https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115659
--- Comment #8 from Dan Callaghan ---
I thought the left-pad fiasco would have been a bit of a wake-up call for them,
but it seems it wasn't...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115659
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from N
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115659
--- Comment #6 from Dan Callaghan ---
Yeah, wow... I had a feeling it would be something nightmarish like that. I've
had a bit of a taste of it myself from the handful of nodejs packages I'm
maintaining.
The NPM ecosystem is in quite a sorry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #13 from Adam Miller ---
Spec URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/reg.spec
SRPM URL: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/reg-0.4.1-1.src.rpm
scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20002741
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
cockatrice-2.3.17-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #35 from VincentS ---
(In reply to Matthieu Saulnier from comment #34)
> you have to subscribe to the ML first
>
> see "Manage subscription" button here
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #12 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
(In reply to Adam Miller from comment #11)
> (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #9)
> > Generic:
> > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> > other leg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
cockatrice-2.3.17-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #11 from Adam Miller ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #9)
> Generic:
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #10 from Adam Miller ---
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #8)
> Could you provide the following header in the spec (some of it is already
> there)?
>
> %global provider_prefix github.com/jessfraz/reg
> %global import_path
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452985
--- Comment #17 from Gerd Pokorra ---
The new srpm-URL is:
-
ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/zef/srpm/zef-0.20170520git.1490608-4.fc25.src.rpm
ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/zef/spec/zef.spec links to version 4 of the
spec file.
rawhi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #34 from Matthieu Saulnier ---
you have to subscribe to the ML first
see "Manage subscription" button here
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #33 from VincentS ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #31)
> (In reply to VincentS from comment #30)
> > I'm sorry about no news and thank you for all your work on it, actually I'm
> > waiting a response from le...@lists.fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #32 from VincentS ---
Really ? I don't understand.
I just resent it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452985
--- Comment #16 from Gerd Pokorra ---
It is easier and better to use the perl6 script 'tools/install-dist.pl' to
packaging perl6 modules, I think.
At the URL
-
ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/review/rakudo-json-tiny/srpm/rakudo-json-tiny-0.2017
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438842
--- Comment #14 from Stephen ---
Great, thanks :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner ---
Noticed that we've a package for bundled json.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/json/
https://github.com/mhogomchungu/sirikali/blob/master/src/3rdParty/json/json.hpp
I'll update this r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner ---
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2007
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this prod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner ---
Thanks for the hint about a new version.
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/sirikali.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/sirikali-1.2.7-1.20170611git.fc26.src.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879740
gvalkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(georgi.t.valkov@g |needinfo-
|mail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458441
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-scrypt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1427510 (RDO-PIKE)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
Bug ID: 1460759
Summary: Review Request: - Library to
configure Python logging easily
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|python-daiquiri - Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460757
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar ---
A dependency to python-daiquiri.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460757
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1427510 (RDO-PIKE)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460757
Bug ID: 1460757
Summary: Review Request: python-json-logger - A python library
adding a json log formatter
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115659
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean ---
See this for the dep chain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1115659&hide_resolved=0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115659
--- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean ---
Yeah, the dependencies to *build* bootstrap were enormous. I wrote a script
(npm2spec[1]) to automate it, but getting through the hundreds of reviews took
years. If I included buildtime dependencies to run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
--- Comment #9 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458441
--- Comment #5 from Alfredo Moralejo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458441
Alfredo Moralejo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438842
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Cline ---
Okay, it's built for Fedora 26!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427085
--- Comment #14 from Damian Wrobel ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #13)
> Try to unbundle gmock and gtest as well, we've also separate packages of
> those both. Sorry, I forgot to mention that.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460515
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460515
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-typed_ast-1.0.3-1.fc26 python-typeshed-0.1-0.20170612git.fc26
python3-mypy-0.511-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2ca3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428202
--- Comment #7 from Damian Wrobel ---
Do you have plans to update the spec file to v1.2.7, so I could continue the
review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460524
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-fig-link-util
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460515
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python3-typed_ast
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460523
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-psr-link
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458581
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-erusev-parsedown
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458580
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-cilex1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458578
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-phpdocumentor-graphviz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458579
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-phpdocumentor-fileset
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460515
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Cool, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438842
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Cline ---
(In reply to Stephen from comment #11)
> This is fantastic that this is now in Fedora! Can I get clarification on
> whether it will be packaged for F25/F26?
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458580
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458580
--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet ---
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstrea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458580
--- Comment #6 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Fixed issues:
https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/83d8acfe345d4fb18b05b6de69d4061aeb46c318
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/83d8acfe345d4fb18b05b6de69d4061aeb46c318/php-cile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432214
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchal...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460081
--- Comment #1 from David King ---
Directory ownserhip: should probably own /app.
For the GPL, specifying a version and including the license in the sources is
required, I think:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Lic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460662
Bug ID: 1460662
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mustermann - A library using
patterns like regular expressions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460630
Bug ID: 1460630
Summary: Review Request: copr-rpmbuild - performs COPR builds
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460076
David King changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|flatk-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460076
--- Comment #1 from David King ---
Simple stuff, the only blocker being ownership of the /etc/rpm directory, which
should probably just be co-owned by this package. Either that, or Requires rpm
(but that seems a bit silly):
https://fedoraproj
61 matches
Mail list logo
