https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.2.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303349
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303349
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|l...@sub-pop.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303349
--- Comment #7 from Link Dupont ---
Sorry. I'm not yet approved as a packager, so I can't actually flag this as +.
I was hoping I would be on the 16th, but its taking longer than expected. I'll
return this one to the pool for someone else to p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358917
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
> %files static
> %license LICENSE.TERMS
> %doc README
Since -static requires -devel and -devel requires the base package, there is
absolutely no need to duplicate the %license and %doc file in the -st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365319
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bl...@verdurin.com
Componen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
--- Comment #39 from Paul Colby ---
Thanks Michael :)
Back to square one, but that's a whole lot better than being on a non-existent
/ invalid square ;)
Now to find a sponsor...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #6 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Regarding monolog stuff: Great catch! I'll check out comparability. Hopefully
I can at least package the latest sentry/sentry 0.x version (0.22.0).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #10 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #8)
> Arm builds are broken:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16199958
Looks like those builds are b0rk3n, because %{arm} arches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
--- Comment #9 from Christoph Junghans ---
Excluded arm for now:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16243810
Spec URL http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/legion/legion.spec
SRPM URL
http://junghans.github.io/fedora-review/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370449
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
rtv-1.12.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383434
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ntlm3-1.0.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383434
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ntlm3-1.0.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383445
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-requests_ntlm-0.3.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370449
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
rtv-1.12.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-scour
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Excellent, thank you so much! Please post a link to a review of yours, if you
have one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Fixed, same URLs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Also, the conditional should be near the files list rather than the top. I
forget why this is the case, but I think it was important.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
The licensedir conditional at the top needs the extra "%" removed on the %doc,
otherwise it defines "%license" as "%%doc", which doesn't work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Thanks!
SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-scour/python-scour-0.35-2.fc24.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-scour/python-scour.spec
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa ---
The error for the GitHub Source URL is easy to fix.
You can change it to one of the following:
Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{modname}-%{version}.tar.gz
or
Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}.tar.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389091
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/tang
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382926
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389091
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #11 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Hans Pabst from comment #10)
> > Unfortunately an SSE2 baseline is necessary for packaging.
> Well, SSE2 is "nothing" wrt 64-bit since it's already part of the 64-bit ABI.
Yes, that's the point.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Just to check what composer pull (from monolog)
- Installing sentry/sentry (0.13.0)
Downloading: 100%
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
obs-build-20161025-231.1.1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.2.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Remi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 1215026
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1215026&action=edit
review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 1215025
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1215025&action=edit
phpci.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.0.1 DB version 1.14.0 built Oct 15 2016 18:25:40 CEST
static analyze resu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387447
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1389772
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389784
Bug ID: 1389784
Summary: Review Request: python-scour - An SVG scrubber
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #38 from Michael Schw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374137
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
* Fri Oct 28 2016 Richard Shaw - 7.3.1-1
- Update to latest upstream release.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.2.0-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374137
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.2.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.2.0-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #10 from Hans Pabst ---
> Unfortunately an SSE2 baseline is necessary for packaging.
Well, SSE2 is "nothing" wrt 64-bit since it's already part of the 64-bit ABI.
> There are actually AMD Barcelonas
They support SSE3; no problem!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #9 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Hans Pabst from comment #8)
> Thank you all for reviewing/maintaining this package!
Apologies for not referring to it previously. I hadn't got round to making the
bug report where I just have do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389695
Bug ID: 1389695
Summary: Review Request: python-wcsaxes - A Python framework
for plotting astronomical and geospatial data
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708664
Filip Szymański changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708664
Filip Szymański changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303349
--- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede ---
I don't see anything in the review I need to fix, did you forget to set the
fedora-review flag to +, or ... ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgood...@redhat.com
--- Comment #37 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
--- Comment #36 from Paul Colby ---
(In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #27)
> Hmm, OK, thanks Michael. I've reset that unusual flags setting, hopefully
> that gets some additional eyeballs on this one.
Hi Nathan. It seems that did not a
55 matches
Mail list logo
