https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009654
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
tempus-fugit-1.2-0.1.SNAPSHOT.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117961
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389985
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341662
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358959
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366862
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347878
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393044
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Sure, the mechanism is completely different, so it isn't unexpected. But does
it this package work *better* in any way?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393044
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393044
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370533
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |POST
Resolution|D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342724
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369535
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370533
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
python-django-jsonfield-1.0.3-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b313ece71e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370533
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ignate...@redhat.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376867
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379830
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382995
--- Comment #9 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> Sure! Done
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387250
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
--- Comment #13 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #12)
> APPROVED
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|punto...@libero.it |extras...@fedoraproject.org
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394147
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa ---
Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382995
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #7)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #3)
> > > Can you review bug 1187082?
> >
> > it is already assigned s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |punto...@libero.it
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625481
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pleme...@redhat.com
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394147
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
--
You are recei
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382995
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #3)
> > Can you review bug 1187082?
>
> it is already assigned some other review?
Oh, I asked someone if they could
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|piotr1...@gmail.com
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
--- Comment #19 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Piotr Popieluch from comment #18)
> Looks good, approved.
Thanks!
> Thing to keep in mind is the non-numeric version number. This is only
> allowed when they increment properly otherwise it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386938
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209214
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386938
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361471
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376932
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #2 from marcindulak ---
example koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16424811
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388908
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384242
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
--- Comment #1 from marcindulak ---
Problems reported by fedora-review:
daq.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libsfbpf.so.0.0.1
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
daq.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libsfbpf.so.0.0.1
daq.x86_64:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502
Bug ID: 1394502
Summary: Review Request: daq - Data Acquisition Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384048
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389346
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394250
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389311
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009654
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394147
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372345
Dmitry Tantsur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtant...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande ---
Why are you using coot-rdkit.patch ?
--- lbg/lbg-search.cc_orig2016-11-09 18:29:44.870809951 -0500
+++ lbg/lbg-search.cc2016-11-09 18:42:43.549933656 -0500
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
#include "geometry/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390477
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390477
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392838
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> coot does not compile on rawhide:
>
> libtool: compile: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"coot\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"coot\"
> -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.8.7\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394167
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from At
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599
--- Comment #7 from Jared Wallace ---
Awesome. Manpage is uploaded as an attachment :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599
--- Comment #6 from Jared Wallace ---
Created attachment 1220028
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1220028&action=edit
basic manpage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362130
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam@sam.today
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879740
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(georgi.t.valkov@g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394147
Greg Bailey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gbai...@lxpro.com
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599
--- Comment #5 from srakitnican ---
Yes it seems author prefers GitHub and may make new releases for GitHub only.
I've managed to work out release tagging with upstream so I've switched sources
to use GitHub after all.
New version with issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599
--- Comment #4 from Jared Wallace ---
No worries on the manpage. If I have time today, I'll throw something together
based off the builtin help it offers.
As far as GH versus sourceforge...I'll defer to more experienced hands. I
suppose on se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394147
--- Comment #17 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #16)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> > @Wim:
> >
> > Unless the situation has changed recently, you cannot use rich dependencies
> > in Requires, Recomme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394167
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
--- Comment #19 from Samuel Gyger ---
If this is how it should be, than I think working with upstream is the way to
go. The author is very responsive, at least in my experience.
I don't know how locales for python packages are handled.
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394147
--- Comment #16 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3)
> @Wim:
>
> Unless the situation has changed recently, you cannot use rich dependencies
> in Requires, Recommends, or Conflicts until Fedora release engineering t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599
--- Comment #3 from srakitnican ---
Thank you for you review and pointers, couple of issues are not clear to me on
what to do about.
(In reply to Jared Wallace from comment #2)
> Issues
> ==
>
> 1) *MUST* The description has line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323214
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566
--- Comment #32 from Adam Huffman ---
Hi Andrew,
I'm happy to review your 16.05.x package if you submit it.
Haven't heard from David in several months, so this does appear to be stalled
at the moment.
Adam
--
You are receiving this mail
72 matches
Mail list logo