Python API so I guess for
completeness I should really make this package python-rpmdeplint which produces
python2-rpmdeplint and python3-rpmdeplint. On Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #4 from Dan Callaghan ---
Yeah, so are you saying for the Fedora package you would prefer it is built
against and runs in python3 instead of python2? I would leave it as python2 for
EPEL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
Jared Wallace changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jared-wall...@us.ibm.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #3 from Jared Wallace ---
Since it wasn't made clear, this package was orphaned and retired:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/orpie/
Not sure now if it requires review or not.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
--- Comment #2 from Jared Wallace ---
Tried the fedora-review tool, which fails since the original post did not have
raw links. So let's fix that.
Spec:https://bitbucket.org/jared-wallace/orpie/raw/2abe80a8c1e7e7c7a72056e14d72380828ccd937/SPE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter |
--- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawsk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package unretired
Package does not use a name that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344261
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you can take a look into bug
#1385856?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016444
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227981
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1385856 |
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385856
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1196920 |
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385856
Bug ID: 1385856
Summary: Review Request: log4shib - C++ logging library for
Shibboleth (OpenSAML)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197517
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
Maybe you can take a look into bug #1385856?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1385856
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385856
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner ---
Spec URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/daasi/shibboleth/log4shib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/daasi/shibboleth/log4shib-1.0.9-2.fc25.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner ---
This library is needed to update shibboleth stack, I'll take over here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371296
--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interested in packaging zsh-completions and zsh-autosuggestions, too?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pandas-datareader
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always noti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385728
Bug ID: 1385728
Summary: Review Request: perl-Specio-Library-Path-Tiny -
Path::Tiny types and coercions for Specio
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1385616
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: vimwiki - A |Review Request: vim-wiki -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336255
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373019
--- Comment #2 from Juan Orti ---
Hi, thanks for the comments.
I've updated the macros as you said. I will ask upstream to include a license
file.
Spec URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/python-fuse/python-fuse.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jorti.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
--- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual ---
Thank you for the review!
I will remove the tests for the moment
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302744
Bug 1302744 depends on bug 1385223, which changed state.
Bug 1385223 Summary: Review Request: python-rangehttpserver - SimpleHTTPServer
with support for Range requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385223
What|Remo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385223
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #6 from David Moreau Simard ---
Also, worth mentioning that I've toyed with the idea around also packaging
tests and docs but they are not included in the release tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #5 from David Moreau Simard ---
@Chandan, yes, I did notice the setup.py had extra requirements that were not
expressed in requirements.txt but it looked to me like they were not used.
Thanks for confirming.
I'm not sure what you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196920
Guido Grazioli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385223
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-rangehttpserver
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pykwalify
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379778
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-diff-match-patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385180
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/purple-facebook
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371296
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/zsh-syntax-highlighting
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme ---
I still have a problem with the requires. The list is:
- 'django>=1.7',
- 'django-model-utils>=2.0.3',
- 'jsonfield>=1.0.3',
- 'pytz'
But you only included django and pytz. In addition, from what I see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from J
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781
--- Comment #2 from Michal Vala ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/sparkoo/sunflow/releases/download/v0.07.3.8097f6d/sunflow.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/sparkoo/sunflow/releases/download/v0.07.3.8097f6d/sunflow-0.07.3-8097f6d.fc24.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
--- Comment #4 from Chandan Kumar ---
Hello David,
After doing git grep sseclient and six, found that sseclient and six is not
required but due to present under install_requires in setup.py
https://github.com/thefactory/marathon-python/blob/m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385105
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chku...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381087
--- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual ---
New files with you changes. There several bugs upstream about failing tests. I
have enabled tests but the build will not fail on tests failing. Not all tests
seem to be installed, so I'm running the test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272174
Luboš Uhliarik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||golang-github-pmezard-go-di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
--- Comment #2 from Sundeep Anand ---
Thanks for the review. Updated package:
SPEC URL:
https://bitbucket.org/sundeep_co_in/python-pkgs/downloads/python-django-notifications-hq.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/sundeep_co_in/python-pkgs/d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534
Chandan Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|pyth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534
Bug ID: 1385534
Summary: Review Request: python-ruamel-ordereddict -
ruamel-ordereddict
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: mediu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Yeah I was just checking spec for py3 compatibility before posting any review.
I see setup.py says its compatible with py3.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #31 from Andrew Elwell ---
Hi, is there any movement on this? If not I'll start a new package based on the
current upsream release of 16.05.5 (http://slurm.schedmd.com/download.html)
Andrew
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366355
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
acme-tiny-0.1-10.20160810git5a7b4e7.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail b
52 matches
Mail list logo
