https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419027
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409243
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sphinx-bootstrap-theme-0.4.13-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #52 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410651
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410651
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
minetestmapper-20161218-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379
Bug ID: 1419379
Summary: Review Request: libefp - A full implementation of the
Effective Fragment Potential (EFP) method
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419379
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1419365
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler ---
Thanks, package requested in pkgdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ---
Spec URL:
https://svn.calcforge.org/viewvc/*checkout*/kannolo/trunk/packages/ufw-kde/ufw-kde.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kkofler/kannolo/fedora-26-x86_64/00507752-ufw-kde/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
Bug ID: 1419366
Summary: Review Request: pybind11 - Seamless operability
between C++11 and Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1419365
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332052
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-filelock-2.0.6-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419361
Bug ID: 1419361
Summary: Review Request: js-jquery-datetimepicker - jQuery
Plugin Date and Time Picker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Bug 1418788 depends on bug 1418882, which changed state.
Bug 1418882 Summary: Review Request: libyui-mga-qt - Libyui-Qt extensions for
Mageia tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418882
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Bug 1418788 depends on bug 1418872, which changed state.
Bug 1418872 Summary: Review Request: libyui-mga-ncurses - Libyui-Ncurses
extensions for Mageia tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418872
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418872
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418785
Bug 1418785 depends on bug 1418661, which changed state.
Bug 1418661 Summary: Review Request: libyui-mga - Libyui extensions for Mageia
tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
What|Removed |A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418785
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418872
Bug 1418872 depends on bug 1418661, which changed state.
Bug 1418661 Summary: Review Request: libyui-mga - Libyui extensions for Mageia
tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
What|Removed |A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418882
Bug 1418882 depends on bug 1418661, which changed state.
Bug 1418661 Summary: Review Request: libyui-mga - Libyui extensions for Mageia
tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418661
What|Removed |A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Bug 1418788 depends on bug 1418785, which changed state.
Bug 1418785 Summary: Review Request: libyui-mga-gtk - Libyui-Gtk extensions for
Mageia tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418785
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418788
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.3-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413339
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
php-evenement-2.0.0-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411188
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
php-echonest-api-0-0.3.20131228git.662d62a7.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora
25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410651
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419291
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #4)
> Meh, I still don't see what's so bad about using /usr/bin/env, but I can fix
> that, it should be a one-line patch.
>
> Anything else I should fix while I am at i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419152
Eduardo Mayorga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418157
--- Comment #2 from Darryl T. Agostinelli ---
Thank you for your review. As this is my first time, I have some questions.
* After I make the revisions, shall I bump the version number in the .spec file
or the release number or bump nothing?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419333
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419333
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419331
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419331
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if pre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412068
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ---
Meh, I still don't see what's so bad about using /usr/bin/env, but I can fix
that, it should be a one-line patch.
Anything else I should fix while I am at it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419333
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419331
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419333
Bug ID: 1419333
Summary: Review Request: switchboard-plug-printers -
Switchboard Printers Plug
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #8 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
So, overall it looks very good.
Only things to clarify:
Must:
! license file in all packages
? %gem_install and %install sections -> double work?
Optional:
? Tabstops for the tags to have a nicer spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419332
Bug ID: 1419332
Summary: Review Request: deepin-shortcut-viewer - deepin
shortcut viewer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #7 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
Hi Marcel
- Please add the license file to all packages and subpackages via %license, i
think it is either missing in the main package or the -doc subpackage
- Please make use of the %gem_install macro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #6 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #5 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
Hi Marcel
- Please add the license file to all packages and subpackages via %license, i
think it is either missing in the main package or the -doc subpackage
-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #4 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419331
Bug ID: 1419331
Summary: Review Request: switchboard-plug-keyboard -
Switchboard Keyboard plug
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419330
Bug ID: 1419330
Summary: Review Request: deepin-menu - deepin menu service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #3 from Sascha Spreitzer ---
Thank you!
As I am using fedora-review it is better I am pasting the plain/raw link
version of the spec link here for automatic processing.
Spec URL:
http://git.scrit.ch/srpm/rubygem-base32/plain/SPEC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419317
Bug ID: 1419317
Summary: Review Request: deepin-terminal - terminal emulation
application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: med
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416477
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418157
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Help:
> I wish I had a successful koji build, but I can't get past this error.
> Please advise:
> `/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Fklvv2: line 31: fg: no job control`
Since the koji buildroots (using Mock) are mor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091
--- Comment #18 from Matthias Mailänder ---
I managed to drop 2 dependencies with
https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/12702 with the help of the Maxmind C#
developers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
55 matches
Mail list logo