https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1324020 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1397051 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312303
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403030
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yeah, you actually need to install both jhdf5 and jhdf. So the command should
be
mock -i
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1360/16821360/jhdf5-3.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #29)
> (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #28)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27)
> > > Created attachment 1221971 [details]
> > > review log
> > >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403030
--- Comment #6 from Jos de Kloe ---
Thanks for your hint.
It seems I am too inexperienced juggling with mock, since I run straight into
another problem.
This time the build fails because the spec file requires jhdf5 and thus tries
to install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398929
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
brightnessctl-0.1.1_p2-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372918
Jakub Jedelsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub.jedel...@gmail.com
Ass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352837
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy Newton ---
If you're still interested, please let me know, I have the following available
for swap:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403423
I'm just waiting on you to update the specs before I can revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #19 from Jeremy Newton ---
I still get the claw error when building in mock.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #14 from Jeremy Newton ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %pos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1403607
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403600
--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
This package is a revival of the recently retired version. The build will not
work but I think this is a place to provide guidance and suggestion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403600
Bug ID: 1403600
Summary: Review Request: YafaRay - A free open-source
raytracing render engine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375765
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Newton ---
In the short term, we can just exclude the duplicate files from the two games
and have them require the bear packages. I'm looking into the review right now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #12 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #6)
> You need to use BuildConflicts not Conflicts.
>
> As for libclaw, it definitely does exist for f25/26:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/libclaw
> It was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #32 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #31)
> (In reply to MartinKG from comment #30)
> > (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #29)
> > > Just some documentation fixes to silence some rpmlint warnings:
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387669
--- Comment #6 from Wolnei Junior ---
Changed paths.
V2 Spec URL: https://wolnei.fedorapeople.org/rpm/kio-gdrive/kio-gdrive.spec
V2 SRPM URL:
https://wolnei.fedorapeople.org/rpm/kio-gdrive/kio-gdrive-1.0.4-1.fc25.src.rpm
Package review http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037427
Wolnei Junior changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@wolnei.com.br
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #31 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #30)
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #29)
> > Just some documentation fixes to silence some rpmlint warnings:
> >
> > - Use the following for portal's descrip
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393899
--- Comment #20 from Ville Skyttä ---
It seems to be ok. However, looking at the build log:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libdirq/0.4/2.fc26/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
> using cflags=-O -DNDEBUG -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Wshado
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376940
Bug 1376940 depends on bug 1309909, which changed state.
Bug 1309909 Summary: Review Request: python3-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking
web server and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402164
Dhanesh B. Sabane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhanes...@disroot.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani ---
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/eigen3-3.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm
See also [1]. Debian has a patch for 3.3.0 [2] but it is reported to not work
properly [3].
[1] https://github.com/cryos/avogadro/issues/84
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande ---
> This package is needed to keep Avogadro building, which does not support
> eigen3 >= 3.3.0.
Oh, you are referring to next Eigen3 release.
Can you provide me an eigen3-3.3.0 src-rpm package please?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
pgcenter-0.2.0-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
Avogadro is already built against Eigen3:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6814
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403554
Bug ID: 1403554
Summary: Review Request: eigen2 - Obsolete version of the eigen
vector and matrix math C++ template library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382850
--- Comment #2 from Till Maas ---
There are no changelog entries in the spec.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396761
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Till M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Tracking
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357204
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
Okay, let's wait till those things got sorted out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #30 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #29)
> Just some documentation fixes to silence some rpmlint warnings:
>
> - Use the following for portal's description:
> Summary:Lollypop flatpak portal (adva
37 matches
Mail list logo