https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415190
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-onionbalance-0.1.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-backports-shutil_which-3.5.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Astro-SunTime-0.05-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406786
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
configsnap-0.11-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Spec URL:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/python-backports-unittest_mock/python-backports-unittest_mock.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/python-backports-unittest_mock/pytho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412128
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
libpreludedb-3.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
tpm2-tools-1.1.0-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sphinx-bootstrap-theme-0.4.13-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-a7e5a4ef7a
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sphinx-bootstrap-theme-0.4.13-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-cc6efe50e5
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418785
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415190
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Review notes:
+ Generally complies with packaging guidelines
+ Package is named appropriately
+ Consistently uses macros
! /usr/bin/env is a requirement
! rpmlint error:
- ufw-kde.x86_64: E: wrong-script-i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406786
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
configsnap-0.11-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410651
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
minetestmapper-20161218-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-75083a4e0f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410651
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Review notes:
+ Package is appropriately named
+ Subpackages are named correctly per current Python packaging guidelines
- %python_provide macro usage is missing on Python module subpackages
+ License noted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi ---
BTW, this package is needed for the python2 tests of python-setuptools recent
versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
Bug ID: 1419291
Summary: Review Request: python-backports-unittest_mock -
backport of unittest mock for python 3.2 and before
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418429
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com,
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418428
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ape...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Ala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410651
--- Comment #14 from Ben Rosser ---
Oh, I see; that would be why the build was failing on EPEL. Thanks!
Fixed, will send out a new bodhi update with that change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418933
--- Comment #4 from Matej Marušák ---
Thanks for your review.
I addressed mentioned issues and fixed them. New specfile and source rpm are
now:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/abrt/abrt-server-info-page/master/abrt-server-info-pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418310
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Bauer ---
Patch submitted upstream:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=120112
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418310
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Bauer ---
Created attachment 1247725
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1247725&action=edit
Patch HTTP.pm to handle an undefined endpoint
Rawhide would not build due to a failed test on HTTP.t. Rele
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418310
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Bauer ---
After much troubleshooting, the build failure was isolated to only rawhide. The
root cause turned out to be a value for endpoint was not defined:
https://github.com/scrottie/SOAP-WSDL/blob/master/lib/SOAP/W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418882
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.105.git708a8a8.20170204.fc25 libyui-bindings-1.1.1-10.fc25
libyui-mga-1.0.8-0.3.gita6a160e.20160313.fc25
libyui-mga-gtk-1.0.2-0.4.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc25
libyui-mga-ncurses-1.0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418785
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418872
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.105.git708a8a8.20170204.fc25 libyui-bindings-1.1.1-10.fc25
libyui-mga-1.0.8-0.3.gita6a160e.20160313.fc25
libyui-mga-gtk-1.0.2-0.4.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc25
libyui-mga-ncurses-1.0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.105.git708a8a8.20170204.fc25 libyui-bindings-1.1.1-10.fc25
libyui-mga-1.0.8-0.3.gita6a160e.20160313.fc25
libyui-mga-gtk-1.0.2-0.4.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc25
libyui-mga-ncurses-1.0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.105.git708a8a8.20170204.fc25 libyui-bindings-1.1.1-10.fc25
libyui-mga-1.0.8-0.3.gita6a160e.20160313.fc25
libyui-mga-gtk-1.0.2-0.4.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc25
libyui-mga-ncurses-1.0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418785
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
dnfdragora-0.0.0-0.105.git708a8a8.20170204.fc25 libyui-bindings-1.1.1-10.fc25
libyui-mga-1.0.8-0.3.gita6a160e.20160313.fc25
libyui-mga-gtk-1.0.2-0.4.git22f2cf6.20131215.fc25
libyui-mga-ncurses-1.0.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419267
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419265
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419267
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Fixed:
Spec URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/switchboard-plug-notifications.spec
SRPM URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/switchboard-plug-notifications-0.1.1-5.fc25.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419265
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Fixed:
Spec URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/switchboard-plug-networking.spec
SRPM URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/switchboard-plug-networking-0.1.0.3-3.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391444
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410953
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418428
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419267
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Review notes:
I would suggest changing the Supplements line to the following:
> Supplements:(switchboard%{?_isa} and gala%{?_isa})
The reason being is that this plug is only useful if both gala and swi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410951
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419267
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419265
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
Review notes:
I would suggest changing the Supplements line to the following:
> Supplements:(switchboard%{?_isa} and NetworkManager%{?_isa})
The reason being is that this plug is only useful if both NM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419265
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419272
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419262
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419262
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419192
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419192
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419198
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419198
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419226
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419194
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419194
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419262
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419265
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419267
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419198
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419194
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419192
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
Ping? While I'm not in a rush to get this package into Fedora proper (I have it
in my Kannolo Copr), it would still be useful to get this off my todo list at
some point.
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419272
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1419273
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419272
Bug ID: 1419272
Summary: Review Request: ck - Concurrency Kit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419271
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1373513 (RDO-OCATA)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419271
Bug ID: 1419271
Summary: Review Request: leatherman -A collection of C++ and
CMake utility libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.l...@manchester.ac.uk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419267
Bug ID: 1419267
Summary: Review Request: switchboard-plug-notifications -
Switchboard Notifications plug
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419265
Bug ID: 1419265
Summary: Review Request: switchboard-plug-networking -
Switchboard Networking plug
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419262
Bug ID: 1419262
Summary: Review Request: switchboard-plug-mouse-touchpad -
Switchboard Mouse and Touchpad plug
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419259
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1060151
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419259
Bug ID: 1419259
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake-contrib - Additional
libraries for Rake
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415190
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-onionbalance-0.1.6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-a77047740b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415190
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-onionbalance-0.1.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-56450e4920
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
Marcel Haerry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mh+fedora@scrit.c |
|h)
86 matches
Mail list logo