https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
--- Comment #3 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347878
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
xorsearch-1.11.1-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3507bc8eea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347878
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
xorsearch-1.11.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b043636f33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347878
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
--- Comment #1 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
There are two reasons for including a package in -ugly: 1) license of included
code or dependent library is "stronger" than LGPL (usually GPL), and/or 2)
software patents. The former should still be ac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394148
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397261
Bug ID: 1397261
Summary: Review Request: gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free -
GStreamer ugly plugins
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396139
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1397261
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
--- Comment #6 from Sundeep Anand ---
Thank you for pointing this! Have corrected and updated package:
SPEC URL:
https://bitbucket.org/sundeep_co_in/python-pkgs/downloads/python-django-notifications-hq.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/su
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396139
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yselk...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Newton ---
Reuploading and disabling hardened build
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/pcsxr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/pcsxr-1.9.94-3.fc25.src.rpm
Also, koji s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387873
--- Comment #6 from Michal Ambroz ---
Thanks Zbysek for comments.
Updated package:
Spec URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python2-pyx.spec
SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python2-pyx-0.12.1-4.fc24.src.rpm
Best regards
Mi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394952
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391444
--- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar ---
@Jason: it's a RDO package review, RDO being based upon CentOS 7 (though we try
tofollow Fedora guidelines when possible)
Actually, we're following the //-installable boost package in EPEL convention
(Boos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
--- Comment #17 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Matthias Mailänder from comment #16)
> If getting software into Fedora is such an bureaucratic, time-consuming and
> laborious act, we could also collaborate together on a FlatPak/AppImage
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394952
Merlin Mathesius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mmathesi@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347878
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/xorsearch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394250
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371810
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372889
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382928
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
modulemd-1.0.2-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395396
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski ---
Spec URL: https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-sphinx-gallery.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-sphinx-gallery-0.1.5-1.fc26.src.rpm
* Mon Nov 21 2016 Orion Poplawsk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394952
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mmathesi@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
--- Comment #16 from Matthias Mailänder ---
If getting software into Fedora is such an bureaucratic, time-consuming and
laborious act, we could also collaborate together on a FlatPak/AppImage bundle
that works across distributions. https://git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334
--- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Link Dupont from comment #6)
> It does run without those fonts in that path. I assumed it would fall back
> to the system-provided fonts, and it appears I was lucky it did. So no need
> to sy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
--- Comment #15 from Matthias Mailänder ---
If getting software into Fedora is such an bureaucratic, time-consuming and
laborious we could also collaborate together on a FlatPak/AppImage bundle that
works across distributions. https://github.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #7 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #6)
>
> Any status on this? Are you still interested in packaging this?
> I can review this if you're interested in a review swap.
ok lets us swap the review.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Elemental - |Review Request: elemental -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #19 from Antonio Trande ---
- Code under external/suite_sparse is under LGPLv2+ license.
Other code/cmake files is MIT, Boost.
Please, update License tag and pack debian/copyright by using
%license tag.
- Don't need to execu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394952
Merlin Mathesius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mmathesi@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexjn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396296
Steve Linabery changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352837
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexjn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396296
Lon Hohberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155793
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #30 from Ben
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexjn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334
--- Comment #6 from Link Dupont ---
It does run without those fonts in that path. I assumed it would fall back to
the system-provided fonts, and it appears I was lucky it did. So no need to
symlink to system-level fonts. Pulling them in via Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
--- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme ---
- Can you launch the tests on python 3 too ? I also think that since you may
not be packaging python 2 depending on the system, you should guard the python
2 tests with the %if 0%{?with_python2} macros.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1364745 (FE-GAMESIG)
Referenced Bugs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140
Bug ID: 1397140
Summary: Review Request: mrrescue - Arcade-style fire fighting
game
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395554
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter ---
* Mon Nov 21 2016 Fabian Affolter - 1.3.2-1
- Add license file
- Run test without third party interaction
- Update to latest upstream release 1.3.2
Updates files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
Daiki Ueno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||du...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
compromise: drop from summary, include in description if you insist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and comp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
It's a slippery slope (I shudder thinking if *all* packages mentioned largely
irrelevant technical details), but I can understand your point of view even if
I disagree with it.
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
And I think this is actually essential information and the main reason why I
would pick one application over another doing the same thing. I don't like your
removal of these mentions at all.
--
You are re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395804
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389404
--- Comment #2 from David Hannequin ---
Hi,
You right directory /usr/lib/pythonX/site-packages/tests isn't necessary for
package.
I delete this directory after test rpm.
Best regard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
Bug ID: 1397089
Summary: Review Request: DNSCryptClient - qt gui for dnscrypt
proxy
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394215
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Tie-DataUUID-1.02-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7a74d13110
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394240
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394174
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.11-1.fc25 perl-XML-Spice-0.05-1.fc25 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1fb58d68c4
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.11-1.fc24 perl-XML-Spice-0.05-1.fc24 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a19778f161
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.11-1.fc24 perl-XML-Spice-0.05-1.fc24 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a19778f161
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394174
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.11-1.fc24 perl-XML-Spice-0.05-1.fc24 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a19778f161
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394174
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.11-1.fc25 perl-XML-Spice-0.05-1.fc25 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1fb58d68c4
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.11-1.fc25 perl-XML-Spice-0.05-1.fc25 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1fb58d68c4
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394215
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394240
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-XML-Fast-0.11-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-84113c90c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
can you add
%pom_xpath_inject "pom:project" "bundle"
%pom_add_plugin org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin . "
true
true
com.github.ben-manes.caffeine
com.github.ben-manes.caffeine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
David Hannequin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
- Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Note: Jar files in source (see attachment)
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-
built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_sof
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
Only a question can you build guava and jcache sub modules?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tre...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Is available a new relase 2.3.5. Please, consider updating
Please, use:
Source0:
https://github.com/ben-manes/%{name}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
instead of
Source0:https://githu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389346
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to David Hannequin from comment #2)
> Is what I need to delete .egg-info ?
There's no need to delete it in .spec. If you do delete it, it's not a big
deal, but it's unnecessary.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1324020
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1341272 |1397051
--- Comment #26 from Tomas Repi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
Bug ID: 1397051
Summary: Review Request: caffeine - High performance java 8
caching library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394183
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-VCardFast-0.11-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-02d23ebb5a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394183
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394183
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Text-VCardFast-0.11-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d21eb3c9e9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Net-DAVTalk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
stress-ng-0.07.05-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b925ae12fa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
stress-ng-0.07.05-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0663121c05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
stress-ng-0.07.05-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7960f25459
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
>rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/default/data/fonts
Have you tested freeorion?
Does it use the icons?
Usually, bundled icons are replaced with symbolic links to system icons.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
stress-ng-0.07.05-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3bb7571351
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
stress-ng-0.07.05-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3e8476982e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
stress-ng-0.07.05-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ef192fa61
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198760
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407
--- Comment #14 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
License field changed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389346
--- Comment #2 from David Hannequin ---
Hi,
I fix description and summary with %_description and %{summary}.
Is what I need to delete .egg-info ?
Best regard
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
--- Comment #1 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16552737
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
Bug ID: 1397030
Summary: Review Request: mingw-libidn2 - MinGW Windows
Internationalized Domain Name 2008 support library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394242
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389695
--- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual ---
Great, thank you for the review anyway
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
