https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402319
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge ---
embarrassing, I' sorry about that.
Could you please try again (same links)
Koji builds fine now:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18025665
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425275
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 1257156
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1257156&action=edit
system-fonts.patch
Here is a simple patch which allow to remove all bundled fonts and switch to a
default s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426516
Bug ID: 1426516
Summary: Review Request: takari-smart-builder - A replacement
scheduling projects builds in a Maven multi-module
build
Product: Fedora
Version: r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426465
Bug ID: 1426465
Summary: Review Request: libiio - Library for Industrial IO
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423390
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
prewikka-3.1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424721
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
php-maennchen-zipstream-php-0.4.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wik
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #16 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Just corrected spec location
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gsequencer-0.7.122.6-0.fc25.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #15 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Providing a version with improved stability:
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gsequencer-0.7.122.6-0.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423390
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
prewikka-3.1.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424721
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402164
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||artem.goncha...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
--- Comment #7 from Susi Lehtola ---
Due to the architure dependent failure, it's probably better to bend the rules
a little bit and drop BuildArch: noarch so that the package gets built and
tested on all architectures. I'm now also running th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
--- Comment #6 from Susi Lehtola ---
OK, there's a weird problem on i686 and ppc64, see
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18017637
Filed ticket upstream at
https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/694
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419226
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423390
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410953
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-cffi-1.9.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410953
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415331
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/enjarify
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425934
--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro ---
Hi Ben, I am taking this review!
I don't think we need a python 2 binary nor have them versioned as mtg-X-Y. See
[1] for reference.
There are no egg.info directories in the package, so there's no need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
--- Comment #5 from Susi Lehtola ---
I can't actually reproduce your error. Builds fine for me in mock both for
Fedora 25 and rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415331
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Thanks.
It's still exactly release 1.0.3, except that the tarball is generated by hand.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
--- Comment #4 from Susi Lehtola ---
That's a bug in the unstable gcc in rawhide. Please build against f25, where it
works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415438
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
There's no need to include jsl.node.conf in the built package - it's just
configuration for a lint tool.
There's also no need to disable the tests - not sure what the nyc comment is
about as they use a combi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415331
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415438
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415438
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415437
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
The test tar ball in the srpm seems to be the wrong one and as a result the
tape command to run the tests isn't actually doing anything as the file it
tries to run doesn't exist.
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425934
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415437
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415437
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413295
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Tom H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413295
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413295
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424856
--- Comment #5 from Dan Naughton ---
Created attachment 1256993
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1256993&action=edit
Output of fedora-review in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock
There are a few warnings here, but as far as I can t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424856
--- Comment #4 from Dan Naughton ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davidjkrause/comedi-contec-rpm/master/comedilib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dnaughton/comedilib/fedora-25-x86_64/00516741-comed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426333
Bug ID: 1426333
Summary: Review Request: jline3 - JLine is a Java library for
handling console input
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #29 from Orion Poplawski ---
I think I'm good, so go ahead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-base32-0.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7e5228d63b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #28 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Thanks. I've pushed my patches. Do you need anything more, or should we trigger
a build?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219662
--- Comment #17 from Orion Poplawski ---
* Thu Feb 23 2017 Orion Poplawski - 0.6-2
- Run tests verbosely
- Do build for python2 on EPEL
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-terminado.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.cora.nwra.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421603
Honza Horak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415331
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #4)
> Thanks for the reminder and sorry for my delayed response.
No problem. Thank you for the very thorough review.
> Issues:
> ===
> - Dist tag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419366
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
Still in error:
[ 6%] Building CXX object
tests/CMakeFiles/pybind11_tests.dir/pybind11_tests.cpp.o
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/pybind11-2.0.1/tests && /usr/bin/c++
-DPYBIND11_TEST_EIGEN -Dpybind11_tests_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402319
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
You commented out one of the files lines, so now it doesn't build (present but
unpackaged files in the python2 site-packages directory).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410594
--- Comment #6 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #5)
> additional nits:
> - you missed a changelog entry for 0.24
Oops! Added that back in
> - please rename python2-beaker-common and python2-beaker-clie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #27 from Orion Poplawski ---
Done. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425950
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |gecko-bugs-nobody@fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390
Gerd Pokorra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: rakudo - A |Review Request: rakudo -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425950
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426243
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1421366 (MSearch)
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421366
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1426243 (MediathekView)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421582
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391457
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391457
--- Comment #16 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed wit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418310
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-SOAP-WSDL-3.003-6.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d1dfba9c55
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421582
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421366
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/mediathe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426243
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/mediathe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426243
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1145303
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzill
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426243
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Referenced Bugs:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426243
Bug ID: 1426243
Summary: Review Request: MediathekView - Searches the online
media library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-base32
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424963
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Please do few more full package reviews where you can find some issues and
provide fixes for that. I know this can be much work for a new contributors but
that is how they can get familiar with the Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363
--- Comment #26 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Sorry for the delay. I don't really care about where things are installed as
long as I can build Julia with the package. Can you upload your version of the
package to git? Then I'll need to add some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401302
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jskar...@redhat.com
Assig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410992
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405714
--- Comment #2 from Martin Kolman ---
- the appdata file should mention this is a Slic3r fork/edition (the
description in the spec file already does that)
- ownership for the the icon directories should be sorted out
Package Review
==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410992
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jskar...@redhat.com
Assig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886300
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409355
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420374
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet ---
Update to 5.0.1
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/b258d9ac5d95927658f06a3921b3361cd923ed9f/php/phpunit/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage5/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage5.spec
Srpm:
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410594
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge ---
additional nits:
- you missed a changelog entry for 0.24
- please rename python2-beaker-common and python2-beaker-client to avoid
clashes with python-beaker (the other package)
- you shouldn't need to req
76 matches
Mail list logo